Thermal phenotypic plasticity of pre- and post-copulatory male harm buffers sexual conflict in wild Drosophila melanogaster
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Roberto García‐Roa,et al. Male harm suppresses female fitness to affect the dynamics of adaptation and evolutionary rescue , 2022, bioRxiv.
[2] R. Bonduriansky,et al. Sperm depletion in relation to developmental nutrition and genotype in Drosophila melanogaster , 2021, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[3] H. Rundle,et al. On Male Harm: How It Is Measured and How It Evolves in Different Environments , 2021, The American Naturalist.
[4] Aleksandra Łukasiewicz,et al. Sexual conflict in a changing environment , 2021, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[5] T. Janicke,et al. Stronger net selection on males across animals , 2021, bioRxiv.
[6] R. Dukas. Natural history of social and sexual behavior in fruit flies , 2020, Scientific Reports.
[7] D. Stec,et al. Heat wave effects on the behavior and life-history traits of sedentary antlions , 2020, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.
[8] Kwang Pum Lee,et al. Combined effects of temperature and macronutrient balance on life-history traits in Drosophila melanogaster: implications for life-history trade-offs and fundamental niche , 2020, Oecologia.
[9] R. Dukas,et al. Plasticity in male mating behavior modulates female life history in fruit flies , 2020, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[10] I. Sepil,et al. Structural variation in Drosophila melanogaster spermathecal ducts and its association with sperm competition dynamics , 2019, bioRxiv.
[11] A. Bretman,et al. Divergent allocation of sperm and the seminal proteome along a competition gradient in Drosophila melanogaster , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[12] A. Bretman,et al. Exposure to males, but not receipt of sex peptide, accelerates functional ageing in female fruit flies , 2019, Functional Ecology.
[13] Heather L Malek,et al. Spatial environmental complexity mediates sexual conflict and sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster , 2019, Ecology and evolution.
[14] Roberto García‐Roa,et al. The ecology of sexual conflict: Temperature variation in the social environment can drastically modulate male harm to females , 2019, Functional Ecology.
[15] Roberto García‐Roa,et al. Temperature as a modulator of sexual selection , 2018, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[16] G. Arnqvist,et al. Sexual selection, environmental robustness, and evolutionary demography of maladapted populations: A test using experimental evolution in seed beetles , 2018, bioRxiv.
[17] J. Perry,et al. Sexual conflict in its ecological setting , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[18] E. Svensson,et al. Climatic factors and species range position predict sexually antagonistic selection across taxa , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[19] H. Rundle,et al. The effects of male harm vary with female quality and environmental complexity in Drosophila melanogaster , 2018, Biology Letters.
[20] H. Rundle,et al. Competition for mates and the improvement of nonsexual fitness , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[21] Hanna M. Bensch,et al. Sexual conflict and ecology: Species composition and male density interact to reduce male mating harassment and increase female survival , 2018, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[22] Stephen E. Fick,et al. WorldClim 2: new 1‐km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas , 2017 .
[23] A. Antunes,et al. Parabolic variation in sexual selection intensity across the range of a cold‐water pipefish: implications for susceptibility to climate change , 2017, Global change biology.
[24] H. Rundle,et al. The physical environment mediates male harm and its effect on selection in females , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[25] A. Le Rouzic,et al. Male accessory gland proteins affect differentially female sexual receptivity and remating in closely related Drosophila species. , 2017, Journal of insect physiology.
[26] G. Arnqvist,et al. Intralocus Sexual Conflict and the Tragedy of the Commons in Seed Beetles , 2016, The American Naturalist.
[27] T. Janicke,et al. Darwinian sex roles confirmed across the animal kingdom , 2016, Science Advances.
[28] J. Perry,et al. Related male Drosophila melanogaster reared together as larvae fight less and sire longer lived daughters , 2015, Ecology and evolution.
[29] S. Gavrilets. Is sexual conflict an "engine of speciation"? , 2014, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.
[30] M. Ghahramani. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods the Information Criterion the Information Criterion , 2022 .
[31] G. Arnqvist,et al. INTRALOCUS SEXUAL CONFLICT AND ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS , 2014, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[32] H. Rundle,et al. The ecology of sexual conflict: ecologically dependent parallel evolution of male harm and female resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2014, Ecology letters.
[33] Felicity Allen,et al. Within-group male relatedness reduces harm to females in Drosophila , 2014, Nature.
[34] Christine W. Miller,et al. Sexual selection in complex environments. , 2014, Annual review of entomology.
[35] K. Reinhardt,et al. Functions, diversity, and evolution of traumatic mating , 2013, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[36] T. Chapman,et al. COSTS AND BENEFITS OF LIFETIME EXPOSURE TO MATING RIVALS IN MALE DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER , 2013, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[37] J. Perry,et al. The seminal symphony: how to compose an ejaculate. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[38] E. Forsgren,et al. Effects of habitat complexity on mating behavior and mating success in a marine fish , 2013 .
[39] R. Bonduriansky. Sexual Selection and Conflict as Engines of Ecological Diversification , 2011, The American Naturalist.
[40] M. Wolfner,et al. Protein-specific manipulation of ejaculate composition in response to female mating status in Drosophila melanogaster , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[41] D. Rankin,et al. Sexual Conflict and the Tragedy of the Commons , 2011, The American Naturalist.
[42] Dave T. Gerrard,et al. QUANTIFYING THE LIFE‐HISTORY RESPONSE TO INCREASED MALE EXPOSURE IN FEMALE DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[43] G. Arnqvist,et al. Sexual conflict and the gender load: correlated evolution between population fitness and sexual dimorphism in seed beetles , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[44] T. Uller,et al. Towards an evolutionary ecology of sexual traits. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[45] T. Chapman,et al. Exposure to rivals and plastic responses to sperm competition in Drosophila melanogaster , 2010 .
[46] Alain F. Zuur,et al. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems , 2010 .
[47] T. Chapman,et al. Female nutritional status determines the magnitude and sign of responses to a male ejaculate signal in Drosophila melanogaster , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[48] J. Perry,et al. The conditional economics of sexual conflict , 2009, Biology Letters.
[49] T. Chapman,et al. Seminal Fluid Protein Allocation and Male Reproductive Success , 2009, Current Biology.
[50] T. Chapman,et al. Plastic responses of male Drosophila melanogaster to the level of sperm competition increase male reproductive fitness , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[51] S. Chenoweth,et al. Intralocus sexual conflict. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[52] R. Bonduriansky,et al. Sexual selection, sexual conflict and the evolution of ageing and life span , 2008 .
[53] Nicholas K. Priest,et al. Mating Frequency and Inclusive Fitness in Drosophila melanogaster , 2007, The American Naturalist.
[54] T. Chapman,et al. EJACULATE DEPLETION PATTERNS EVOLVE IN RESPONSE TO EXPERIMENTAL MANIPULATION OF SEX RATIO IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[55] J. Clobert,et al. Sex ratio bias, male aggression, and population collapse in lizards. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[56] D. Hosken,et al. Sexual conflict , 2005, Current Biology.
[57] H. Schulenburg,et al. Shooting darts: co-evolution and counter-adaptation in hermaphroditic snails , 2005, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[58] T. Chapman,et al. Sex Peptide Causes Mating Costs in Female Drosophila melanogaster , 2005, Current Biology.
[59] T. Chapman,et al. FEMALE RESISTANCE TO MALE HARM EVOLVES IN RESPONSE TO MANIPULATION OF SEXUAL CONFLICT , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[60] L. Partridge,et al. The sex peptide of Drosophila melanogaster: Female post-mating responses analyzed by using RNA interference , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[61] H. Kokko,et al. Reproductive timing and individual fitness , 2002 .
[62] M. Siva-jothy,et al. Genital damage, kicking and early death , 2000, Nature.
[63] G. Arnqvist,et al. Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[64] G. Arnqvist,et al. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects , 2000, Animal Behaviour.
[65] W. Rice,et al. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[66] M. Wolfner,et al. Tokens of love: functions and regulation of Drosophila male accessory gland products. , 1997, Insect biochemistry and molecular biology.
[67] D. Kleinbaum. Survival Analysis: A Self-Learning Text , 1997 .
[68] L. Partridge,et al. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products , 1995, Nature.
[69] L. Partridge,et al. A cost of mating in female fruitflies , 1989, Nature.
[70] S. Bottoms,et al. On Ecology , 1987, The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America.
[71] M. Daly. The Cost of Mating , 1978, The American Naturalist.
[72] A. Chandley,et al. Timing of Spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster using Tritiated Thymidine , 1962, Nature.
[73] U. Candolin. Sexual Selection and Sexual Conflict , 2019, Encyclopedia of Ecology.
[74] F. Mery,et al. Sexual harassment induces a temporary fitness cost but does not constrain the acquisition of environmental information in fruit flies , 2016, Biology Letters.
[75] Daniel E. Bath. Characterization of the neuronal mechanisms that mediate temporal control of the courtship behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster , 2014 .
[76] M. Wolfner,et al. Molecular social interactions: Drosophila melanogaster seminal fluid proteins as a case study. , 2009, Advances in genetics.
[77] G. Arnqvist,et al. beetles between population fitness and sexual dimorphism in seed Sexual conflict and the gender load : correlated evolution , 2009 .
[78] H. Kokko,et al. Sexy to die for? Sexual selection and the risk of extinction , 2003 .
[79] W. Kennington,et al. A simple method to achieve consistent larval density in bottle cultures. , 2001 .
[80] L. Partridge,et al. Non-mating costs of exposure to males in female Drosophila melanogaster , 1990 .
[81] T. E. Moore,et al. Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects , 1979 .
[82] K. Connolly,et al. Rejection Responses By Female Drosophila Melanogaster : Their Ontogeny, Causality and Effects Upon the Behaviour of the Courting Male , 1973 .
[83] A. Manning,et al. The Courtship of Drosophila Melanogaster , 1955 .