Protein Library Design and Screening

In designing protein libraries for selection, we must coordinate our capacity to create a large diversity of protein variants with the physical limitations of what we can actually screen. This chapter aims to bring the language of probabilities into the protein engineer's laboratory to answer some of our common questions: How can we most efficiently design a library? What fraction of the theoretical library diversity have we actually sampled at the end of the day? What is the probability of missing an individual of the library? Are the mutations present in the variants we have selected statistically meaningful or the product of random variation? The computation of these criteria throughout the process of experimental protein engineering will enable us to better design and evaluate the products of our libraries of protein variants.

[1]  X. Soberón,et al.  Orthogonal combinatorial mutagenesis: a codon-level combinatorial mutagenesis method useful for low multiplicity and amino acid-scanning protocols. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[2]  C D Maranas,et al.  Predicting crossover generation in DNA shuffling , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Fengzhu Sun Modeling DNA Shuffling , 1999, J. Comput. Biol..

[4]  C D Maranas,et al.  Modeling DNA mutation and recombination for directed evolution experiments. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  Robert V. Hogg,et al.  Probability and Statistical Inference , 1978, An R Companion for the Third Edition of The Fundamentals of Political Science Research.

[6]  Frances H. Arnold,et al.  Directed enzyme evolution : screening and selection methods , 2003 .

[7]  Wayne M Patrick,et al.  User-friendly algorithms for estimating completeness and diversity in randomized protein-encoding libraries. , 2003, Protein engineering.

[8]  M. Gribskov,et al.  The codon preference plot: graphic analysis of protein coding sequences and prediction of gene expression , 1984, Nucleic Acids Res..

[9]  F. Arnold,et al.  Strategies for the in vitro evolution of protein function: enzyme evolution by random recombination of improved sequences. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  A. Plückthun,et al.  Trinucleotide phosphoramidites: ideal reagents for the synthesis of mixed oligonucleotides for random mutagenesis. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[11]  Frances H. Arnold,et al.  Directed evolution library creation : methods and protocols , 2003 .

[12]  S. Ross A First Course in Probability , 1977 .

[13]  Joshua A Bittker,et al.  Directed evolution of protein enzymes using nonhomologous random recombination. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  F. Arnold,et al.  Directed Evolution Library Creation , 2003 .

[15]  Costas D Maranas,et al.  Predicting out-of-sequence reassembly in DNA shuffling. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.