Patterns of anticoagulation following bioprosthetic valve implantation: observations from ANSWER.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines recommend a three-month administration of warfarin following bioprosthetic valve replacement (BVR). However, strong evidence supporting this recommendation is lacking, making process variation likely. METHODS In the ANSWER Registry, a total of 386 patients who had received either Epic or Biocor BVRs between May 2007 and August 2008 at 40 centers was enrolled. Patterns of discharge anticoagulation and outpatient International Normalized Ratio (INR) values were collected. Mortality, embolic, and bleeding events were assessed up to six months after BVR. RESULTS The median patient age was 74 years (interquartile range (IQR): 67-80 years), 39% of patients were female, and 65% were classified as a high thromboembolic risk. Warfarin was prescribed in 38% of all BVR patients, and in 49% of those at high risk of thromboembolism. The median time to therapeutic INR was nine days (IQR: 1 to 18 days), and 20% of patients failed to reach therapeutic levels. Among those patients achieving a therapeutic INR, 78% and 57% respectively had at least one subtherapeutic or supratherapeutic INR during the subsequent follow up to three months. During the follow up, patients treated with warfarin had similar rates of embolic events (2.8% versus 3.1%, p = 0.884), but a substantially higher incidence of bleeding than those not treated with warfarin (12% versus 3%, p = 0.0012). Among patients who were anticoagulated, those with supratherapeutic INR-values had a seven-fold higher risk for overt bleeding events (26% versus 3%). CONCLUSION Anticoagulation strategies after BVR are highly variable. In this population, challenges in achieving and maintaining therapeutic warfarin anticoagulation are common, and are associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Further studies are required to clarify the optimal post-BVR anticoagulation strategy.

[1]  S. Schulman,et al.  Decreasing warfarin sensitivity during the first three months after heart valve surgery: implications for dosing. , 2010, Thrombosis research.

[2]  S. Goldhaber,et al.  Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Salim Yusuf,et al.  Effect of clopidogrel added to aspirin in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Sean M. O'Brien,et al.  Trends in mitral valve surgery in the United States: results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. , 2009, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[6]  R. Califf,et al.  Scientific evidence underlying the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines. , 2009, JAMA.

[7]  Sean M. O'Brien,et al.  Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. , 2009, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[8]  C. Mestres,et al.  Antithrombotic therapy after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. , 2008, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[9]  P. Leprince,et al.  Antithrombotic therapy after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: ACTION Registry survey results. , 2008, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[10]  T. Gherli,et al.  Comparing warfarin to aspirin (WoA) after aortic valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical Epic heart valve bioprosthesis: results of the WoA Epic pilot trial. , 2007, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[11]  W. Kramer,et al.  Antiplatelet therapy early after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement is unnecessary in patients without thromboembolic risk factors. , 2007, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[12]  P. Vaughan,et al.  An audit of anticoagulation practice among UK cardiothoracic consultant surgeons following valve replacement/repair. , 2005, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[13]  T. Sundt,et al.  Is early anticoagulation with warfarin necessary after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement? , 2005, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[14]  C. Mestres,et al.  Triflusal versus oral anticoagulation for primary prevention of thromboembolism after bioprosthetic valve replacement (trac): prospective, randomized, co-operative trial. , 2005, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[15]  D. Singer,et al.  Antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. , 2004, Chest.

[16]  R. D'amico,et al.  Comparing Warfarin With Aspirin After Biological Aortic Valve Replacement: A Prospective Study , 2004, Circulation.

[17]  Yuchiao Chang,et al.  Anticoagulation therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: how well do randomized trials translate into clinical practice? , 2003, JAMA.

[18]  G. Samsa,et al.  Improving the quality of anticoagulation of patients with atrial fibrillation in managed care organizations: results of the managing anticoagulation services trial. , 2002, The American journal of medicine.

[19]  H. O'kane,et al.  Self-managed anticoagulation: results from a two-year prospective randomized trial with heart valve patients. , 2001, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[20]  J. Métras,et al.  Medtronic intact porcine bioprosthesis: 10 years' experience. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[21]  F. Laborde,et al.  Long-term results with the Sorin Pericarbon valve in the aortic position: a multicenter study. , 1998, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[22]  M. Joannidis,et al.  Management of venous thromboembolism. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  G F Tyers,et al.  Clinical performance of biological and mechanical prostheses. , 1995, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[24]  V. Fuster,et al.  High risk of thromboemboli early after bioprosthetic cardiac valve replacement. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.