Preterm Preeclampsia Risk Modelling: Examining Hemodynamic, Biochemical, and Biophysical Markers Prior to Pregnancy

Preeclampsia (PE) is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal death globally and can lead to unplanned preterm birth. Predicting risk for preterm or early-onset PE, has been investigated primarily after conception, and particularly in the early and mid-gestational periods. However, there is a distinct clinical advantage in identifying individuals at risk for PE prior to conception, when a wider array of preventive interventions are available. In this work, we leverage machine learning techniques to identify potential pre-pregnancy biomarkers of PE in a sample of 80 women, 10 of whom were diagnosed with preterm preeclampsia during their subsequent pregnancy. We explore biomarkers derived from hemodynamic, biophysical, and biochemical measurements and several modeling approaches. A support vector machine (SVM) optimized with stochastic gradient descent yields the highest overall performance with ROC AUC and detection rates up to .88 and .70, respectively on subject-wise cross validation. The best performing models leverage biophysical and hemodynamic biomarkers. While preliminary, these results indicate the promise of a machine learning based approach for detecting individuals who are at risk for developing preterm PE before they become pregnant. These efforts may inform gestational planning and care, reducing risk for adverse PE-related outcomes.

[1]  Samantha R. Fox,et al.  How Much Data Is Enough? A Reliable Methodology to Examine Long-Term Wearable Data Acquisition in Gait and Postural Sway , 2022, Sensors.

[2]  Alison D. Gernand,et al.  Preconceptional and Periconceptional Pathways to Preeclampsia , 2022, Chesley's Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy.

[3]  D. Sahota,et al.  First trimester preeclampsia screening and prediction. , 2020, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  D. Grobbee,et al.  Systematic review of prediction models for gestational hypertension and preeclampsia , 2020, PloS one.

[5]  Yejin Park,et al.  Prediction model development of late-onset preeclampsia using machine learning-based methods , 2019, PloS one.

[6]  J. Cecatti,et al.  Preeclampsia in 2018: Revisiting Concepts, Physiopathology, and Prediction , 2018, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[7]  L. Poston,et al.  Prediction of Small for Gestational Age Infants in Healthy Nulliparous Women Using Clinical and Ultrasound Risk Factors Combined with Early Pregnancy Biomarkers , 2017, PloS one.

[8]  G. Badger,et al.  Differences in cardiovascular function comparing prior preeclamptics with nulliparous controls. , 2016, Pregnancy hypertension.

[9]  A. Baschat,et al.  Optimal first trimester preeclampsia prediction: a comparison of multimarker algorithm, risk profiles and their sequential application , 2016, Prenatal diagnosis.

[10]  D. Wright,et al.  Competing risks model in screening for preeclampsia by maternal characteristics and medical history. , 2015, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  Özge Tunçalp,et al.  Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. , 2014, The Lancet. Global health.

[12]  C. Ananth,et al.  Pre-eclampsia rates in the United States, 1980-2010: age-period-cohort analysis , 2013, BMJ.

[13]  G. Badger,et al.  Pulse Pressure and Arterial Compliance Prior to Pregnancy and the Development of Complicated Hypertension During Pregnancy , 2010, Reproductive Sciences.

[14]  G. Badger,et al.  Evidence for distinct preterm and term phenotypes of preeclampsia , 2010, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[15]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: screening by biophysical and biochemical markers at 11–13 weeks , 2010, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[16]  A. Franx,et al.  Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease in Women with a History of Pregnancy Complicated by Preeclampsia or Intrauterine Growth Restriction , 2007, Hypertension in pregnancy.

[17]  L. Vatten,et al.  Is pre‐eclampsia more than one disease? , 2004, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[18]  J. Karemaker,et al.  Serial assessment of cardiovascular control shows early signs of developing pre-eclampsia , 2004, Journal of hypertension.

[19]  C. Lagazio,et al.  Individual longitudinal patterns in biochemical and hematological markers for the early prediction of pre-eclampsia , 2002, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.