Stalis: A Computational Method for Template‐Based Ab Initio Ligand Design

Proteins interact with small molecules through specific molecular recognition, which is central to essential biological functions in living systems. Therefore, understanding such interactions is crucial for basic sciences and drug discovery. Here, we present Structure template‐based ab initio ligand design solution (Stalis), a knowledge‐based approach that uses structure templates from the Protein Data Bank libraries of whole ligands and their fragments and generates a set of molecules (virtual ligands) whose structures represent the pocket shape and chemical features of a given target binding site. Our benchmark performance evaluation shows that ligand structure‐based virtual screening using virtual ligands from Stalis outperforms a receptor structure‐based virtual screening using AutoDock Vina, demonstrating reliable overall screening performance applicable to computational high‐throughput screening. However, virtual ligands from Stalis are worse in recognizing active compounds at the small fraction of a rank‐ordered list of screened library compounds than crystal ligands, due to the low resolution of the virtual ligand structures. In conclusion, Stalis can facilitate drug discovery research by designing virtual ligands that can be used for fast ligand structure‐based virtual screening. Moreover, Stalis provides actual three‐dimensional ligand structures that likely bind to a target protein, enabling to gain structural insight into potential ligands. Stalis can be an efficient computational platform for high‐throughput ligand design for fundamental biological study and drug discovery research at the proteomic level. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Nuclear hormone receptor targeted virtual screening. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[2]  Hui Sun Lee,et al.  Improving Virtual Screening Performance against Conformational Variations of Receptors by Shape Matching with Ligand Binding Pocket , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[3]  J. Tuszynski,et al.  Software for molecular docking: a review , 2017, Biophysical Reviews.

[4]  Olivier Michielin,et al.  SwissADME: a free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Thierry Hanser,et al.  A New Algorithm for Exhaustive Ring Perception in a Molecular Graph , 1996, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[6]  Hongyi Zhou,et al.  FINDSITEcomb2.0: A New Approach for Virtual Ligand Screening of Proteins and Virtual Target Screening of Biomolecules , 2018, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[7]  Michael M. Mysinger,et al.  Directory of Useful Decoys, Enhanced (DUD-E): Better Ligands and Decoys for Better Benchmarking , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[8]  J. A. Grant,et al.  A fast method of molecular shape comparison: A simple application of a Gaussian description of molecular shape , 1996, J. Comput. Chem..

[9]  J. Scannell,et al.  Diagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical R&D efficiency , 2012, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[10]  Peter Willett,et al.  Similarity-based virtual screening using 2D fingerprints. , 2006, Drug discovery today.

[11]  Michal Brylinski,et al.  Comparative assessment of strategies to identify similar ligand-binding pockets in proteins , 2018, BMC Bioinformatics.

[12]  P Willett,et al.  Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  William J. Allen,et al.  DOCK 6: Impact of new features and current docking performance , 2015, J. Comput. Chem..

[14]  Lorenz M Mayr,et al.  Novel trends in high-throughput screening. , 2009, Current opinion in pharmacology.

[15]  Hui Sun Lee,et al.  Ligand Binding Site Detection by Local Structure Alignment and Its Performance Complementarity , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[16]  C. Ottmann,et al.  Modulators of protein-protein interactions. , 2014, Chemical reviews.

[17]  J. Bajorath,et al.  Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[18]  Jeffrey Skolnick,et al.  PoLi: A Virtual Screening Pipeline Based on Template Pocket and Ligand Similarity , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[19]  A. Saghatelian,et al.  A global metabolite profiling approach to identify protein-metabolite interactions. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[20]  Hui Sun Lee,et al.  Identification of Ligand Templates using Local Structure Alignment for Structure-Based Drug Design , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[21]  D. Scott,et al.  Fragment-based approaches in drug discovery and chemical biology. , 2012, Biochemistry.

[22]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  Chris Morley,et al.  Open Babel: An open chemical toolbox , 2011, J. Cheminformatics.

[24]  Ksenia Oguievetskaia,et al.  Computational Fragment-Based Approach at PDB Scale by Protein Local Similarity , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[25]  Arthur J. Olson,et al.  AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[26]  Christopher W. Murray,et al.  The sensitivity of the results of molecular docking to induced fit effects: Application to thrombin, thermolysin and neuraminidase , 1999, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[27]  Wonpil Im,et al.  G‐LoSA: An efficient computational tool for local structure‐centric biological studies and drug design , 2016, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[28]  Ajay N. Jain Surflex: fully automatic flexible molecular docking using a molecular similarity-based search engine. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[29]  U. Sauer,et al.  Regulation and control of metabolic fluxes in microbes. , 2011, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[30]  J. Irwin,et al.  Benchmarking sets for molecular docking. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[31]  Yang Zhang,et al.  BSP‐SLIM: A blind low‐resolution ligand‐protein docking approach using predicted protein structures , 2012, Proteins.

[32]  J. Skolnick,et al.  A threading-based method (FINDSITE) for ligand-binding site prediction and functional annotation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  J. Changeux,et al.  Allosteric Modulation as a Unifying Mechanism for Receptor Function and Regulation , 2016, Cell.

[34]  Wannian Zhang,et al.  Fragment Informatics and Computational Fragment‐Based Drug Design: An Overview and Update , 2013, Medicinal research reviews.

[35]  J. Skolnick,et al.  TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[36]  Matthew P. Repasky,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.