Changing ventilation rates in U.S. offices: Implications for health, work performance, energy, and associated economics

This paper provides quantitative estimates of benefits and costs of providing different amounts of outdoor air ventilation in U.S. offices. For four scenarios that modify ventilation rates, we estimated changes in sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms, work performance, short-term absence, and building energy consumption. The estimated annual economic benefits were $13 billion from increasing minimum ventilation rates (VRs) from 8 to 10 L/s per person, $38 billion from increasing minimum VRs from 8 to 15 L/s per person, and $33 billion from increasing VRs by adding outdoor air economizers for the 50% of the office floor area that currently lacks economizers. The estimated $0.04 billion in annual energy-related benefits of decreasing minimum VRs from 8 to 6.5 L/s per person are very small compared to the projected annual costs of $12 billion. Benefits of increasing minimum VRs far exceeded energy costs while adding economizers yielded health, performance, and absence benefits with energy savings.

[1]  Andrew K. Persily,et al.  Analysis of Ventilation Data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Building Assessment Survey and Evaluation (BASE) Study , 2004 .

[2]  P V Nielsen,et al.  Role of ventilation in airborne transmission of infectious agents in the built environment - a multidisciplinary systematic review. , 2007, Indoor air.

[3]  Paul Torcellini,et al.  Assessment of the Energy Impacts of Outside Air in the Commercial Sector , 2009 .

[4]  M J Mendell,et al.  Quantitative relationship of sick building syndrome symptoms with ventilation rates. , 2009, Indoor air.

[5]  W J Fisk,et al.  Benefits and costs of improved IEQ in U.S. offices. , 2011, Indoor air.

[6]  W. Fisk HEALTH AND PRODUCTIVITY GAINS FROM BETTER INDOOR ENVIRONMENTS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH BUILDING ENERGY EFFICIENCY , 2000 .

[7]  J. E. Janssen Working with ANSI/ASHRAE standard 62-1989 , 1992 .

[8]  W. Fisk,et al.  Association of ventilation rates and CO2 concentrations with health and other responses in commercial and institutional buildings. , 1999, Indoor air.

[9]  R. Judkoff,et al.  Methodology for Modeling Building Energy Performance across the Commercial Sector , 2008 .

[10]  Hal Levin,et al.  Improving the health of workers in indoor environments: priority research needs for a national occupational research agenda. , 2002, American journal of public health.

[11]  Bing Liu,et al.  U.S. Department of Energy Commercial Reference Building Models of the National Building Stock , 2011 .

[12]  J D Spengler,et al.  Evaluating building-related symptoms using the US EPA BASE study results. , 2008, Indoor air.

[13]  D K Milton,et al.  Risk of sick leave associated with outdoor air supply rate, humidification, and occupant complaints. , 2000, Indoor air.

[14]  J. E. Janssen,et al.  Ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality , 1989 .

[15]  O Seppänen,et al.  Ventilation and performance in office work. , 2006, Indoor air.

[16]  D Faulkner,et al.  Associations between classroom CO2 concentrations and student attendance in Washington and Idaho. , 2004, Indoor air.