Factors Affecting User Perception of a Spoken Language vs. Textual Search Interface: A Content Analysis

[1]  Niels Ole Bernsen,et al.  Designing Interactive Speech Systems , 1998, Springer London.

[2]  Marilyn A. Walker,et al.  An Application of Reinforcement Learning to Dialogue Strategy Selection in a Spoken Dialogue System for Email , 2000, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[3]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[4]  Diane J. Litman,et al.  Designing and evaluating a wizarded uncertainty-adaptive spoken dialogue tutoring system , 2011, Comput. Speech Lang..

[5]  Niels Ole Bernsen,et al.  Usability issues in spoken dialogue systems , 2000, Natural Language Engineering.

[6]  Ludovic Denoyer,et al.  The XML Wikipedia Corpus , 2006 .

[7]  Nitendra Rajput,et al.  A comparative study of speech and dialed input voice interfaces in rural India , 2009, CHI.

[8]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[9]  Fabio Crestani,et al.  Written versus spoken queries: A qualitative and quantitative comparative analysis , 2006 .

[10]  Xiaojun Yuan,et al.  What Users Prefer and Why: A User Study on Effective Presentation Styles of Opinion Summarization , 2015, INTERACT.

[11]  Marilyn A. Walker,et al.  Evaluating spoken dialogue agents with PARADISE: Two case studies , 1998, Comput. Speech Lang..

[12]  Marilyn A. Walker,et al.  Developing and Testing General Models of Spoken Dialogue System Peformance , 2000, LREC.

[13]  Andreas Nürnberger,et al.  Usability and perception of young users and adults on targeted web search engines , 2014, IIiX.

[14]  I. Brown.  Individual and Technological Factors Affecting Perceived Ease of Use of Web‐based Learning Technologies in a Developing Country , 2002, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..

[15]  G N Kenny,et al.  Comparison of keyboard, light pen and voice recognition as methods of data input , 1988, International journal of clinical monitoring and computing.

[16]  Pia Borlund,et al.  The IIR evaluation model: a framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems , 2003, Inf. Res..

[17]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[18]  Diane J. Litman,et al.  ITSPOKE: An Intelligent Tutoring Spoken Dialogue System , 2004, NAACL.

[19]  Magne Hallstein Johnsen,et al.  TABOR - a norwegian spoken dialogue system for bus travel information , 2000, INTERSPEECH.

[20]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Diane J. Litman,et al.  A user modeling-based performance analysis of a wizarded uncertainty-adaptive dialogue system corpus , 2009, INTERSPEECH.

[22]  Diane J. Litman,et al.  Adapting to Student Uncertainty Improves Tutoring Dialogues , 2009, AIED.

[23]  Brigitte Meillon,et al.  Design and evaluation of a smart home voice interface for the elderly: acceptability and objection aspects , 2011, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[24]  Niels Ole Bernsen,et al.  Wizard of Oz Simulation , 1998 .

[25]  C Kamm,et al.  User Interfaces for voice applications , 1994 .

[26]  Ludovic Denoyer,et al.  The Wikipedia XML corpus , 2006, SIGF.

[27]  Niels Ole Bernsen,et al.  Evaluation and usability of multimodal spoken language dialogue systems , 2004, Speech Commun..

[28]  Robert Graham,et al.  Towards a tool for the Subjective Assessment of Speech System Interfaces (SASSI) , 2000, Natural Language Engineering.

[29]  Joëlle Coutaz,et al.  Applying the Wizard of Oz Technique to the Study of Multimodal Systems , 1993, EWHCI.

[30]  Weijia Ni,et al.  Sentence complexity and input modality effects in sentence comprehension: an fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.