What Is the Best Femoral Fixation of Hamstring Autografts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?: A Meta-analysis

BackgroundSeveral methods are available for fixing the femoral side of a hamstring autograft in ACL reconstruction and the best method is unclear. Biomechanical studies have shown varying results with regard to fixation failure.Questions/purposesWe asked whether there were any differences with regard to graft failures and functional outcome measures with differing methods of femoral fixation of hamstring autografts in ACL reconstruction.MethodsWe systematically reviewed the literature using PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Controlled Trial Register databases with regard to interference screw fixation (aperture fixation) versus noninterference screw fixation (fixation away from the joint line). A meta-analysis was performed of those studies reporting on surgical failures and postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee score. Eight studies met our inclusion criteria of Level I or II evidence.ResultsUse of interference screws for femoral fixation resulted in a trend toward decreased risk of surgical failure (relative risk = 0.57; confidence interval, 0.1678–1.0918). When only Level I trials were evaluated, the same trend was noted toward a decreased risk of surgical failures using femoral interference screws (relative risk = 0.52; confidence interval, 0.1794–1.3122). There was no difference in postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee score with Level I and II studies (relative risk = 0.9940; confidence interval, 0.6230–1.5860) or only Level I studies (relative risk = 1.0380; confidence interval, 0.6381–1.6886).ConclusionsThe literature suggests a trend toward decreased surgical failures with femoral fixation at the joint line with an interference screw. However, there is no difference when postoperative functional outcomes are compared. Future studies are needed with standardized fixation methods and outcomes assessment to determine the importance of femoral fixation.

[1]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[2]  Arsi Harilainen,et al.  Cross-pin femoral fixation versus metal interference screw fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons: results of a controlled prospective randomized study with 2-year follow-up. , 2005, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[3]  Mika Vihavainen,et al.  The Fixation Strength of Six Hamstring Tendon Graft Fixation Devices in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Part II: Tibial Site * , 2003, The American journal of sports medicine.

[4]  B. J. Larson,et al.  Cross-pin femoral fixation: a new technique for hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the knee. , 1998, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[5]  P. Chambat,et al.  Graft fixation in cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2001, The American journal of sports medicine.

[6]  J. D. Withrow,et al.  Hamstring graft motion in the femoral bone tunnel when using titanium button/ polyester tape fixation , 1999, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[7]  Christopher D. Harner,et al.  Tunnel expansion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon autografts , 1997, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[8]  L. Paulos,et al.  Bioabsorbable interference screws for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 1999, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[9]  Rainer Siebold,et al.  Prospective randomized comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2008, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[10]  R. Siebold,et al.  A prospective evaluation of tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings: extracortical versus anatomical fixation , 2002, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[11]  A. Ferretti,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of different anterior cruciate ligament fixation techniques for hamstring graft , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[12]  V. Denaro,et al.  No difference in clinical results between femoral transfixation and bio-interference screw fixation in hamstring tendon ACL reconstruction. A preliminary study. , 2008, The Knee.

[13]  P. Faunø,et al.  Tunnel widening after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is influenced by the type of graft fixation used: a prospective randomized study. , 2005, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[14]  H. Lill,et al.  Prospective randomized clinical comparison of femoral transfixation versus bioscrew fixation in hamstring tendon ACL reconstruction—a preliminary report , 2006, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[15]  J. Seifert,et al.  Resorbable screws versus pins for optimal transplant fixation (SPOT) in anterior cruciate ligament replacement with autologous hamstring grafts: rationale and design of a randomized, controlled, patient and investigator blinded trial [ISRCTN17384369] , 2005, BMC surgery.

[16]  J. Sandelin,et al.  A Prospective Comparison of 3 Hamstring ACL Fixation Devices—Rigidfix, BioScrew, and Intrafix—Randomized into 4 Groups with 2 Years of Follow-Up , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.

[17]  William N Levine,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissue Femoral Fixation Devices for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2004, The American journal of sports medicine.

[18]  G. Altman,et al.  The effect of interference screw diameter on fixation of soft-tissue grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2010, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[19]  Chih-Hwa Chen Graft healing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , 2009, Sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation, therapy & technology : SMARTT.

[20]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Prediction of patient-reported outcome after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2009, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[21]  A. Weiler,et al.  Biomechanical comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: The impact of fixation level and fixation method under cyclic loading. , 2002, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[22]  Braden C. Fleming,et al.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Replacement: Comparison of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Grafts with Two-Strand Hamstring Grafts A Prospective, Randomized Study , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  E. Alentorn-Geli,et al.  The transtibial versus the anteromedial portal technique in the arthroscopic bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , 2010, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[24]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of bioabsorbable interference screw and endobutton-post fixation. , 2004, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[25]  S. Rodeo,et al.  Tendon Healing in a Bone Tunnel Differs at the Tunnel Entrance versus the Tunnel Exit , 2006, The American journal of sports medicine.

[26]  Giuseppe Milano,et al.  Comparison between different femoral fixation devices for ACL reconstruction with doubled hamstring tendon graft: a biomechanical analysis. , 2006, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[27]  Jacques Menetrey,et al.  Current Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2000, The American journal of sports medicine.

[28]  O. Hapa,et al.  ACL Fixation Devices , 2009, Sports medicine and arthroscopy review.

[29]  C. Harner,et al.  Tunnel expansion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous hamstrings: a comparison of the medial portal and transtibial techniques. , 2006, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.