A model-based system for the classification and analysis of materials

To build model-based systems capable of emulating the scientist's or engineer's way of reasoning about a given physical domain requires methods for automating the formulation or selection of a model which adequately captures the knowledge needed for solving a specific problem. To find and exploit such models requires the use and integration of different kinds of knowledge, formalisms and methods. This paper describes a system which aims at reasoning automatically about visco-elastic materials from a mechanical point of view. It integrates both domain-specific and domain-independent knowledge in order to classify and analyse the mechanical behaviour of materials. The classification task is based on qualitative knowledge, whereas the analysis of a material is performed at a quantitative level and is based on numerical simulation. The key ideas of the work are to automatically generate a library of models of ideal materials and their corresponding qualitative responses to standard experiments; to classify an actual material by selecting from within the library a class of models whose simulated qualitative behaviours towards standard loads match the observed behaviours; to identify a quantitative model of the material, and then to analyse the material by simulating its behaviour on any load. Each model in the library is automatically generated in two different forms; at the lowest level, as a symbolic description and, at a mathematical level, as an ordinary differential equation. This paper mainly concentrates on the methods and algorithms of model generation and qualitative simulation. >

[1]  Brian Falkenhainer,et al.  Compositional Modeling: Finding the Right Model for the Job , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[2]  Brian C. Williams,et al.  Diagnosing Multiple Faults , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[3]  J. Ferry Viscoelastic properties of polymers , 1961 .

[4]  R. G. C. Arridge,et al.  Mechanics of polymers , 1975 .

[5]  Liliana Ironi,et al.  An Algorithm for the Automated Generation of Rheological Models , 1991 .

[6]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Mathematical methods for artificial intelligence and autonomous systems , 1988 .

[7]  Brian Falkenhainer,et al.  Self-Explanatory Simulations: An Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative Knowledge , 1990, AAAI.

[8]  Johan de Kleer,et al.  Readings in qualitative reasoning about physical systems , 1990 .

[9]  Kenneth Man-kam Yip,et al.  Understanding Complex Dynamics by Visual and Symbolic Reasoning , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[10]  Sanjaya Addanki,et al.  Graphs of Models , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[11]  Dennis DeCoste,et al.  Dynamic Across-Time Measurement Interpretation , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[12]  J. Chaboche,et al.  Mechanics of Solid Materials , 1990 .

[13]  D. Bobrow Qualitative Reasoning about Physical Systems , 1985 .

[14]  Qiang Shen,et al.  Combining qualitative simulation and fuzzy sets , 1993 .

[15]  Randall Davis,et al.  Diagnostic Reasoning Based on Structure and Behavior , 1984, Artif. Intell..

[16]  B. W. Barry,et al.  Rheological properties of white soft paraffin , 1971 .

[17]  Brian C. Williams,et al.  A Theory of Interactions: Unifying Qualitative and Quantitative Algebraic Reasoning , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[18]  Elisha Sacks,et al.  Automatic Qualitative Analysis of Dynamic Systems Using Piecewise Linear Approximations , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[19]  Benjamin J. Kaipers,et al.  Qualitative Simulation , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[20]  S. Flügge,et al.  Encyclopedia of physics , 1962 .