Towards improved floor spectra estimates for seismic design

Current codes incorporate simplified methods for the prediction of acceleration demands on secondary structural and non-structural elements at different levels of a building. While the use of simple analysis methods should be advocated, damage to both secondary structural and non-structural elements in recent earthquakes have highlighted the need for improved design procedures for such elements. In order to take a step towards the formation of accurate but simplified methods of predicting floor spectra, this work examines the floor spectra on elastic and inelastic single-degree of freedom systems subject to accelerograms of varying seismic intensity. After identifying the factors that appear to affect the shape and intensity of acceleration demands on secondary structural and non-structural elements, a new series of calibrated equations are proposed to predict floor spectra on single degree of freedom supporting structures. The approach uses concepts of dynamics and inelasticity to define the shape and intensity of the floor spectra at different levels of damping. The results of non-linear time-history analyses of a series of single- degree of freedom supporting structures indicate that the new methodology is very promising. Future research will aim to extend the methodology to multi-degree of freedom supporting structures and run additional verification studies.

[1]  Yukako Nakagami.  Probabilistic Dynamics of Wind Excitation on Glass Facade , 2003 .

[2]  Rajesh P. Dhakal,et al.  DAMAGE TO NON-STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS AND CONTENTS IN 2010 DARFIELD EARTHQUAKE , 2010 .

[3]  I. Towhata.  Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering , 2008 .

[4]  V. Gupta,et al.  A MODAL COMBINATION RULE FOR PEAK FLOOR ACCELERATIONS IN MULTISTORIED BUILDINGS , 2008 .

[5]  Gian Michele Calvi,et al.  Seismic design of frame-wall structures , 2006 .

[6]  W. Thomson.  Theory of vibration with applications , 1965 .

[7]  Roberto Villaverde,et al.  Seismic Design of Secondary Structures: State of the Art , 1997 .

[8]  Andre Filiatrault,et al.  EQUIVALENT ELASTIC MODELING FOR THE DIRECT- DISPLACEMENT-BASED SEISMIC DESIGN OF WOOD STRUCTURES , 2004 .

[9]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  Generation of floor response spectra including oscillator‐structure interaction , 1985 .

[10]  José I. Restrepo,et al.  Earthquake‐induced floor horizontal accelerations in buildings , 2002 .

[11]  Mjn Priestley,et al.  Direct displacement-based seismic design , 2005 .

[12]  W. C. Schnobrich,et al.  Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Frame Wall Structures for Strong Motion Earthquakes , 1978 .

[13]  Carvalho,et al.  Designers' Guide to EN 1998-1 and 1998-5. Eurocode 8: Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistant Structures , 2005 .

[14]  William Emerson,et al.  The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy , 2013 .

[15]  Edward Cohen,et al.  Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures , 1990 .

[16]  R. Clough,et al.  Dynamics Of Structures , 1975 .

[17]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Quantitative Classification of Near-Fault Ground Motions Using Wavelet Analysis , 2007 .