Production and perception of V1V2 described in terms of formant transition rates

Vowels can be produced with static articulatory configurations leading to stable formant frequencies (targets). Here, an algorithm computes area functions according to the criterion of minimal deformation leading to maximal acoustic variations. Within this evolutionary dynamics, the deformations of the tube are not performed to reach targets, unknown during the process, but to move in the acoustic space in order to increase acoustic contrast. The corresponding formant trajectories in the acoustic space can be described in terms of formant transition rates. For example, following this dynamic approach, to produce [ae] from [a], the transition rates of F1 and F2 are necessary and sufficient to represent [e] and at the very beginning of the transition and throughout the transition there is sufficient information to detect [e]. This assertion means that the transition duration is more or less constant. Studies of V1V2 production and perception characterized by their formant transition rates are presented. Suc...

[1]  I. Pollack,et al.  Detection of rate of change of auditory frequency. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Gunnar Fant,et al.  Acoustic Theory Of Speech Production , 1960 .

[3]  J. Jenkins,et al.  Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  M R Schroeder,et al.  Flat-spectrum speech. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  S. Furui On the role of spectral transition for speech perception. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  Vocal-tract characteristics of the stop cognates. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Sorin Dusan,et al.  On the relevance of some spectral and temporal patterns for vowel classification , 2007, Speech Commun..

[8]  Pierre L. Divenyi Frequency change velocity and acceleration detector: A bird or a red herring? , 2005 .

[9]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  On the role of formant transitions in vowel recognition. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  F. Pellegrino,et al.  Signal dynamics in the production and perception of vowels , 2010 .

[11]  Linda Polka,et al.  Asymmetries in vowel perception , 2003, Speech Commun..

[12]  René Carré,et al.  Vowel-Vowel Production: The Distinctive Region Model (DRM) and Vowel Harmony , 1995 .

[13]  R. Verbrugge,et al.  Talker‐independent information for vowel identity , 1980 .

[14]  T. Gay Effect of speaking rate on vowel formant movements. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .

[16]  R. Carré Signal dynamics in the production and perception of vowels , 2010 .

[17]  W. Strange Evolving theories of vowel perception. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Carol A. Fowler,et al.  Coarticulation and theories of extrinsic timing , 1980 .

[19]  René Carré,et al.  SPEECH DYNAMICS: EPISTEMOLOGICAL ASPECTS , 2007 .

[20]  René Carré,et al.  Perception of Vowel-to-Vowel Transitions with Different Formant Trajectories , 2001, Phonetica.