Success factors influencing implementation of e-government at different stages of maturity: a literature review

Even though digitisation efforts within the public sector began over two decades ago, organisations are still struggling to implement e-government services, and most initiatives end in failures. As e-government services have evolved and become more comprehensive, the challenges of implementing them have become more extensive as well. The aim of this paper is to give an overview of the e-government literature and identify digitisation success factors at different stages of e-government maturity using Lee's synthesised e-government development model (2010). Six categories of success factors were identified across all maturity levels, including external environment, organisation, management, employees, citizens and technology. Low level success factors were identified within the organisation and technology categories, whereas high level success factors also were found within the management category. Future research focusing on the distinction between low and high level success factors is needed to help practitioners modify their plans and make the right decisions when digitising government services at different levels of e-government maturity.

[1]  S. Colesca Understanding Trust in e-Government , 2009 .

[2]  Marvine Hamner,et al.  Enhancing the case for Electronic Government in developing nations: A people-centric study focused in Saudi Arabia , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[3]  D. Askounis,et al.  A Critical Assessment of Project Management Methods with Respect to Electronic Government Implementation Challenges , 2010 .

[4]  Soongoo Hong,et al.  Evaluating Government Website Accessibility: a Comparative Study , 2008, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[5]  Margôt Kuttschreuter,et al.  Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in The Netherlands , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[7]  France Bélanger,et al.  Digitizing Government Interactions with Constituents: An Historical Review of E-Government Research in Information Systems , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Jan van Dijk,et al.  Personalization in the public sector: An inventory of organizational and user obstacles towards personalization of electronic services in the public sector , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[9]  Sotiris Karetsos,et al.  Mobile government: A challenge for agriculture , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[10]  Vesper Owei,et al.  Questioning the pace and pathway of e-government development in Africa: A case study of South Africa's Cape Gateway project , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[11]  Shin-Yuan Hung,et al.  Determinants of user acceptance of the e-Government services: The case of online tax filing and payment system , 2006, Gov. Inf. Q..

[12]  Frank Bannister,et al.  Trust and transformational government: A proposed framework for research , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[13]  Thea van der Geest,et al.  Shall I Tell You Where I Live and Who I Am? Factors Influencing the Behavioral Intention to Disclose Personal Data for Online Government Transactions , 2012, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[14]  Lai Lai Tung,et al.  Adoption of electronic government services among business organizations in Singapore , 2005, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Yuan Long,et al.  Synthesizing e-government stage models - a meta-synthesis based on meta-ethnography approach , 2005, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[16]  Dinesh A. Mirchandani,et al.  Perspectives of citizens towards e-government in Thailand and Indonesia: A multigroup analysis , 2008, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[17]  Ramessur Taruna Shalini,et al.  Are Mauritians ready for e-Government services? , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[18]  Jian Anna Xiong Current status and needs of Chinese e-government users , 2006, Electron. Libr..

[19]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  E-government adoption: A cultural comparison , 2008, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[20]  P. Jaeger,et al.  Social Information Behavior and the Democratic Process: Information Poverty, Normative Behavior, and Electronic Government in the United States , 2004 .

[21]  Victor R. Prybutok,et al.  Creating Value through Managing Knowledge in an E-Government to Constituency (G2C) Environment , 2005, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Transformational change and business process reengineering (BPR): Lessons from the British and Dutch public sector , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[23]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[24]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Understanding the complexity of electronic government: Implications from the digital divide literature , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[25]  J. Ramon Gil-Garcia,et al.  Towards a multidimensional model for evaluating electronic government: Proposing a more comprehensive and integrative perspective , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[26]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[27]  S. Dawes The Evolution and Continuing Challenges of E-Governance , 2008 .

[28]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Implementing e-government in Sri Lanka: Lessons from the UK , 2009, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[29]  F. Henning,et al.  The Challenge of Collaboration – ICT Implementation Networks in Courts in The Netherlands , 2009 .

[30]  Øystein Sæbø,et al.  Understanding the dynamics in e-Participation initiatives: Looking through the genre and stakeholder lenses , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[31]  Michael Willoughby,et al.  Making e-government attractive , 2010 .

[32]  Meng Seng Wong,et al.  Cultural issues in developing E-Government in Malaysia , 2010, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[33]  Shahjahan H. Bhuiyan,et al.  Modernizing Bangladesh public administration through e-governance: Benefits and challenges , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[34]  France Bélanger,et al.  Trust and Risk in eGovernment Adoption , 2008, AMCIS.

[35]  Kai R. T. Larsen,et al.  A Taxonomy of Antecedents of Information Systems Success: Variable Analysis Studies , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Grounded theory analysis of e-government initiatives: Exploring perceptions of government authorities , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[37]  Yuquan Shi,et al.  The accessibility of Chinese local government Web sites: An exploratory study , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[38]  Andrej Kovacic,et al.  The Role of Business Renovation and Information in E-Government , 2008, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Peter Trkman,et al.  Upstream supply chain management in e-government: The case of Slovenia , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[40]  Mohammad Sharifi,et al.  The study of the success indicators for pre-implementation activities of Iran's E-Government development projects , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[41]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Collaborative digital government in Mexico: Some lessons from federal Web-based interorganizational information integration initiatives , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[42]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Moving towards maturity: challenges to successful e-government implementation and diffusion , 2012, DATB.

[43]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Managing IT-enabled transformation in the public sector: A case study on e-government in South Korea , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[44]  Hung,et al.  Building Citizen-centred E-government in Taiwan: Problems and Prospects (发展以公民为核心的电子化政府-台湾的经验与启示)1 , 2012 .

[45]  Charles C. Hinnant,et al.  Examining pre-adoption interest in online innovations: an exploratory study of e-service personalization in the public sector , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[46]  Michael Theil,et al.  Technology push, legislation pull? E-government in the European Union , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..

[47]  M. J. Moon The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? , 2002 .

[48]  Whasun Jho,et al.  Challenges for e-governance: protests from civil society on the protection of privacy in e-government in Korea , 2005 .

[49]  Jane Fedorowicz,et al.  Barriers to Interorganizational Information Sharing in e-Government: A Stakeholder Analysis , 2010, Inf. Soc..

[50]  Ardion Beldad,et al.  I trust not therefore it must be risky: Determinants of the perceived risks of disclosing personal data for e-government transactions , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[51]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[52]  Mohammad Hamdan,et al.  Computerization and e-Government implementation in Jordan: Challenges, obstacles and successes , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[53]  Gino Verleye,et al.  User-centered E-Government in practice: A comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[54]  M. J. Moon,et al.  Advancing E‐Government at the Grassroots: Tortoise or Hare? , 2005 .

[55]  Thea van der Geest,et al.  A cue or two and I'll trust you: Determinants of trust in government organizations in terms of their processing and usage of citizens' personal information disclosed online , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[56]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  A goal-driven management framework for electronic government transformation projects implementation , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[57]  Muhammad Abdul Karim,et al.  Technology and Improved Service Delivery: Learning Points from the Malaysian Experience , 2003 .

[58]  Rob Wilson,et al.  Seeing the Full Picture? Technologically Enabled Multi-Agency Working in Health and Social Care , 2010 .

[59]  T. H. Kwon,et al.  Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation , 1987 .

[60]  Gamel O. Wiredu Information Systems Innovation in Public Organisations: An Institutional Perspective , 2012, Inf. Technol. People.

[61]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  10 year retrospect on stage models of e-Government: A qualitative meta-synthesis , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[62]  Anne Daly,et al.  Accessing e-government: challenges for citizens and organizations , 2005 .

[63]  Dawit Demissie,et al.  An analysis of African e-Government service websites , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[64]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Analyzing the role of stakeholders in the adoption of technology integration solutions in UK local government: An exploratory study , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[65]  Peter Woods,et al.  Predictors for E-government Adoption in Jordan: Deployment of an Empirical Evaluation Based on a Citizen-centric Approach , 2012, Inf. Technol. People.

[66]  Tino Schuppan,et al.  E-Government in developing countries: Experiences from sub-Saharan Africa , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[67]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[68]  Janice C. Sipior,et al.  The digital divide and t-government in the United States: using the technology acceptance model to understand usage , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[69]  Lucas M. Venter,et al.  A sustainable information security framework for e-Government – case of Tanzania , 2012 .

[70]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  IT Mediated Customer Services in E-Government: A Citizen's Perspective , 2009, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..