Using Morphological-Linear Neural Network for Upper Limb Movement Intention Recognition from EEG Signals

This study aims to compare classical and Morphological-Linear Neural Network (MLNN) algorithms for the intention recognition to perform different movements from electroencephalographic (EEG) signals. Three classification models were implemented and assessed to decode EEG motor imagery signals: (i) Morphological-Linear Neural Network (MLNN) (ii) Support Vector Machine (SVM) and (iii) Multilayer perceptron (MLP). Real EEG signals recorded during robot-assisted rehabilitation therapy were used to evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithms in the classification of three classes (relax, movement intention A Int A and movement intention B Int B) using multi-CSP based features extracted from EEG signals. The results of a ten-fold cross validation show similar results in terms of classification accuracy for the SVM and MLNN models. However, the number of parameters used in each model varies considerably (the MLNN model use less parameters than the SVM). This study indicates potential application of MLNNs for decoding movement intentions and its use to develop more natural and intuitive robot assisted neurorehabilitation therapies.

[1]  James A. Anderson,et al.  Neurocomputing: Foundations of Research , 1988 .

[2]  Bernhard E. Boser,et al.  A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers , 1992, COLT '92.

[3]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[4]  Juan Humberto Sossa Azuela,et al.  Morphological-Linear Neural Network , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE).

[5]  Carlo Menon,et al.  EEG Classification of Different Imaginary Movements within the Same Limb , 2015, PloS one.

[6]  J. Pereira,et al.  EEG patterns of self-paced movement imaginations towards externally-cued and internally-selected targets , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[7]  Ander Ramos-Murguialday,et al.  Classification of different reaching movements from the same limb using EEG , 2017, Journal of neural engineering.

[8]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Random Search for Hyper-Parameter Optimization , 2012, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[9]  C. V. D. Malsburg,et al.  Frank Rosenblatt: Principles of Neurodynamics: Perceptrons and the Theory of Brain Mechanisms , 1986 .

[10]  Omar Aguilar-Leal,et al.  Platform for the study of virtual task-oriented motion and its evaluation by EEG and EMG biopotentials , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[11]  Gernot R Müller-Putz,et al.  Upper limb movements can be decoded from the time-domain of low-frequency EEG , 2017, PloS one.

[12]  James M. Reecy,et al.  Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis Provides Novel Insights into Myostatin Regulation at Three Different Mouse Developmental Timepoints , 2015, PloS one.

[13]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Boosting bit rates in noninvasive EEG single-trial classifications by feature combination and multiclass paradigms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Russ Greiner,et al.  Assessment of feature selection and classification methods for recognizing motor imagery tasks from electroencephalographic signals , 2016, Artif. Intell. Res..