Assessment of OMI near‐UV aerosol optical depth over land

This is the first comprehensive assessment of the aerosol optical depth (AOD) product retrieved from the near-UV observations by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) onboard the Aura satellite. The OMI-retrieved AOD by the ultraviolet (UV) aerosol algorithm (OMAERUV version 1.4.2) was evaluated using collocated Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) level 2.0 direct Sun AOD measurements over 8 years (2005-2012). A time series analysis of collocated satellite and ground-based AOD observations over 8 years shows no discernible drift in OMI's calibration. A rigorous validation analysis over 4 years (2005-2008) was carried out at 44 globally distributed AERONET land sites. The chosen locations are representative of major aerosol types such as smoke from biomass burning or wildfires, desert mineral dust, and urban/industrial pollutants. Correlation coefficient (p) values of 0.75 or better were obtained at 50 percent of the sites with about 33 percent of the sites in the analysis reporting regression line slope values larger than 0.70 but always less than unity. The combined AERONET-OMAERUV analysis of the 44 sites yielded a p of 0.81, slope of 0.79, Y intercept of 0.10, and 65 percent OMAERUV AOD falling within the expected uncertainty range (largest of 30 percent or 0.1) at 440 nanometers. The most accurate OMAERUV retrievals are reported over northern Africa locations where the predominant aerosol type is desert dust and cloud presence is less frequent. Reliable retrievals were documented at many sites characterized by urban-type aerosols with low to moderate AOD values, concentrated in the boundary layer. These results confirm that the near-ultraviolet observations are sensitive to the entire aerosol column. A simultaneous comparison of OMAERUV, Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Deep Blue, and Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR) AOD retrievals to AERONET measurements was also carried out to evaluate the OMAERUV accuracy in relation to those of the standard aerosol satellite products. The outcome of the comparison indicates that OMAERUV, MODIS Deep Blue, and MISR retrieval accuracies in arid and semiarid environments are statistically comparable.

[1]  Michael D. King,et al.  Aerosol properties over bright-reflecting source regions , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  Bernard Pinty,et al.  Techniques for the retrieval of aerosol properties over land and ocean using multiangle imaging , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[3]  Global Estimates of Average Ground-Level Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations from Satellite-Based Aerosol Optical Depth , 2010 .

[4]  Omar Torres,et al.  Improvements to the OMI near-UV aerosol algorithm using A-train CALIOP and AIRS observations , 2013 .

[5]  Pawan K. Bhartia,et al.  Comparison of Ozone Monitoring Instrument UV Aerosol Products with Aqua/Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer and Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer observations in 2006 , 2008 .

[6]  Sundar A. Christopher,et al.  Longwave radiative forcing of Saharan dust aerosols estimated from MODIS, MISR, and CERES observations on Terra , 2003 .

[7]  Nadine Gobron,et al.  Using angular and spectral shape similarity constraints to improve MISR aerosol and surface retrievals over land , 2005 .

[8]  E. Vermote,et al.  Operational remote sensing of tropospheric aerosol over land from EOS moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer , 1997 .

[9]  Hiren Jethva,et al.  Satellite-Based Evidence of Wavelength-Dependent Aerosol Absorption in Biomass Burning Smoke Inferred from Ozone Monitoring Instrument , 2011 .

[10]  C. Heald,et al.  North African dust export and deposition: A satellite and model perspective , 2012 .

[11]  Jun Wang,et al.  Intercomparison between multi-angle imaging spectroradiometer and sunphotometer aerosol optical thickness in dust source regions over China: implications for satellite aerosol retrievals and radiative forcing calculations , 2004 .

[12]  Pawan K. Bhartia,et al.  Science objectives of the ozone monitoring instrument , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  Glen Jaross,et al.  Validation of Ozone Monitoring Instrument level 1b data products , 2008 .

[14]  W. Collins,et al.  An AeroCom Initial Assessment - Optical Properties in Aerosol Component Modules of Global Models , 2005 .

[15]  Lorraine Remer,et al.  MISR Aerosol Product Attributes and Statistical Comparisons With MODIS , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  Jeffrey S. Reid,et al.  A system for operational aerosol optical depth data assimilation over global oceans , 2008 .

[17]  Dave Winker,et al.  The CALIPSO mission and initial results from CALIOP , 2006, SPIE Asia-Pacific Remote Sensing.

[18]  P. Levelt,et al.  Aerosols and surface UV products from Ozone Monitoring Instrument observations: An overview , 2007 .

[19]  Paul Ginoux,et al.  A Long-Term Record of Aerosol Optical Depth from TOMS Observations and Comparison to AERONET Measurements , 2002 .

[20]  A. Smirnov,et al.  AERONET-a federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol Characterization , 1998 .

[21]  Jun Wang,et al.  Constraints on aerosol sources using GEOS‐Chem adjoint and MODIS radiances, and evaluation with multisensor (OMI, MISR) data , 2013 .

[22]  Lorraine A. Remer,et al.  Retrieving Aerosol in a Cloudy Environment: Aerosol Availability as a Function of Spatial and Temporal Resolution , 2012 .

[23]  John P. Burrows,et al.  On the improvement of NO 2 satellite retrievals – aerosol impact on the airmass factors , 2009 .

[24]  D. Tanré,et al.  Remote Sensing of Tropospheric Aerosols from Space: Past, Present, and Future. , 1999 .

[25]  Reinhard Beer,et al.  Overview of the EOS aura mission , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[26]  Heikki Saari,et al.  The ozone monitoring instrument , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[27]  P. Bhartia,et al.  Derivation of aerosol properties from satellite measurements of backscattered ultraviolet radiation , 1998 .

[28]  B. Holben,et al.  Validation of MODIS aerosol optical depth retrieval over land , 2002 .

[29]  D. Chu,et al.  Improving National Air Quality Forecasts with Satellite Aerosol Observations , 2005 .

[30]  F. Maignan,et al.  Remote sensing of aerosols over land surfaces from POLDER‐ADEOS‐1 polarized measurements , 2001 .

[31]  M. Brauer,et al.  Global Estimates of Ambient Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations from Satellite-Based Aerosol Optical Depth: Development and Application , 2010, Environmental health perspectives.

[32]  Alexander Smirnov,et al.  Multiangle Imaging SpectroRadiometer global aerosol product assessment by comparison with the Aerosol Robotic Network , 2010 .

[33]  E. O'connor,et al.  The CloudSat mission and the A-train: a new dimension of space-based observations of clouds and precipitation , 2002 .

[34]  T. Eck,et al.  Global evaluation of the Collection 5 MODIS dark-target aerosol products over land , 2010 .

[35]  Jun Wang,et al.  Intercomparison between satellite‐derived aerosol optical thickness and PM2.5 mass: Implications for air quality studies , 2003 .