A Heteroscedastic Generalized Extreme Value Discrete Choice Model

Of the commonly used discrete choice models, the probit class allows flexible covariance structures for disturbances but is computationally burdensome for problems with more than a few alternatives. The generalized extreme value (GEV) class, including the widely used logit and nested logit models, has the advantage of computational ease but suffers in general from the restriction of homoscedastic disturbances. This article generalizes the GEV class to allow heteroscedastic disturbances across decision makers as well as across choice alternatives. The resulting models include the heteroscedastic extreme value model as a special case, which is a generalized logit model with heteroscedasticity across choice alternatives. Particular attention is paid to the heteroscedastic logit and nested logit models because of their widespread use in practice. An empirical application reanalyzing data from the 1980 presidential election tests the hypothesis of information-induced heteroscedasticity across voters and finds support for a heteroscedastic logit model that reveals stronger effects of voter information on the turnout decision than suggested by the original standard logit model in Ordeshook and Zeng.

[1]  A. Agresti Logit Models and Related Quasi-Symmetric Log-Linear Models for Comparing Responses to Similar Items in a Survey , 1995 .

[2]  Greg J. Duncan,et al.  A Comparison of Choice-Based Multinomial and Nested Logit Models: The Family Structure and Welfare Use Decisions of Divorced or Separated Women , 1988 .

[3]  Modeling Symmetry, Asymmetry, and Change in Ordered Scales with Midpoints Using Adjacent Category Logit Models for Discrete Data , 1997 .

[4]  D. Wise,et al.  A CONDITIONAL PROBIT MODEL FOR QUALITATIVE CHOICE: DISCRETE DECISIONS RECOGNIZING INTERDEPENDENCE AND HETEROGENEOUS PREFERENCES' , 1978 .

[5]  D. S. Bunch,et al.  Estimability in the Multinomial Probit Model , 1989 .

[6]  Langche Zeng,et al.  Rational Voters and Strategic Voting , 1997 .

[7]  A. Harvey Estimating Regression Models with Multiplicative Heteroscedasticity , 1976 .

[8]  R. McKelvey,et al.  A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables , 1975 .

[9]  J. Logan,et al.  Opportunity and Choice in Socially Structured Labor Markets , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  Joel L. Horowitz,et al.  Identification and diagnosis of specification errors in the multinomial logit model , 1981 .

[11]  C. Bhat A heteroscedastic extreme value model of intercity travel mode choice , 1995 .

[12]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Specification Error in Probit Models , 1985 .

[13]  P. Wright Union membership and coverage: a study using the nested multinomial logit model , 1995 .

[14]  Trudy Ann Cameron,et al.  A Nested Logit Model of Energy Conservation Activity by Owners of Existing Single Family Dwellings , 1985 .

[15]  Evangelos M. Falaris,et al.  A Nested Logit Migration Model with Selectivity , 1987 .

[16]  Using a Multinomial Logit Specification to Model Two Interdependent Processes with an Empirical Application , 1997 .

[17]  Jason Wittenberg,et al.  Making the Most Of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation , 2000 .

[18]  Thomas R. Palfrey,et al.  The Relationship Between Information, Ideology, and Voting Behavior , 1987 .

[19]  James G. MacKinnon,et al.  Convenient Specification Tests for Logit and Probit Models , 1984 .

[20]  D. McFadden A Method of Simulated Moments for Estimation of Discrete Response Models Without Numerical Integration , 1989 .

[21]  K. Small A Discrete Choice Model for Ordered Alternatives , 1987 .

[22]  Jerome H. Black,et al.  The Multicandidate Calculus of Voting: Application to Canadian Federal Elections , 1978 .

[23]  A. Börsch-Supan On the compatibility of nested logit models with utility maximization , 1990 .