The effect of marker placement around the elbow on calculated elbow extension during bowling in cricket

Abstract The elbow extension angle during bowling in cricket may be calculated from the positions of markers attached around the shoulder, elbow and wrist using an automated laboratory-based motion analysis system. The effects of two elbow-marker sets were compared. In the first, a pair of markers was placed medially and laterally close to the condyles while in the second a triad of markers was placed on the back of the upper arm close to the elbow. The root mean square (RMS) difference in elbow extension angle between the two methods at four key instants was 8° for 12 fast bowlers and 4° for 12 spin bowlers. When evaluated against video estimates of the elbow extension angle for the fast bowlers, the elbow extension angle calculated using the pair method had an RMS error of 2° while the triad method had an RMS error of 8°. The corresponding errors for the spin bowlers were 3° and 5°, respectively. It is thought that the greater errors associated with the triad is a consequence of soft tissue movement in this dynamic activity. This is consistent with the finding of greater error for the fast bowlers compared with the spin bowlers.

[1]  Theofano Eftaxiopoulou,et al.  The effect of digitisation of the humeral epicondyles on quantifying elbow kinematics during cricket bowling , 2013, Journal of sports sciences.

[2]  A Leardini,et al.  Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: experimental artefacts. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[3]  Angelo Cappello,et al.  In vivo validation of a new technique that compensates for soft tissue artefact in the upper-arm: preliminary results. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[4]  David G. Lloyd,et al.  Effects of different technical coordinate system definitions on the three dimensional representation of the glenohumeral joint centre , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[5]  D G Lloyd,et al.  An upper limb kinematic model for the examination of cricket bowling: A case study of Mutiah Muralitharan , 2000, Journal of sports sciences.

[6]  Mark A King,et al.  Quantifying Elbow Extension and Elbow Hyperextension in Cricket Bowling: A case study of Jenny Gunn , 2012, Journal of sports sciences.

[7]  David G Lloyd,et al.  Can the effect of soft tissue artifact be eliminated in upper-arm internal-external rotation? , 2011, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[8]  Bruce C Elliott,et al.  System and modelling errors in motion analysis: implications for the measurement of the elbow angle in cricket bowling. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Mickaël Begon,et al.  Limitations of functionally determined joint centers for the analysis of athletic human movement: a case study of the upper limb. , 2009, Journal of applied biomechanics.