Stiffness of Hydrogels Regulates Cellular Reprogramming Efficiency Through Mesenchymal-to-Epithelial Transition and Stemness Markers.

The stiffness of hydrogels has been reported to direct cell fate. Here, we found that the stiffness of hydrogels promotes the reprogramming of mouse embryonic fibroblasts into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). We prepared cell culture substrates of various stiffnesses (0.1, 1, 4, 10, and 20 kPa) using a polyacrylamide hydrogel. We found that culture on a soft hydrogel plays an important role in inducing cellular reprogramming into iPSCs via activation of mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition and enhancement of stemness marker expression. These results suggest that physical signals at the interface between cell and substrate can be used as a potent regulator to promote cell fate changes associated with reprogramming into iPSCs, which may lead to effective and reproducible iPSC-production.

[1]  N. Gadegaard,et al.  Nanoscale surfaces for the long-term maintenance of mesenchymal stem cell phenotype and multipotency. , 2011, Nature materials.

[2]  A. López-Colomé,et al.  Thrombin induces slug‐mediated E‐cadherin transcriptional repression and the parallel Up‐regulation of N‐cadherin by a transcription‐independent mechanism in RPE cells , 2013, Journal of cellular physiology.

[3]  L. Dai,et al.  Substrate stiffness regulates apoptosis and the mRNA expression of extracellular matrix regulatory genes in the rat annular cells. , 2011, Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology.

[4]  Jen-I Liang,et al.  Migration speed and directionality switch of normal epithelial cells after TGF-β1-induced EMT (tEMT) on micro-structured polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrates with variations in stiffness and topographic patterning , 2013, Cell communication & adhesion.

[5]  Tomonobu M. Watanabe,et al.  Culturing of mouse and human cells on soft substrates promote the expression of stem cell markers. , 2014, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[6]  Jianjun Cheng,et al.  Role of mechanical factors in fate decisions of stem cells. , 2011, Regenerative medicine.

[7]  Kristi S. Anseth,et al.  Mechanical memory and dosing influence stem cell fate , 2014, Nature materials.

[8]  Robert A. Weinberg,et al.  Epithelial-mesenchymal transition: at the crossroads of development and tumor metastasis. , 2008, Developmental cell.

[9]  G. Pan,et al.  Sequential introduction of reprogramming factors reveals a time-sensitive requirement for individual factors and a sequential EMT–MET mechanism for optimal reprogramming , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[10]  Weiqi Zhang,et al.  Generation of iPSCs from mouse fibroblasts with a single gene, Oct4, and small molecules , 2011, Cell Research.

[11]  Jennifer S. Park,et al.  The effect of matrix stiffness on the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in response to TGF-β. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[12]  Hidenori Akutsu,et al.  A small-molecule inhibitor of tgf-Beta signaling replaces sox2 in reprogramming by inducing nanog. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[13]  K. Gravdal,et al.  A Switch from E-Cadherin to N-Cadherin Expression Indicates Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition and Is of Strong and Independent Importance for the Progress of Prostate Cancer , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[14]  K. Hochedlinger,et al.  Induced pluripotency: history, mechanisms, and applications. , 2010, Genes & development.

[15]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[16]  Yu-Li Wang,et al.  The regulation of traction force in relation to cell shape and focal adhesions. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[17]  J. West,et al.  A synthetic matrix with independently tunable biochemistry and mechanical properties to study epithelial morphogenesis and EMT in a lung adenocarcinoma model. , 2012, Cancer research.

[18]  Ning Wang,et al.  Soft Substrates Promote Homogeneous Self-Renewal of Embryonic Stem Cells via Downregulating Cell-Matrix Tractions , 2010, PloS one.

[19]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[20]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[21]  Albert C. Chen,et al.  Matrix stiffness drives Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and tumour metastasis through a TWIST1-G3BP2 mechanotransduction pathway , 2015, Nature Cell Biology.

[22]  Ashley C. Brown,et al.  Directing epithelial to mesenchymal transition through engineered microenvironments displaying orthogonal adhesive and mechanical cues. , 2012, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[23]  Dongyuan Lü,et al.  Differential regulation of morphology and stemness of mouse embryonic stem cells by substrate stiffness and topography. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[24]  C. Mader,et al.  Probing cell shape regulation with patterned substratum: requirement of myosin II-mediated contractility. , 2007, Soft matter.

[25]  Y. Yoneda,et al.  The timing of retroviral silencing correlates with the quality of induced pluripotent stem cell lines. , 2011, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[26]  Tatiana Segura,et al.  The spreading, migration and proliferation of mouse mesenchymal stem cells cultured inside hyaluronic acid hydrogels. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[27]  Thomas Ludwig,et al.  Interdependency of cell adhesion, force generation and extracellular proteolysis in matrix remodeling , 2011, Journal of Cell Science.

[28]  E. Cuyás,et al.  Nuclear reprogramming of luminal-like breast cancer cells generates Sox2-overexpressing cancer stem-like cellular states harboring transcriptional activation of the mTOR pathway , 2013, Cell cycle.

[29]  Ashley C. Brown,et al.  Physical and chemical microenvironmental cues orthogonally control the degree and duration of fibrosis‐associated epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transitions , 2013, The Journal of pathology.

[30]  Jiuhong Kang,et al.  E‐Cadherin‐Mediated Cell–Cell Contact Is Critical for Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Generation , 2010, Stem cells.

[31]  S. Thrun,et al.  Substrate Elasticity Regulates Skeletal Muscle Stem Cell Self-Renewal in Culture , 2010, Science.

[32]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Force-dependent cell signaling in stem cell differentiation , 2012, Stem Cell Research & Therapy.

[33]  W. Birchmeier,et al.  E‐cadherin is crucial for embryonic stem cell pluripotency and can replace OCT4 during somatic cell reprogramming , 2011, EMBO reports.

[34]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors , 2006, Cell.

[35]  J. Wrana,et al.  Functional genomics reveals a BMP-driven mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in the initiation of somatic cell reprogramming. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[36]  D. Leckband,et al.  Integrated biochemical and mechanical signals regulate multifaceted human embryonic stem cell functions , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[37]  Hsien-Chang Chang,et al.  Deregulation of AP-1 Proteins in Collagen Gel-induced Epithelial Cell Apoptosis Mediated by Low Substratum Rigidity* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[38]  H. Deng,et al.  Pluripotent Stem Cells Induced from Mouse Somatic Cells by Small-Molecule Compounds , 2013, Science.

[39]  D. Schaffer,et al.  Biophysical regulation of epigenetic state and cell reprogramming. , 2013, Nature materials.

[40]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Matrix rigidity regulates a switch between TGF-β1–induced apoptosis and epithelial–mesenchymal transition , 2012, Molecular biology of the cell.

[41]  A. Riggs,et al.  Identification of Oct4-activating compounds that enhance reprogramming efficiency , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Manuel A. González,et al.  Efficient Cell Reprogramming Using Bioengineered Surfaces , 2012, Advanced healthcare materials.

[43]  Wenjun Guo,et al.  Induction of pluripotent stem cells by defined factors is greatly improved by small-molecule compounds , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[44]  M. Rizvi,et al.  EMT in cervical cancer: its role in tumour progression and response to therapy. , 2015, Cancer letters.

[45]  Raghu Kalluri,et al.  The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. , 2009, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[46]  Li Yan,et al.  UV photopolymerized hydrogels with β-cyclodextrin moieties , 2008 .

[47]  A. Levine,et al.  Multiple roles of p53-related pathways in somatic cell reprogramming and stem cell differentiation. , 2012, Cancer research.

[48]  J. Park,et al.  Electromagnetic fields mediate efficient cell reprogramming into a pluripotent state. , 2014, ACS nano.

[49]  Youngsin Park,et al.  Cell reprogramming into the pluripotent state using graphene based substrates. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[50]  M. Dembo,et al.  Substrate flexibility regulates growth and apoptosis of normal but not transformed cells. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[51]  Jialiang Liang,et al.  A mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition initiates and is required for the nuclear reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[52]  Sheng Ding,et al.  Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic fibroblasts by Oct4 and Klf4 with small-molecule compounds. , 2008, Cell stem cell.