Managing the Risks of Proactivity: A Multilevel Study of Initiative and Performance in the Middle Management Context

Drawing on theories of behavioral decision making and situational strength, we developed and tested a multilevel model that explains how the performance outcomes of personal initiative tendency depend on the extent of alignment between organizational control mechanisms and proactive individuals' risk propensities. Results from a sample of 383 middle managers operating in 34 business units of a large multinational corporation indicated that risk propensity weakens the positive relationship between personal initiative tendency and job performance. This negative moderating effect was further amplified when middle managers receive high job autonomy but was attenuated in business units with a strong performance management context. We discuss the implications of these findings for research on proactivity, risk taking, and organizational control.

[1]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. , 1987 .

[2]  Timothy B. Palmer,et al.  Decoupling risk taking from income stream uncertainty: a holistic model of risk , 1999 .

[3]  Robert A. Burgelman.  A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in the Diversified Major Firm , 1983 .

[4]  Ethan R. Burris.  The Risks and Rewards of Speaking Up: Managerial Responses to Employee Voice , 2012 .

[5]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Business Unit Strategy, Managerial Characteristics, and Business Unit Effectiveness at Strategy Implementation , 1984 .

[6]  J. Crant,et al.  Proactive Behavior in Organizations , 2000 .

[7]  D. Campbell.  The proactive employee: Managing workplace initiative , 2000 .

[8]  J. Michael Crant,et al.  The Proactive Personality Scale and objective job performance among real estate agents. , 1995 .

[9]  Margaret Jover.  Risk-taking propensity of successful and usuccessful Hispanic female entrepreneurs , 1992 .

[10]  Nick Turner,et al.  Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  Lola L. Lopes,et al.  [Advances in Experimental Social Psychology] Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Volume 20 Volume 20 || Between Hope and Fear: The Psychology of Risk , 1987 .

[12]  Sandeep Mishra,et al.  Individual differences in risk-propensity: Associations between personality and behavioral measures of risk , 2011 .

[13]  S. Floyd,et al.  The Middle Management Perspective on Strategy Process: Contributions, Synthesis, and Future Research , 2008 .

[14]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment. , 1996 .

[15]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[16]  Deanne N Den Hartog,et al.  When does transformational leadership enhance employee proactive behavior? The role of autonomy and role breadth self-efficacy. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  B. M. Staw.  The Escalation of Commitment To a Course of Action , 1981 .

[18]  Berrin Erdogan,et al.  Enhancing career benefits of employee proactive personality: The role of fit with jobs and organizations. , 2005 .

[19]  David Marginson,et al.  Management control systems and their effects on strategy formation at middle‐management levels: evidence from a U.K. organization , 2002 .

[20]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  Answers to 20 Questions About Interrater Reliability and Interrater Agreement , 2008 .

[21]  William G. Ouchi,et al.  Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans. , 1980 .

[22]  S. Zahra,et al.  Middle managers' perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: assessing a measurement scale , 2002 .

[23]  J. Sinacore.  Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions , 1993 .

[24]  Jeffery A. Thompson,et al.  Proactive personality and job performance: a social capital perspective. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[25]  M. Frese,et al.  Conservatives' Approach to Work: Less Prepared for Future Work Demands?1 , 2000 .

[26]  R. Baron.  The cognitive perspective: a valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship's basic “why” questions , 2004 .

[27]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Strategizing Throughout the Organization: Managing Role Conflict in Strategic Renewal , 2000 .

[28]  S. Parker,et al.  A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts , 2007 .

[29]  T. S. Bateman,et al.  The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates , 1993 .

[30]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, a n d M e t h o d s i n Organizations Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2022 .

[31]  E. Higgins,et al.  Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations : Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making , 1997 .

[32]  R. Kanter.  The middle manager as innovator. , 1982, Harvard business review.

[33]  Kenneth R. MacCrimmon,et al.  Characteristics of risk taking executives , 1990 .

[34]  William H. Glick,et al.  Conceptualizing and Measuring Organizational and Psychological Climate: Pitfalls in Multilevel Research , 1985 .

[35]  Adam M. Grant,et al.  GETTING CREDIT FOR PROACTIVE BEHAVIOR:SUPERVISOR REACTIONS DEPEND ON WHAT YOU VALUE AND HOW YOU FEEL , 2009 .

[36]  Katsu Shimizu,et al.  Risks of Corporate Entrepreneurship: Autonomy and Agency Issues , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[37]  L. Gómez-Mejia,et al.  A Behavioral Agency Model of Managerial Risk Taking , 1998 .

[38]  D. Hofmann,et al.  The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. , 2000 .

[39]  Adam M. Grant,et al.  The performance implications of ambivalent initiative: The interplay of autonomous and controlled motivations , 2011 .

[40]  R. Baron,et al.  Entrepreneurs' Optimism And New Venture Performance: A Social Cognitive Perspective , 2009 .

[41]  David B. Balkin,et al.  Effectiveness of Individual and Aggregate Compensation Strategies , 1989 .

[42]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Regulatory focus theory and the entrepreneurial process , 2004 .

[43]  Connie R. Wanberg,et al.  Job search and employment: a personality-motivational analysis and meta-analytic review. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[44]  Michael Frese,et al.  The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples , 1997 .

[45]  Adam M. Grant,et al.  When in doubt, seize the day? Security values, prosocial values, and proactivity under ambiguity. , 2013, The Journal of applied psychology.

[46]  Laura B. Cardinal.  Technological Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry: The Use of Organizational Control in Managing Research and Development , 2001 .

[47]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[48]  D. T.K..  STRATEGIC RISK BEHAVIOUR AND ITS TEMPORALITIES: BETWEEN RISK PROPENSITY AND DECISION CONTEXT , 2001 .

[49]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. , 1993 .

[50]  Richard,et al.  Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. , 1976 .

[51]  T. Elfring,et al.  Achieving strategic renewal: the multi-level influences of top and middle managers’ boundary-spanning , 2015 .

[52]  R. Dalal,et al.  A Review and Synthesis of Situational Strength in the Organizational Sciences , 2010 .

[53]  R. Staelin,et al.  A Model of Perceived Risk and Intended Risk-handling Activity , 1994 .

[54]  G. Lumpkin,et al.  Entrepreneurial Orientation Theory and Research: Reflections on a Needed Construct , 2011 .

[55]  Maria L. Kraimer,et al.  Proactive personality and career success. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[56]  I. Vertinsky,et al.  Adjusting risky situations: A theoretical framework and empirical test , 1989 .

[57]  Amy L. Pablo,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Determinants of Risk Behavior , 1992 .

[58]  M. Frese,et al.  Construct Clean-Up in Proactivity Research: A Meta-Analysis on the Nomological Net of Work-Related Proactivity Concepts and their Incremental Validities , 2013 .

[59]  Douglas D. Moesel,et al.  The Market for Corporate Control and Firm Innovation , 1996 .

[60]  N. Rothbard,et al.  Out on a limb: The role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues. , 1998 .

[61]  Bernard C. Y. Tan,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Study on Escalation of Commitment Behavior in Software Projects , 2000, MIS Q..

[62]  Ning Li,et al.  The role of proactive personality in job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: a relational perspective. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[63]  M. Frese,et al.  4. Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century , 2001 .

[64]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Linking organizational context and managerial action: The dimensions of quality of management , 2007 .

[65]  S. Parker,et al.  Taking Stock: Integrating and Differentiating Multiple Proactive Behaviors , 2010 .

[66]  S. Sitkin,et al.  Determinants of Risky Decision-Making Behavior: A Test of the Mediating Role of Risk Perceptions and Propensity , 1995 .

[67]  M. Frese,et al.  Making Things Happen : Reciprocal Relationships between Work Characteristics and Personal Initiative ( PI ) in a Four-Wave Longitudinal Structural Equation Model , 2008 .

[68]  Stefan Wally,et al.  Personal and Structural Determinants of the Pace of Strategic Decision Making , 1994 .

[69]  D. Chan.  Interactive effects of situational judgment effectiveness and proactive personality on work perceptions and work outcomes. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.