Geothermal Heat Pumps in K-12 Schools -- A Case Study of the Lincoln, Nebraska, Schools

Geothermal heat pumps (GHPs) have been shown to have a number of benefits over other technologies used to heat and cool buildings and provide hot water, combining high levels of occupant comfort with low operating and maintenance costs. Public facilities represent an increasingly important market for GHPs, and schools are a particularly good application, given the large land area that normally surrounds them. Nevertheless, some barriers remain to the increased use of GHPs in institutional and commercial applications. First, because GHPs are perceived as having higher installation costs than other space conditioning technologies, they are sometimes not considered as an option in feasibility studies. When they are considered, it can be difficult to compile the information required to compare them with other technologies. For example, a life cycle cost analysis requires estimates of installation costs and annually recurring energy and maintenance costs. But most cost estimators are unfamiliar with GHP technology, and no published GHP construction cost estimating guide is available. For this reason, estimates of installed costs tend to be very conservative, furthering the perception that GHPs are more costly than other technologies. Because GHP systems are not widely represented in the various softwares used by engineers to predict building energy use, it is also difficult to estimate the annual energy use of a building having GHP systems. Very little published data is available on expected maintenance costs either. Because of this lack of information, developing an accurate estimate of the life cycle cost of a GHP system requires experience and expertise that are not available in all institutions or in all areas of the country. In 1998, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) entered into an agreement with the Lincoln, Nebraska, Public School District and Lincoln Electric Service, the local electric utility in the Lincoln area, to study four new, identical elementary schools built in the district that are served by GHPs. ORNL was provided with complete as-built construction plans for the schools and associated equipment, access to original design calculations and cost estimates, extensive equipment operating data [both from the buildings' energy management systems (EMSs) and from utility meters], and access to the school district's complete maintenance record database, not only for the four GHP schools, but for the other schools in the district using conventional space conditioning equipment. Using this information, we were able to reproduce the process used by the Lincoln school district and the consulting engineering firm to select GHPs over other options to provide space conditioning for the four schools. The objective was to determine whether this decision was the correct one, or whether some other technology would have been more cost-effective. An additional objective was to identify all of the factors that make it difficult for building owners and their engineers to consider GHPs in their projects so that ongoing programs can remove these impediments over time.

[1]  Martin,et al.  Comparing maintenance costs of geothermal heat pump systems with other HVAC systems in Lincoln public schools: Repair, service, and corrective actions , 1999 .

[2]  Means Means mechanical cost data , 1983 .

[3]  W. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in Fortran: The Art of Scientific Computing.@@@Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing. , 1994 .

[4]  Means Means facilities maintenance & repair cost data : maintenance & repair : preventive & general maintenance : facilities audits , 1998 .

[5]  Stephen R. Petersen,et al.  Life-cycle costing manual for the Federal Energy Management Program , 1996 .

[6]  Jeff W. Thornton,et al.  A new comparison of vertical ground heat exchanger design methods for residential applications , 1999 .

[7]  Daniel Pahud,et al.  Duct Ground Heat Storage Model. Lund - DST. TRNSYS Version January 1996 , 1996 .

[8]  Jeff W. Thornton,et al.  Comparison of practical vertical ground heat exchanger sizing methods to a Fort Polk data/model benchmark , 1997 .

[9]  H. A. McLain,et al.  A Preliminary Evaluation of the DOE-2.1E Ground Vertical Well Model Using Maxey School Measured Data , 1999 .

[10]  T. Alereza,et al.  Analysis of survey data on HVAC maintenance costs , 1986 .

[11]  D. Cane,et al.  Operating experiences with commercial ground-source heat pumps. Part 2 , 1996 .

[12]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C. The art of scientific computing , 1987 .

[13]  Smith,et al.  Borehole grouting: Field studies and thermal performance testing , 1999 .

[14]  D. Cane,et al.  Maintenance and Service Costs of Commercial Building Ground-Source Heat Pump Systems , 1998 .

[15]  Martin,et al.  Comparing maintenance costs of geothermal heat pump systems with other HVAC systems: Preventive maintenance actions and total maintenance costs , 2000 .

[16]  P. J. Hughes,et al.  The evaluation of a 4000-home geothermal heat pump retrofit at Fort Polk, Louisiana: Final Report , 1998 .

[17]  John A Shonder,et al.  Estimated maintenance cost savings from a geothermal heat pump energy savings performance contract at Fort Polk, Louisiana , 1997 .

[18]  J. J. Hirsch,et al.  DOE-2 supplement: Version 2.1E , 1993 .

[19]  J. Beck,et al.  Field Test of a New Method for Determining Soil Formation Thermal Conductivity and Borehole Resistance , 2000 .