Thermal phenotypic plasticity of pre- and post-copulatory male harm buffers sexual conflict in wild Drosophila melanogaster

Strong sexual selection frequently leads to sexual conflict and ensuing male harm, whereby males increase their reproductive success at the expense of harming females. Male harm is a widespread evolutionary phenomenon with a strong bearing on population viability. Thus, understanding how it unfolds in the wild is a current priority. Here, we sampled a wild Drosophila melanogaster population and studied male harm across the normal range of temperatures under which it reproduces optimally in nature by comparing female lifetime reproductive success and underlying male harm mechanisms under monogamy (i.e., low male competition/harm) vs. polyandry (i.e., high male competition/harm). While females had equal lifetime reproductive success across temperatures under monogamy, polyandry resulted in a maximum decrease of female fitness at 24°C (35%), reducing its impact at both 20°C (22%), and 28°C (10%). Furthermore, female fitness components and pre- (i.e., harassment) and post-copulatory (i.e., ejaculate toxicity) mechanisms of male harm were asymmetrically affected by temperature. At 20°C, male harassment of females was reduced, and polyandry accelerated female actuarial ageing. In contrast, the effect of mating on female receptivity (a component of ejaculate toxicity) was affected at 28°C, where the mating costs for females decreased and polyandry mostly resulted in accelerated reproductive ageing. We thus show that, across a natural thermal range, sexual conflict processes and their effects on female fitness components are plastic and complex. As a result, the net effect of male harm on overall population viability is likely to be lower than previously surmised. We discuss how such plasticity may affect selection, adaptation and, ultimately, evolutionary rescue under a warming climate.

[1]  Roberto García‐Roa,et al.  Male harm suppresses female fitness to affect the dynamics of adaptation and evolutionary rescue , 2022, bioRxiv.

[2]  R. Bonduriansky,et al.  Sperm depletion in relation to developmental nutrition and genotype in Drosophila melanogaster , 2021, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  H. Rundle,et al.  On Male Harm: How It Is Measured and How It Evolves in Different Environments , 2021, The American Naturalist.

[4]  Aleksandra Łukasiewicz,et al.  Sexual conflict in a changing environment , 2021, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[5]  T. Janicke,et al.  Stronger net selection on males across animals , 2021, bioRxiv.

[6]  R. Dukas Natural history of social and sexual behavior in fruit flies , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[7]  D. Stec,et al.  Heat wave effects on the behavior and life-history traits of sedentary antlions , 2020, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.

[8]  Kwang Pum Lee,et al.  Combined effects of temperature and macronutrient balance on life-history traits in Drosophila melanogaster: implications for life-history trade-offs and fundamental niche , 2020, Oecologia.

[9]  R. Dukas,et al.  Plasticity in male mating behavior modulates female life history in fruit flies , 2020, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  I. Sepil,et al.  Structural variation in Drosophila melanogaster spermathecal ducts and its association with sperm competition dynamics , 2019, bioRxiv.

[11]  A. Bretman,et al.  Divergent allocation of sperm and the seminal proteome along a competition gradient in Drosophila melanogaster , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  A. Bretman,et al.  Exposure to males, but not receipt of sex peptide, accelerates functional ageing in female fruit flies , 2019, Functional Ecology.

[13]  Heather L Malek,et al.  Spatial environmental complexity mediates sexual conflict and sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster , 2019, Ecology and evolution.

[14]  Roberto García‐Roa,et al.  The ecology of sexual conflict: Temperature variation in the social environment can drastically modulate male harm to females , 2019, Functional Ecology.

[15]  Roberto García‐Roa,et al.  Temperature as a modulator of sexual selection , 2018, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[16]  G. Arnqvist,et al.  Sexual selection, environmental robustness, and evolutionary demography of maladapted populations: A test using experimental evolution in seed beetles , 2018, bioRxiv.

[17]  J. Perry,et al.  Sexual conflict in its ecological setting , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  E. Svensson,et al.  Climatic factors and species range position predict sexually antagonistic selection across taxa , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  H. Rundle,et al.  The effects of male harm vary with female quality and environmental complexity in Drosophila melanogaster , 2018, Biology Letters.

[20]  H. Rundle,et al.  Competition for mates and the improvement of nonsexual fitness , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Hanna M. Bensch,et al.  Sexual conflict and ecology: Species composition and male density interact to reduce male mating harassment and increase female survival , 2018, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[22]  Stephen E. Fick,et al.  WorldClim 2: new 1‐km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas , 2017 .

[23]  A. Antunes,et al.  Parabolic variation in sexual selection intensity across the range of a cold‐water pipefish: implications for susceptibility to climate change , 2017, Global change biology.

[24]  H. Rundle,et al.  The physical environment mediates male harm and its effect on selection in females , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  A. Le Rouzic,et al.  Male accessory gland proteins affect differentially female sexual receptivity and remating in closely related Drosophila species. , 2017, Journal of insect physiology.

[26]  G. Arnqvist,et al.  Intralocus Sexual Conflict and the Tragedy of the Commons in Seed Beetles , 2016, The American Naturalist.

[27]  T. Janicke,et al.  Darwinian sex roles confirmed across the animal kingdom , 2016, Science Advances.

[28]  J. Perry,et al.  Related male Drosophila melanogaster reared together as larvae fight less and sire longer lived daughters , 2015, Ecology and evolution.

[29]  S. Gavrilets Is sexual conflict an "engine of speciation"? , 2014, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[30]  M. Ghahramani Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods the Information Criterion the Information Criterion , 2022 .

[31]  G. Arnqvist,et al.  INTRALOCUS SEXUAL CONFLICT AND ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS , 2014, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  H. Rundle,et al.  The ecology of sexual conflict: ecologically dependent parallel evolution of male harm and female resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2014, Ecology letters.

[33]  Felicity Allen,et al.  Within-group male relatedness reduces harm to females in Drosophila , 2014, Nature.

[34]  Christine W. Miller,et al.  Sexual selection in complex environments. , 2014, Annual review of entomology.

[35]  K. Reinhardt,et al.  Functions, diversity, and evolution of traumatic mating , 2013, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[36]  T. Chapman,et al.  COSTS AND BENEFITS OF LIFETIME EXPOSURE TO MATING RIVALS IN MALE DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER , 2013, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[37]  J. Perry,et al.  The seminal symphony: how to compose an ejaculate. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[38]  E. Forsgren,et al.  Effects of habitat complexity on mating behavior and mating success in a marine fish , 2013 .

[39]  R. Bonduriansky Sexual Selection and Conflict as Engines of Ecological Diversification , 2011, The American Naturalist.

[40]  M. Wolfner,et al.  Protein-specific manipulation of ejaculate composition in response to female mating status in Drosophila melanogaster , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  D. Rankin,et al.  Sexual Conflict and the Tragedy of the Commons , 2011, The American Naturalist.

[42]  Dave T. Gerrard,et al.  QUANTIFYING THE LIFE‐HISTORY RESPONSE TO INCREASED MALE EXPOSURE IN FEMALE DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[43]  G. Arnqvist,et al.  Sexual conflict and the gender load: correlated evolution between population fitness and sexual dimorphism in seed beetles , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  T. Uller,et al.  Towards an evolutionary ecology of sexual traits. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[45]  T. Chapman,et al.  Exposure to rivals and plastic responses to sperm competition in Drosophila melanogaster , 2010 .

[46]  Alain F. Zuur,et al.  A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems , 2010 .

[47]  T. Chapman,et al.  Female nutritional status determines the magnitude and sign of responses to a male ejaculate signal in Drosophila melanogaster , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[48]  J. Perry,et al.  The conditional economics of sexual conflict , 2009, Biology Letters.

[49]  T. Chapman,et al.  Seminal Fluid Protein Allocation and Male Reproductive Success , 2009, Current Biology.

[50]  T. Chapman,et al.  Plastic responses of male Drosophila melanogaster to the level of sperm competition increase male reproductive fitness , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  S. Chenoweth,et al.  Intralocus sexual conflict. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[52]  R. Bonduriansky,et al.  Sexual selection, sexual conflict and the evolution of ageing and life span , 2008 .

[53]  Nicholas K. Priest,et al.  Mating Frequency and Inclusive Fitness in Drosophila melanogaster , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[54]  T. Chapman,et al.  EJACULATE DEPLETION PATTERNS EVOLVE IN RESPONSE TO EXPERIMENTAL MANIPULATION OF SEX RATIO IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[55]  J. Clobert,et al.  Sex ratio bias, male aggression, and population collapse in lizards. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  D. Hosken,et al.  Sexual conflict , 2005, Current Biology.

[57]  H. Schulenburg,et al.  Shooting darts: co-evolution and counter-adaptation in hermaphroditic snails , 2005, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[58]  T. Chapman,et al.  Sex Peptide Causes Mating Costs in Female Drosophila melanogaster , 2005, Current Biology.

[59]  T. Chapman,et al.  FEMALE RESISTANCE TO MALE HARM EVOLVES IN RESPONSE TO MANIPULATION OF SEXUAL CONFLICT , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[60]  L. Partridge,et al.  The sex peptide of Drosophila melanogaster: Female post-mating responses analyzed by using RNA interference , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  H. Kokko,et al.  Reproductive timing and individual fitness , 2002 .

[62]  M. Siva-jothy,et al.  Genital damage, kicking and early death , 2000, Nature.

[63]  G. Arnqvist,et al.  Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[64]  G. Arnqvist,et al.  The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[65]  W. Rice,et al.  Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[66]  M. Wolfner,et al.  Tokens of love: functions and regulation of Drosophila male accessory gland products. , 1997, Insect biochemistry and molecular biology.

[67]  D. Kleinbaum Survival Analysis: A Self-Learning Text , 1997 .

[68]  L. Partridge,et al.  Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products , 1995, Nature.

[69]  L. Partridge,et al.  A cost of mating in female fruitflies , 1989, Nature.

[70]  S. Bottoms,et al.  On Ecology , 1987, The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America.

[71]  M. Daly The Cost of Mating , 1978, The American Naturalist.

[72]  A. Chandley,et al.  Timing of Spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster using Tritiated Thymidine , 1962, Nature.

[73]  U. Candolin Sexual Selection and Sexual Conflict , 2019, Encyclopedia of Ecology.

[74]  F. Mery,et al.  Sexual harassment induces a temporary fitness cost but does not constrain the acquisition of environmental information in fruit flies , 2016, Biology Letters.

[75]  Daniel E. Bath Characterization of the neuronal mechanisms that mediate temporal control of the courtship behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster , 2014 .

[76]  M. Wolfner,et al.  Molecular social interactions: Drosophila melanogaster seminal fluid proteins as a case study. , 2009, Advances in genetics.

[77]  G. Arnqvist,et al.  beetles between population fitness and sexual dimorphism in seed Sexual conflict and the gender load : correlated evolution , 2009 .

[78]  H. Kokko,et al.  Sexy to die for? Sexual selection and the risk of extinction , 2003 .

[79]  W. Kennington,et al.  A simple method to achieve consistent larval density in bottle cultures. , 2001 .

[80]  L. Partridge,et al.  Non-mating costs of exposure to males in female Drosophila melanogaster , 1990 .

[81]  T. E. Moore,et al.  Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects , 1979 .

[82]  K. Connolly,et al.  Rejection Responses By Female Drosophila Melanogaster : Their Ontogeny, Causality and Effects Upon the Behaviour of the Courting Male , 1973 .

[83]  A. Manning,et al.  The Courtship of Drosophila Melanogaster , 1955 .