Coupling surface plasmon resonance to mass spectrometry to discover novel protein–protein interactions

The elucidation of protein–protein interaction networks is a crucial task in the postgenomic era. In this protocol, we describe our approach to discover protein–protein interactions using the surface plasmon resonance technique coupled to mass spectrometry (MS). A peptide or a protein is immobilized on a sensor chip and then exposed to brain extracts injected through the surface of the chip by a microfluidic system. The interactions between the immobilized ligand and the extracts can be monitored in real time. Proteins interacting with the peptide/protein are recovered, trypsinated and identified using MS. The data obtained are searched against a sequence database using the Mascot 2.1 software. Control experiments using blank sensor chips and/or randomized peptides are carried out to exclude nonspecific interactors. The protocol can be carried out in <3 days. Other methods, such as yeast two-hybrid systems or pull-down approaches followed by MS, are widely used to screen protein–protein interactions. However, as the yeast two-hybrid system requires protein interactions in the nucleus of yeast, proteins that are abundant in other compartments may not be detected. Pull-down approaches based on immunoprecipitation can be used to study endogenous proteins but they require specific antibodies. The protocol presented here does not require the specific labeling or modification of proteins.

[1]  H. J. Griesser,et al.  A general method to recondition and reuse BIAcore sensor chips fouled with covalently immobilized protein/peptide. , 1995, Analytical biochemistry.

[2]  J. Homola Surface plasmon resonance sensors for detection of chemical and biological species. , 2008, Chemical reviews.

[3]  L. Leyton,et al.  Caveolins, caveolae, and lipid rafts in cellular transport, signaling, and disease. , 2004, Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire.

[4]  R B Sim,et al.  Complement C4bC2 complex formation: an investigation by surface plasmon resonance. , 2001, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[5]  Jason C. Murphy,et al.  Large-scale, nonchromatographic purification of plasmid DNA. , 2006, Methods in molecular medicine.

[6]  E. Komives,et al.  Electrostatic dependence of the thrombin-thrombomodulin interaction. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  R. Nelson,et al.  BIA/MS: interfacing biomolecular interaction analysis with mass spectrometry. , 1997, Analytical biochemistry.

[8]  J. Hahn,et al.  Impairment of microtubule system increases alpha-synuclein aggregation and toxicity. , 2008, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[9]  Per E Andrén,et al.  Use of surface plasmon resonance coupled with mass spectrometry reveals an interaction between the voltage-gated sodium channel type X alpha-subunit and caveolin-1. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[10]  A. Ashcroft Ionization Methods in Organic Mass Spectrometry , 1997 .

[11]  R. Nelson,et al.  Analysis of human urine protein biomarkers via biomolecular interaction analysis mass spectrometry. , 2001, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[12]  J. M. McDonnell,et al.  Surface plasmon resonance: towards an understanding of the mechanisms of biological molecular recognition. , 2001, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[13]  M. O’Connor-McCourt,et al.  Real-time kinetic studies on the interaction of transforming growth factor alpha with the epidermal growth factor receptor extracellular domain reveal a conformational change model. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[14]  Jos Buijs,et al.  Optimizing the surface plasmon resonance/mass spectrometry interface for functional proteomics applications: How to avoid and utilize nonspecific adsorption , 2006, Proteomics.

[15]  D. N. Perkins,et al.  Probability‐based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data , 1999, Electrophoresis.

[16]  C. Welch Principles and Clinical Applications of Otometry , 1988 .

[17]  J. Hahn,et al.  Impairment of microtubule system increases α-synuclein aggregation and toxicity , 2008 .

[18]  X. D. Hoa,et al.  Towards integrated and sensitive surface plasmon resonance biosensors: a review of recent progress. , 2007, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[19]  Ye Fang,et al.  Non-invasive optical biosensor for assaying endogenous G protein-coupled receptors in adherent cells. , 2007, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[20]  S. Okumura,et al.  Caveolin regulates microtubule polymerization in the vascular smooth muscle cells. , 2006, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[21]  C. Aisenbrey,et al.  How is protein aggregation in amyloidogenic diseases modulated by biological membranes? , 2008, European Biophysics Journal.

[22]  R. Nelson,et al.  Surface plasmon resonance biomolecular interaction analysis mass spectrometry. 1. Chip-based analysis. , 1997, Analytical chemistry.

[23]  Marc Flajolet,et al.  Alterations in 5-HT1B Receptor Function by p11 in Depression-Like States , 2006, Science.

[24]  W. Heisenberg,et al.  Psoriasis - a review of recent progress, characteristics, diagnostic management , 2022, Journal of Education, Health and Sport.

[25]  P. Svenningsson,et al.  Increased striatal mRNA and protein levels of the immunophilin FKBP-12 in experimental Parkinson's disease and identification of FKBP-12-binding proteins. , 2007, Journal of proteome research.

[26]  Jos Buijs,et al.  SPR-MS in functional proteomics. , 2005, Briefings in functional genomics & proteomics.

[27]  C. Ho,et al.  Electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry: principles and clinical applications. , 2003, The Clinical biochemist. Reviews.

[28]  Peter Roepstorff,et al.  Screening for enzyme inhibitors by surface plasmon resonance combined with mass spectrometry. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[29]  R. Nelson,et al.  Surface plasmon resonance biomolecular interaction analysis mass spectrometry. 2. Fiber optic-based analysis. , 1997, Analytical chemistry.

[30]  J. Wood,et al.  Identification of binding domains in the sodium channel NaV1.8 intracellular N‐terminal region and annexin II light chain p11 , 2004, FEBS letters.

[31]  W. Wilson,et al.  Quantitative analysis of small molecule-nucleic acid interactions with a biosensor surface and surface plasmon resonance detection. , 2010, Methods in molecular biology.

[32]  Randall W. Nelson,et al.  Interfacing biomolecular interaction analysis with mass spectrometry and the use of Bioreactive mass spectrometer probe tips in protein characterization , 1997 .

[33]  A. Scholten,et al.  Surface‐Plasmon‐Resonance‐Based Chemical Proteomics: Efficient Specific Extraction and Semiquantitative Identification of Cyclic Nucleotide‐Binding Proteins from Cellular Lysates by Using a Combination of Surface Plasmon Resonance, Sequential Elution and Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometr , 2007, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[34]  M. Vogeser,et al.  Liquid Chromatography Tandem-mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) - Technique and Applications in Endocrinology , 2007, Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association.

[35]  T. Veenstra,et al.  Mass spectrometry: m/z 1983-2008. , 2008, BioTechniques.

[36]  Binh Nguyen,et al.  Biosensor-surface plasmon resonance: quantitative analysis of small molecule-nucleic acid interactions. , 2007, Methods.

[37]  F. Lee,et al.  Parkin Disrupts the α-Synuclein/Dopamine Transporter Interaction: Consequences Toward Dopamine-induced Toxicity , 2007, Journal of Molecular Neuroscience.