Geo-uninorm consistency control module for preference similarity network hierarchical clustering based consensus model

Abstract In order to avoid misleading decision solutions in group decision making (GDM) processes, in addition to consensus, which is obviously desirable to guarantee that the group of experts accept the final decision solution, consistency of information should also be sought after. For experts’ preferences represented by reciprocal fuzzy preference relations, consistency is linked to the transitivity property. In this study, we put forward a new consensus approach to solve GDM with reciprocal preference relations that implements rationality criteria of consistency based on the transitivity property with the following twofold aim prior to finding the final decision solution: (A) to develop a consistency control module to provide personalized consistency feedback to inconsistent experts in the GDM problem to guarantee the consistency of preferences; and (B) to design a consistent preference network clustering based consensus measure based on an undirected weighted consistent preference similarity network structure with undirected complete links, which using the concept of structural equivalence will allow one to (i) cluster the experts; and (ii) measure their consensus status. Based on the uninorm characterization of consistency of reciprocal preferences relations and the geometric average, we propose the implementation of the geo-uninorm operator to derive a consistent based preference relation from a given reciprocal preference relation. This is subsequently used to measure the consistency level of a given preference relation as the cosine similarity between the respective relations’ essential vectors of preference intensity. The proposed geo-uninorm consistency measure will allow the building of a consistency control module based on a personalized feedback mechanism to be implemented when the consistency level is insufficient. This consistency control module has two advantages: (1) it guarantees consistency by advising inconsistent expert(s) to modify their preferences with minimum changes; and (2) it provides fair recommendations individually, depending on the experts’ personal level of inconsistency. Once consistency of preferences is guaranteed, a structural equivalence preference similarity network is constructed. For the purpose of representing structurally equivalent experts and measuring consensus within the group of experts, we develop an agglomerative hierarchical clustering based consensus algorithm, which can be used as a visualization tool in monitoring current state of experts’ group agreement and in controlling the decision making process. The proposed model is validated with a comparative analysis with an existing literature study, from which conclusions are drawn and explained.

[1]  José Luis García-Lapresta,et al.  Consensus-based hierarchical agglomerative clustering in the context of weak orders , 2013, 2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS).

[2]  Yilun Shang,et al.  Finite-time cluster average consensus for networks via distributed iterations , 2017 .

[3]  Ingo Scholtes,et al.  Enhancing Consensus under Opinion Bias by Means of Hierarchical Decision Making , 2013, Adv. Complex Syst..

[4]  Zhibin Wu,et al.  A concise consensus support model for group decision making with reciprocal preference relations based on deviation measures , 2012, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[5]  Changyong Liang,et al.  A trust induced recommendation mechanism for reaching consensus in group decision making , 2017, Knowl. Based Syst..

[6]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[7]  Zhou-Jing Wang,et al.  Approaches to improving consistency of interval fuzzy preference relations , 2014 .

[8]  Francisco Chiclana,et al.  A new measure of consensus with reciprocal preference relations: The correlation consensus degree , 2016, Knowl. Based Syst..

[9]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  Consensus in Group Decision Making and Social Networks , 2017 .

[10]  Luis Martínez-López,et al.  Integration of a Consistency Control Module within a Consensus Model , 2008, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[11]  R. Yager Aggregation operators and fuzzy systems modeling , 1994 .

[12]  Huchang Liao,et al.  Isomorphic Multiplicative Transitivity for Intuitionistic and Interval-Valued Fuzzy Preference Relations and Its Application in Deriving Their Priority Vectors , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[13]  J. Aczel,et al.  A Short Course on Functional Equations: Based Upon Recent Applications to the Social and Behavioral Sciences , 1986 .

[14]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Cardinal Consistency of Reciprocal Preference Relations: A Characterization of Multiplicative Transitivity , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[15]  Xinwang Liu,et al.  Social network analysis based approach to group decision making problem with fuzzy preference relations , 2016, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[16]  Didier Dubois,et al.  A review of fuzzy set aggregation connectives , 1985, Inf. Sci..

[17]  Travis J. Grosser,et al.  Structural Equivalence: Meaning and Measures , 2015 .

[18]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  A visual interaction consensus model for social network group decision making with trust propagation , 2017, Knowl. Based Syst..

[19]  Katsumi Inoue,et al.  Analysis of New Aggregation Operators : Mean 3 Π , 2007 .

[20]  José Luis García-Lapresta,et al.  Consensus-based clustering under hesitant qualitative assessments , 2016, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[21]  Francisco Chiclana,et al.  Preference similarity network structural equivalence clustering based consensus group decision making model , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..

[22]  Katsumi Inoue,et al.  Analysis of New Aggregation Operators: Mean 3Pi , 2007, J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Informatics.

[23]  W. Silvert Symmetric Summation: A Class of Operations on Fuzzy Sets , 1979 .

[24]  Andrei Doncescu,et al.  A General Version of the Triple Π Operator , 2013, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[25]  John A. Keane,et al.  Clustering Decision Makers with respect to similarity of views , 2014, 2014 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM).

[26]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  A minimum adjustment cost feedback mechanism based consensus model for group decision making under social network with distributed linguistic trust , 2018, Inf. Fusion.

[27]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  Fuzzy Group Decision Making With Incomplete Information Guided by Social Influence , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[28]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  On mean type aggregation , 1996, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[29]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  Dynamics of Public Opinions in an Online and Offline Social Network , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Big Data.

[30]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Uninorm aggregation operators , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[31]  Ananthram Swami,et al.  Consensus, Polarization and Clustering of Opinions in Social Networks , 2013, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[32]  José Luis García-Lapresta,et al.  Ordinal proximity measures in the context of unbalanced qualitative scales and some applications to consensus and clustering , 2015, Appl. Soft Comput..

[33]  H. White,et al.  “Structural Equivalence of Individuals in Social Networks” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[34]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  A statistical comparative study of different similarity measures of consensus in group decision making , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[35]  Yin-Feng Xu,et al.  Consistency issues of interval pairwise comparison matrices , 2014, Soft Computing.

[36]  M. Bohanec,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2004 .

[37]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[38]  Francisco Chiclana,et al.  Visual information feedback mechanism and attitudinal prioritisation method for group decision making with triangular fuzzy complementary preference relations , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[39]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[40]  Tetsuzo Tanino,et al.  Fuzzy Preference Relations in Group Decision Making , 1988 .

[41]  Zhou-Jing Wang,et al.  Consistency analysis and priority derivation of triangular fuzzy preference relations based on modal value and geometric mean , 2015, Inf. Sci..

[42]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Structure of Uninorms , 1997, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[43]  Yin-Feng Xu,et al.  Multiple attribute consensus rules with minimum adjustments to support consensus reaching , 2014, Knowl. Based Syst..