Genome-wide analysis of histone modifications reveals dynamic associations between bivalent promoter and enhancer

In embryonic stem cells, many promoters harbor a distinctive chromatin modification patterns that combines the active histone H3K4me3 mark and the repressive H3K27me3 mark. These bivalent domains are considered to play a pivotal role related to pluripotency by maintaining lineage commitment programs in a poised state. Enhancers are long-range regulatory elements that enable precise tissue-specific gene expression patterns during development, which are marked by the presence of H3K4me1. However, how enhancers functional interact with bivalent promoters has remained elusive. Here, we identified thousands of enhancers and bivalent promoters through genome-wide epigenomic analysis in embryonic stem cells and neural progenitor cells. We found that bivalent promoters are significantly proximal to poised enhancers which are distinguished by the enrichment of H3K4me1 and the absence of the H3K27ac than active promoters. Upon differentiation from ES cells to NP cells, some de novo formed bivalent promoters enriched in nervous system development are found. We also find distinct classes of bivalent genes are differentially transcribed upon differentiation. Our findings will have implications in understanding the regulatory mechanisms that orchestrate the lineage differentiation process.

[1]  Timothy J. Durham,et al.  "Systematic" , 1966, Comput. J..

[2]  Aaron R. Quinlan,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Genome Analysis Bedtools: a Flexible Suite of Utilities for Comparing Genomic Features , 2022 .

[3]  Renato Paro,et al.  Distinct contributions of histone H3 lysine 9 and 27 methylation to locus-specific stability of polycomb complexes. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[4]  Kristian Helin,et al.  Genome-wide mapping of Polycomb target genes unravels their roles in cell fate transitions. , 2006, Genes & development.

[5]  W. Sung,et al.  ChIA-PET tool for comprehensive chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tag sequencing , 2010, Genome Biology.

[6]  Rachael P. Huntley,et al.  The UniProt-GO Annotation database in 2011 , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[7]  Mark Groudine,et al.  Enhancers: The abundance and function of regulatory sequences beyond promoters , 2010 .

[8]  Leighton J. Core,et al.  Nascent RNA Sequencing Reveals Widespread Pausing and Divergent Initiation at Human Promoters , 2008, Science.

[9]  J. Lis,et al.  P-TEFb kinase recruitment and function at heat shock loci. , 2000, Genes & development.

[10]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Methylation of Histone H3 K4 Mediates Association of the Isw1p ATPase with Chromatin. , 2018, Molecular cell.

[11]  I. Amit,et al.  Comprehensive mapping of long range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome , 2011 .

[12]  A. Tanay,et al.  Three-Dimensional Folding and Functional Organization Principles of the Drosophila Genome , 2012, Cell.

[13]  R. Young,et al.  Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome , 2009, Genome Biology.

[15]  Nathaniel D. Heintzman,et al.  Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression , 2009, Nature.

[16]  James A. Cuff,et al.  A Bivalent Chromatin Structure Marks Key Developmental Genes in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2006, Cell.

[17]  Michael J. Ziller,et al.  Dissecting neural differentiation regulatory networks through epigenetic footprinting , 2014, Nature.

[18]  P. Scacheri,et al.  Epigenetic signatures distinguish multiple classes of enhancers with distinct cellular functions. , 2011, Genome research.

[19]  Manolis Kellis,et al.  RNA polymerase stalling at developmental control genes in the Drosophila melanogaster embryo , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[20]  W. Sung,et al.  Chromatin connectivity maps reveal dynamic promoter–enhancer long-range associations , 2013, Nature.

[21]  John R. Yates,et al.  Chd1 chromodomain links histone H3 methylation with SAGA- and SLIK-dependent acetylation , 2005, Nature.

[22]  Stephan Sauer,et al.  Chromatin signatures of pluripotent cell lines , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[23]  Manolis Kellis,et al.  Discovery and Characterization of Chromatin States for Systematic Annotation of the Human Genome , 2011, RECOMB.

[24]  Yong Zhang,et al.  Identifying ChIP-seq enrichment using MACS , 2012, Nature Protocols.

[25]  Brad T. Sherman,et al.  Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[26]  R. Kingston,et al.  Chromatin Compaction by a Polycomb Group Protein Complex , 2004, Science.

[27]  Renato Paro,et al.  Epigenetic regulation of cellular memory by the Polycomb and Trithorax group proteins. , 2004, Annual review of genetics.

[28]  Danny Reinberg,et al.  Human but Not Yeast CHD1 Binds Directly and Selectively to Histone H3 Methylated at Lysine 4 via Its Tandem Chromodomains* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  G. Pan,et al.  Whole-genome analysis of histone H3 lysine 4 and lysine 27 methylation in human embryonic stem cells. , 2007, Cell stem cell.

[30]  Jane M J Lin,et al.  Identification and Characterization of Cell Type–Specific and Ubiquitous Chromatin Regulatory Structures in the Human Genome , 2007, PLoS genetics.