Determination of Vibration Picking Parameters of Camellia Oleifera Fruit Based on Acceleration and Strain Response of Branches

This study examines the means of reducing the damage to the branches of Camellia oleifera in the process of vibration picking and solving the problems of low equipment-development efficiency and slow product renewal caused by using traditional test methods to determine vibration picking parameters. In this study, the optimal vibration parameters were determined by using the self-response (branch acceleration and strain) law of the Camellia oleifera tree, and finite element analysis and experiments are used to solve this problem. The 3D model of Camellia oleifera was built by Solidworks. The natural frequencies of Camellia oleifera were analyzed by modal analysis, the vibration frequency and amplitude were determined by harmonic response analysis, and transient analysis was used to compare with the test results. The results show that the optimal vibration frequency range of Camellia oleifera is 4~10 Hz, and the average correlation coefficient between the maximum synthetic acceleration and the simulated value is 0.85, which shows that the model can reliably predict the vibration response. At the same time, the best vibration parameters were determined to be 9 Hz, 60 mm and 10 s. Under these parameters, the abscission rate of the Camellia oleifera fruit was 90%, and the damage rate of the flower bud was 13%. The mechanized picking effect of Camellia oleifera fruit was good. This study can quickly determine the vibration picking parameters of Camellia oleifera fruit and effectively improve the development speed of vibration picking of Camellia oleifera fruit.

[1]  C. Ortiz,et al.  Citrus Fruit Movement Assessment Related to Fruit Damage during Harvesting with an Experimental Low-Frequency–High-Amplitude Device , 2022, Agronomy.

[2]  A. Torregrosa,et al.  Comparison of a Lightweight Experimental Shaker and an Orchard Tractor Mounted Trunk Shaker for Fresh Market Citrus Harvesting , 2021, Agriculture.

[3]  Te Ma,et al.  Modal Analysis and Experiment of a Lycium barbarum L. Shrub for Efficient Vibration Harvesting of Fruit , 2021, Agriculture.

[4]  Linyun Xu,et al.  The Potential Influence of Tree Crown Structure on the Ginkgo Harvest , 2021, Forests.

[5]  Chuanyu Wu,et al.  In-situ identification of shaking frequency for adaptive vibratory fruit harvesting , 2020, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[6]  A. Torregrosa,et al.  Mechanical Harvesting of Ornamental Citrus Trees in Valencia, Spain , 2019 .

[7]  Feng Jiang,et al.  Design and experiment of vibratory harvesting mechanism for Chinese hickory nuts based on orthogonal eccentric masses , 2019, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[8]  R. Ehsani,et al.  Design and evaluation of a two-section canopy shaker with variable frequency for mechanical harvesting of citrus , 2018 .

[9]  Reza Ehsani,et al.  Simulation study on the effects of tine-shaking frequency and penetrating depth on fruit detachment for citrus canopy-shaker harvesting , 2018, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[10]  G. Blanco-Roldán,et al.  Assessment of aerial and underground vibration transmission in mechanically trunk shaken olive trees , 2018 .

[11]  J. Williamson,et al.  Applying New Technologies to Transform Blueberry Harvesting , 2017 .

[12]  Chuanyu Wu,et al.  3D reconstruction of Chinese hickory tree for dynamics analysis , 2014 .

[13]  Jianfeng Zhou,et al.  Energy efficacy analysis of a mechanical shaker in sweet cherry harvesting , 2013 .

[14]  Reza Ehsani,et al.  Original paper: Study of force distribution in the citrus tree canopy during harvest using a continuous canopy shaker , 2011 .

[15]  Z. Lang,et al.  Frequency domain analysis of a dimensionless cubic nonlinear damping system subject to harmonic input , 2009 .

[16]  Chuanyu Wu,et al.  Design, Construction, and Evaluation of a Three-Dimensional Vibratory Harvester for Tree Fruit , 2020 .

[17]  Du Xiaoqiang,et al.  Analysis on Dynamics Characteristics of Vibratory Harvesting for Oil-tea Camellia Fruit , 2019, 2019 Boston, Massachusetts July 7- July 10, 2019.

[18]  Hamidreza Hoshyarmanesh,et al.  Numerical and experimental vibration analysis of olive tree for optimal mechanized harvesting efficiency and productivity , 2017, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[19]  Dongjian He,et al.  Simulation of vibration harvesting mechanism for sea buckthorn , 2016 .

[20]  Jianfeng Zhou,et al.  Evaluation of the Influence of Shaking Frequency and Duration in Mechanical Harvesting of Sweet Cherry , 2013 .

[21]  Dan Xiao,et al.  Simulation of Vibration Harvesting Mechanism for Wolfberry , 2011 .

[22]  Reza Ehsani,et al.  Simulation Study of Citrus Tree Canopy Motion During Harvesting Using a Canopy Shaker , 2010 .

[23]  Gregorio L. Blanco-Roldán,et al.  Effects of Trunk Shaker Duration and Repetitions on Removal Efficiency for the Harvesting of Oil Olives , 2009 .

[24]  Z. Láng,et al.  A One Degree of Freedom Damped Fruit Tree Model , 2008 .