Enriching Ontologies with Linguistic Content: an Evaluation Framework

In this paper, we present a framework for representing and evaluating integrations between ontological and linguistic resources, which originates and improves previous research reported in (Pazienza & Stellato, 2006b; Pazienza, Sguera, & Stellato, 2007) and articulates into two results: first, a set of coordinated RDF vocabularies providing descriptors for representing linguistic resources and their software counterparts, as well as offering metadata for describing the linguistic enrichment of ontologies, both on quantitative and qualitative grounds. The second result is a software library for evaluating the quality of automatic linguistic enrichment tools. The Linguistic Watermark suite of RDF vocabularies, in the newly presented form, provides to our framework shared vocabularies for addressing the knowledge about heterogeneous linguistic resources, for accessing and managing their content on a common basis through dedicated software components and for representing the integration of this content inside ontologies. This last part constitutes the bridge towards our novel evaluation framework, which produces quality reports based on assessed evaluation metrics taken from the Information Retrieval tradition (Van Rijsbergen, 1975) and adapted to this task. We hope that this framework could provide a stable and reusable tool for evaluating the quality of competing algorithmic solutions for linguistic enrichment of ontologies.

[1]  Kadri Vider,et al.  Estonian Wordnet and Lexicography , 2005 .

[2]  Christiane Fellbaum,et al.  Language to Logic Translation with PhraseBank , 2004 .

[3]  Nancy Ide,et al.  Sense Discrimination with Parallel Corpora , 2002, SENSEVAL.

[4]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Sweetening WORDNET with DOLCE , 2003, AI Mag..

[5]  Philip Resnik,et al.  A Perspective on Word Sense Disambiguation Methods and Their Evaluation , 2002 .

[6]  Paul Buitelaar,et al.  LingInfo: Design and Applications of a Model for the Integration of Linguistic Information in Ontologies , 2006 .

[7]  Horacio Rodríguez,et al.  Using WordNet for Building WordNets , 1998, WordNet@ACL/COLING.

[8]  A. Cappelli,et al.  Ontological Knowledge and Language in Modelling Classical Architectonic Structures , 2004 .

[9]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Sweetening Ontologies with DOLCE , 2002, EKAW.

[10]  Jörg Tiedemann Recycling Translations : Extraction of Lexical Data from Parallel Corpora and their Application in Natural Language Processing , 2003 .

[11]  Chu-Ren Huang Sinica BOW: integrating bilingual WordNet and SUMO ontology , 2003, International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Engineering, 2003. Proceedings. 2003.

[12]  Piek Vossen,et al.  EuroWordNet: A multilingual database with lexical semantic networks , 1998, Springer Netherlands.

[13]  Kaarel Kaljurand,et al.  ATTEMPTO CONTROLLED ENGLISH AS A SEMANTIC WEB LANGUAGE , 2007 .

[14]  Mona T. Diab Feasibility of Bootstrapping an Arabic WordNet Leveraging Parallel Corpora and an English WordNet , 2022 .

[15]  Roberto Basili,et al.  Integrating ontological and linguistic knowledge for conceptual information extraction , 2003, Proceedings IEEE/WIC International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI 2003).

[16]  Beth Levin,et al.  English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation , 1993 .

[17]  Tullio De Mauro,et al.  Introduzione alla semantica , 1965 .

[18]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  DL-Lite: Practical Reasoning for Rich Dls , 2004, Description Logics.

[19]  Piek Vossen,et al.  EUROWORDNET: A MULTILINGUAL DATABASE OF AUTONOMOUS AND LANGUAGE-SPECIFIC WORDNETS CONNECTED VIA AN INTER-LINGUALINDEX , 2004, International Journal of Lexicography.

[20]  Kadri Vider,et al.  Concerning the Difference Between a Conception and its Application in the Case of the Estonian WordNet , 2004 .

[21]  Laura Monceaux,et al.  French EuroWordNet Lexical Database Improvements , 2007, CICLing.

[22]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  The OntoWordNet Project: Extension and Axiomatization of Conceptual Relations in WordNet , 2003, OTM.

[23]  Claudia Soria,et al.  Lexical Markup Framework (LMF) for NLP Multilingual Resources , 2006 .

[24]  Martha Palmer,et al.  Class-Based Construction of a Verb Lexicon , 2000, AAAI/IAAI.

[25]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  Tractable Reasoning and Efficient Query Answering in Description Logics: The DL-Lite Family , 2007, Journal of Automated Reasoning.

[26]  Kaarel Kaljurand,et al.  Automatic WSD: Does it Make Sense of Estonian? , 2001, SENSEVAL@ACL.

[27]  Jérôme Euzenat,et al.  Semantic Precision and Recall for Ontology Alignment Evaluation , 2007, IJCAI.

[28]  Maria Ruiz-Casado,et al.  Automatic Extraction of Semantic Relationships for WordNet by Means of Pattern Learning from Wikipedia , 2005, NLDB.

[29]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications , 2003, Description Logic Handbook.

[30]  Jörg Tiedemann,et al.  Finding Synonyms Using Automatic Word Alignment and Measures of Distributional Similarity , 2006, ACL.

[31]  Adam Pease,et al.  Linking Lixicons and Ontologies: Mapping WordNet to the Suggested Upper Merged Ontology , 2003, IKE.

[32]  Adam Pease,et al.  Towards a standard upper ontology , 2001, FOIS.

[33]  F. D. Saussure Cours de linguistique générale , 1924 .