Bridging the Gap Between Nanowires and Josephson Junctions: A Superconducting Device Based on Controlled Fluxon Transfer.

The basis for superconducting electronics can broadly be divided between two technologies: the Josephson junction and the superconducting nanowire. While the Josephson junction (JJ) remains the dominant technology due to its high speed and low power dissipation, recently proposed nanowire devices offer improvements such as gain, high fanout, and compatibility with CMOS circuits. Despite these benefits, nanowire-based electronics have largely been limited to binary operations, with devices switching between the superconducting state and a high-impedance resistive state dominated by uncontrolled hotspot dynamics. Unlike the JJ, they cannot increment an output through successive switching and their operation speeds are limited by their slow thermal-reset times. Thus, there is a need for an intermediate device with the interfacing capabilities of a nanowire but a faster, moderated response allowing for modulation of the output. We present a nanowire device based on controlled fluxon transport. We show that the device is capable of responding proportionally to the strength of its input, unlike other nanowire technologies. The device can be operated to produce a multilevel output with distinguishable states, the number of which can be tuned by circuit parameters. Agreement between experimental results and electrothermal circuit simulations demonstrates that the device is classical and may be readily engineered for applications including use as a multilevel memory.

[1]  A. Ney,et al.  Sensitive SQUID magnetometry for studying nanomagnetism , 2011, 1101.4764.

[2]  V. Bouchiat Detection of magnetic moments using a nano-SQUID: limits of resolution and sensitivity in near-field SQUID magnetometry , 2009 .

[3]  P. Alam,et al.  R , 1823, The Herodotus Encyclopedia.

[4]  Y. Braiman,et al.  A ternary memory cell using small Josephson junction arrays , 2018, Superconductor Science and Technology.

[5]  H. Courtois,et al.  Controlling hysteresis in superconducting constrictions with a resistive shunt , 2015, 1503.05664.

[6]  V. Semenov,et al.  RSFQ logic/memory family: a new Josephson-junction technology for sub-terahertz-clock-frequency digital systems , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[7]  Ghassan Yassin,et al.  Beam-combining superconducting detector for submillimetre-wave astronomical interferometry , 2003 .

[8]  Sae Woo Nam,et al.  A kinetic-inductance-based superconducting memory element with shunting and sub-nanosecond write times , 2018, Superconductor science & technology.

[9]  C. N. Lau,et al.  Hysteretic I-V curves of superconducting nanowires , 2003 .

[10]  Anna Y. Herr,et al.  Ultra-low-power superconductor logic , 2011, 1103.4269.

[11]  Karl K. Berggren,et al.  Frequency Pulling and Mixing of Relaxation Oscillations in Superconducting Nanowires , 2017, Physical Review Applied.

[12]  K. Berggren,et al.  Bias sputtered NbN and superconducting nanowire devices , 2017 .

[13]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[14]  Karl K Berggren,et al.  A superconducting-nanowire three-terminal electrothermal device. , 2014, Nano letters.

[15]  Takashi Taniguchi,et al.  Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices , 2018, Nature.

[16]  A. Dayem,et al.  BEHAVIOR OF THIN-FILM SUPERCONDUCTING BRIDGES IN A MICROWAVE FIELD. , 1967 .

[17]  Nobuyuki Yoshikawa,et al.  Josephson-CMOS Hybrid Memory With Nanocryotrons , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[18]  Karl K. Berggren,et al.  A superconducting nanowire can be modeled by using SPICE , 2018 .

[19]  Karl K. Berggren,et al.  A nanocryotron comparator can connect single-flux-quantum circuits to conventional electronics , 2016, 1610.09349.

[20]  Igor I Soloviev,et al.  Beyond Moore’s technologies: operation principles of a superconductor alternative , 2017, Beilstein journal of nanotechnology.

[21]  Weak link nanobridges as single flux quantum elements , 2017 .

[22]  Karl K. Berggren,et al.  A compact superconducting nanowire memory element operated by nanowire cryotrons , 2017, 1711.08290.

[23]  K. Berggren,et al.  Using Geometry To Sense Current. , 2016, Nano letters.

[24]  Ghassan Yassin,et al.  Broadband 230 GHz finline mixer for astronomical imaging arrays , 1997 .

[25]  Yasunobu Nakamura,et al.  Quantum computers , 2010, Nature.

[26]  Alexey Bezryadin,et al.  Nanoscale superconducting memory based on the kinetic inductance of asymmetric nanowire loops , 2017, 1701.08715.

[27]  K. K. Likharev,et al.  Rapid Single-Flux-Quantum Logic , 1993 .

[28]  Todd A. Brun,et al.  Quantum Computing , 2011, Computer Science, The Hardware, Software and Heart of It.

[29]  Eric A. Dauler,et al.  Electrothermal feedback in superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors , 2008, 0812.0290.

[30]  Konstantin K. Likharev,et al.  Experimental study of the RSFQ logic elements , 1989 .

[31]  Anthony J. Peacock,et al.  Development of distributed readout imaging detectors based on superconducting tunnel junctions for UV/optical astronomy , 2000, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.