Handwriting individualization using distance and rarity

Forensic individualization is the task of associating observed evidence with a specific source. The likelihood ratio (LR) is a quantitative measure that expresses the degree of uncertainty in individualization, where the numerator represents the likelihood that the evidence corresponds to the known and the denominator the likelihood that it does not correspond to the known. Since the number of parameters needed to compute the LR is exponential with the number of feature measurements, a commonly used simplification is the use of likelihoods based on distance (or similarity) given the two alternative hypotheses. This paper proposes an intermediate method which decomposes the LR as the product of two factors, one based on distance and the other on rarity. It was evaluated using a data set of handwriting samples, by determining whether two writing samples were written by the same/different writer(s). The accuracy of the distance and rarity method, as measured by error rates, is significantly better than the distance method.

[1]  Christophe Champod,et al.  Computation of Likelihood Ratios in Fingerprint Identification for Configurations of Any Number of Minutiæ , 2007, Journal of forensic sciences.

[2]  Sargur N. Srihari,et al.  Document Title: Computational Methods for Handwritten Questioned Document Examination , 2010 .

[3]  Sargur N. Srihari,et al.  Comparison of ROC and Likelihood Decision Methods in Automatic Fingerprint Verification , 2008, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[4]  Sung-Hyuk Cha,et al.  Individuality of handwriting. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.

[5]  Sargur N. Srihari,et al.  Comparison of statistical models for writer verification , 2009, Electronic Imaging.

[6]  Sargur N. Srihari,et al.  Binary Vector Dissimilarity Measures for Handwriting Identification , 2003, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[7]  Ian W. Evett,et al.  A Bayesian approach to interpreting footwear marks in forensic casework , 1998 .

[8]  Harish Srinivasan,et al.  On the Discriminability of the Handwriting of Twins , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.

[9]  David Lindley,et al.  A problem in forensic science , 1977 .

[10]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[11]  Franco Taroni,et al.  Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists , 2004 .

[12]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[13]  Colin Aitken,et al.  Evaluation of trace evidence in the form of multivariate data , 2004 .

[14]  Pierre Esseiva,et al.  Different likelihood ratio approaches to evaluate the strength of evidence of MDMA tablet comparisons. , 2009, Forensic science international.

[15]  David J. Balding,et al.  Bayesian Networks and Probabilistic Inference in Forensic Science , 2011 .