Analysis and modelling of gravity- and piston coring based on soil mechanics

The effects of gravity- and piston corers on the dimensional accuracy of marine sediment cores is analysed using principles of soil mechanics. A model for the coring process is built around the feedback that arises and develops between the core barrel and the sampled sediment. This model for sediment response is applied to different hypothetical coring scenarios, which are then compared to real examples, providing insights into the specific effects of each sampling method and the development of these effects down-core. Four cores from a single location on the Iberian Margin are found to contain stratigraphically intact successions that differ in length by a factor of up to 2.7, due solely to the different effects of each coring method. These dimensional discrepancies are attributed to the combined effects of ‘over-sampling’ in the upper portions of the piston cores (due to cable rebound causing upward piston acceleration), and ‘under-sampling’ dominant in the basal portions of the open-barrel gravity-type cores. It is suggested that heavier piston corers, deployed on longer, lighter cables, are prone to greater over-sampling ratios over longer stratigraphic intervals, due to the increased likelihood and extent of cable rebound. Cable rebound may also give rise to double penetration of gravity corers, resulting in repeated stratigraphic intervals. Knowledge of the dimensional accuracy of marine sediment cores is essential to an evaluation of past sedimentation rates, and hence interpretations of past depositional processes. It is therefore essential that we recognise the sampling effects of each coring method, and their variability down-core, lest coring artefacts be interpreted as sedimentary signals. Different core types may be more suited to different palaeoceanographic investigations. Hence, failing the development of a practical cable-deployed recoilless piston corer, a combination of a variety of core types will permit the best acquisition of the in situ stratigraphic truth. Our results suggest that a large-diameter (Dc∼20–30 cm) square-barrel gravity corer for the top 10–12 m combined with a cylindrical piston corer below ∼10 m may provide the least deformed material.

[1]  Rainer Zahn,et al.  Implications for sedimentation changes on the Iberian margin over the last two glacial/interglacial transitions from (230Thexcess)0 systematics , 1999 .

[2]  M. A. Storms.  Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) Deep Sea Coring Techniques , 1990 .

[3]  S. Blomqvist.  Reliability of core sampling of soft bottom sediment-an in situ study , 1985 .

[4]  D. Eisma,et al.  Advantages of light-weight kevlar rope for ocean bottom sampling with the piston corer and box corer , 1988 .

[5]  M. Bacon.  Glacial to interglacial changes in carbonate and clay sedimentation in the Atlantic Ocean estimated from 230Th measurements , 1984 .

[6]  N. Shackleton,et al.  Rock magnetic detection of distal ice-rafted debries: clue for the identification of Heinrich layers on the Portuguese margin , 2000 .

[7]  I Nick McCave,et al.  Climatic and oceanographic changes in the Northeast Atlantic reflected by magnetic properties of sediments deposited on the Portuguese Margin during the last 340 ka , 2002 .

[8]  R. Edwards,et al.  High precision glacial-interglacial benthic foraminiferal Sr/Ca records from the eastern equatorial Atlantic Ocean and Caribbean Sea , 2001 .

[9]  G. Wollin,et al.  Correlation of six cores from the equatorial Atlantic and the Caribbean , 1956 .

[10]  Seung-Rae Lee,et al.  Behavior of Soil Plug in Open-Ended Model Piles Driven into Sands , 1993 .

[11]  B Kullenberg,et al.  The piston core sampler , 1947 .

[12]  M. Hall,et al.  Paleoceanographic reconstructions from planktonic foraminifera off the Iberian Margin: Temperature, salinity, and Heinrich events , 1999 .

[13]  D. Ross,et al.  Comparison of upper parts of some piston cores with simultaneously collected open-barrel cores☆ , 1967 .

[14]  Mark Randolph,et al.  One-dimensional analysis of soil plugs in pipe piles , 1991 .

[15]  H. Poulos,et al.  Elastic solutions for soil and rock mechanics , 1973 .

[16]  Mark Randolph,et al.  The plugging behaviour of driven and jacked piles in sand , 1997 .

[17]  H. Christian,et al.  Problems with piston core sampling: Mechanical and geochemical diagnosis , 1994 .

[18]  I. N. McCave,et al.  A redesigned kasten core barrel and sampling technique , 1990 .

[19]  N. Silverberg,et al.  Gravity core shortening and pore water chemical gradients , 1982 .

[20]  K. O. Emery,et al.  Gravity coring instrument and mechanics of sediment coring , 1941 .

[21]  Armand J. Silva,et al.  Geotechnical properties of deep sea sediments: Bermuda rise , 1976 .

[22]  P. Weaver,et al.  Detection of Repenetration and Sediment Disturbance in Open-Barrel Gravity Cores: RESEARCH-METHOD PAPER , 1983 .

[23]  P. Weaver,et al.  Current methods for obtaining, logging and splitting marine sediment cores , 1990 .

[24]  F. Mccoy.  Photographic analysis of coring , 1980 .

[25]  Armand J. Silva,et al.  Geotechnical properties of ocean sediments recovered with the Giant Piston Corer: Blake—Bahama Outer Ridge☆ , 1979 .

[26]  I. N. McCave,et al.  Palaeocurrent reconstruction, sediment and thorium focussing on the Iberian margin over the last 140 ka , 2000 .

[27]  W. R. Parker.  Quality control in mud coring , 1991 .

[28]  K. Emery,et al.  SHORTENING OF SEDIMENT CORES COLLECTED IN OPEN BARREL GRAVITY CORERS1 , 1964 .

[29]  G G Mayerhof,et al.  Bearing Capacity and Settlement of Pile Foundations , 1976 .

[30]  F. Mccoy.  Mid-Core Flow-In: Implications for Stretched Stratigraphic Sections In Piston Cores: RESEARCH METHOD PAPER , 1985 .

[31]  G. G. Meyerhof.  The Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Foudations , 1951 .

[32]  W. R. Parker,et al.  Observation of corer penetration and sample entry during gravity coring , 1990 .

[33]  Armand J. Silva,et al.  A giant piston-corer , 1973 .

[34]  N. Shackleton,et al.  Phase relationships between millennial‐scale events 64,000–24,000 years ago , 2000 .