Performance Analysis of Vehicular Device-to-Device Underlay Communication

The demand for vehicular mobile data services has increased exponentially, which necessitates alternative data pipes for vehicular users other than the cellular network and dedicated short-range communication. In this paper, we study the performance of underlaid vehicular device-to-device (V-D2D) communications, where the cellular uplink resources are reused by V-D2D communications, considering the characteristics of the vehicular network. Specifically, we model the considered urban area by a grid-like street layout, with nonhomogeneous distribution of vehicle density. We then propose to employ a joint power control and mode selection scheme for the V-D2D communications. In the scheme, we use channel inversion to control the transmit power, in order to determine transmit power based on path loss rather than instantaneous channel state information (CSI), and avoid severe interference due to excessively large transmit power; the transmission mode is selected based on the biased channel quality, where D2D mode is chosen when the biased D2D link quality is not worse than the cellular uplink quality. Under the proposed scheme, two performance metrics of V-D2D underlaid cellular networks, i.e., signal-to-interference-plus-noise outage probability and link/network throughput, are theoretically analyzed. Simulation results validate our analysis and show the impacts of design parameters on the network performance.

[1]  Erik G. Ström,et al.  D2D-based V2V communications with latency and reliability constraints , 2014, 2014 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[2]  Lassi Hentila,et al.  WINNER II Channel Models , 2009 .

[3]  B. Aazhang,et al.  Cellular networks with an overlaid device to device network , 2008, 2008 42nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[4]  Marco Fiore,et al.  Characterizing Pervasive Vehicular Access to the Cellular RAN Infrastructure: An Urban Case Study , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[5]  Sungsoo Park,et al.  Capacity Enhancement Using an Interference Limited Area for Device-to-Device Uplink Underlaying Cellular Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[6]  Nei Kato,et al.  Device-to-Device Communication in LTE-Advanced Networks: A Survey , 2015, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[7]  Kun Yang,et al.  A Random Road Network Model and Its Effects on Topological Characteristics of Mobile Delay-Tolerant Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[8]  Ahmed Helmy,et al.  Modeling and characterization of vehicular density at scale , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS).

[9]  Li Chen,et al.  Downlink resource allocation for Device-to-Device communication underlaying cellular networks , 2012, 2012 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications - (PIMRC).

[10]  Xuemin Shen,et al.  Bounds of Asymptotic Performance Limits of Social-Proximity Vehicular Networks , 2014, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[11]  Xiang Cheng,et al.  Efficiency Resource Allocation for Device-to-Device Underlay Communication Systems: A Reverse Iterative Combinatorial Auction Based Approach , 2012, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[12]  Nei Kato,et al.  On the Outage Probability of Device-to-Device-Communication-Enabled Multichannel Cellular Networks: An RSS-Threshold-Based Perspective , 2016, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[13]  Lei Zheng,et al.  A Geometrical-Based Throughput Bound Analysis for Device-to-Device Communications in Cellular Networks , 2014, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[14]  Christian Bonnet,et al.  VanetMobiSim: generating realistic mobility patterns for VANETs , 2006, VANET '06.

[15]  Xuemin Shen,et al.  Feel Bored? Join Verse! Engineering Vehicular Proximity Social Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[16]  Jörg Ott,et al.  Drive-thru Internet: IEEE 802.11b for "automobile" users , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[17]  Martin Haenggi,et al.  Stochastic Geometry for Modeling, Analysis, and Design of Multi-Tier and Cognitive Cellular Wireless Networks: A Survey , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[18]  Yusheng Ji,et al.  Power Control in D2D-Based Vehicular Communication Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[19]  Chung G. Kang,et al.  An effective interference alignment approach for device-to-device communication underlaying multi-cell interference network , 2012, 2012 International Conference on ICT Convergence (ICTC).

[20]  Xuemin Shen,et al.  Opportunistic Spectrum Access for CR-VANETs: A Game-Theoretic Approach , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[21]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Spectrum Sharing for Device-to-Device Communication in Cellular Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[22]  Weihua Zhuang,et al.  Wireless access technologies for vehicular network safety applications , 2016, IEEE Network.

[23]  Xiang Cheng,et al.  D2D for Intelligent Transportation Systems: A Feasibility Study , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[24]  Qing Wang,et al.  A Survey on Device-to-Device Communication in Cellular Networks , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[25]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  Analytical Modeling of Mode Selection and Power Control for Underlay D2D Communication in Cellular Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[26]  Olav Tirkkonen,et al.  Resource Sharing Optimization for Device-to-Device Communication Underlaying Cellular Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[27]  Xiaohui Liang,et al.  Pseudonym Changing at Social Spots: An Effective Strategy for Location Privacy in VANETs , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[28]  Xuemin Shen,et al.  Vehicles Meet Infrastructure: Toward Capacity–Cost Tradeoffs for Vehicular Access Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[29]  Lawrence Wai-Choong Wong,et al.  An Analysis Framework for Interuser Interference in IEEE 802.15.6 Body Sensor Networks: A Stochastic Geometry Approach , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[30]  Zhou Su,et al.  The Next Generation Vehicular Networks: A Content-Centric Framework , 2017, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[31]  Kyunghan Lee,et al.  Mobile data offloading: how much can WiFi deliver? , 2010, SIGCOMM 2010.

[32]  Wenbo Wang,et al.  Interference avoidance mechanisms in the hybrid cellular and device-to-device systems , 2009, 2009 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[33]  Wolfgang Kellerer,et al.  Location dependent resource allocation for mobile device-to-device communications , 2014, 2014 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[34]  Xuemin Shen,et al.  Operator controlled device-to-device communications in LTE-advanced networks , 2012, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[35]  Nei Kato,et al.  Device-to-device communications achieve efficient load balancing in LTE-advanced networks , 2014, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[36]  Xiang Cheng,et al.  Interference-aware graph based resource sharing for device-to-device communications underlaying cellular networks , 2013, 2013 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).