Axioms for the category of Hilbert spaces

We provide axioms that guarantee a category is equivalent to that of continuous linear functions between Hilbert spaces. The axioms are purely categorical and do not presuppose any analytical structure. This addresses a question about the mathematical foundations of quantum theory raised in reconstruction programmes such as those of von Neumann, Mackey, Jauch, Piron, Abramsky, and Coecke. Quantum mechanics has mathematically been firmly founded on Hilbert spaces and operators between them for nearly a century [21]. There has been continuous inquiry into the special status of this foundation since [18, 5, 12]. How are the mathematical axioms to be interpreted physically? Can the theory be reconstructed from a different framework whose axioms can be interpreted physically? Such reconstruction programmes involve a mathematical reformulation of (a generalisation of) the theory of Hilbert spaces and their operators, such as operator algebras [16], orthomodular lattices [10, 17], and, most recently, categorical quantum mechanics [1, 4]. The latter uses the framework of category theory [15], and emphasises operators more than their underlying Hilbert spaces. It postulates a category with structure that models physical features of quantum theory [9]. The question of how “to justify the use of Hilbert space” [17] then becomes: which axioms guarantee that a category is equivalent to that of continuous linear functions between Hilbert spaces? This article answers that mathematical question. The axioms are purely categorical in nature, and do not presuppose any analytical structure such as continuity, complex numbers, or probabilities. The approach is similar to Lawvere’s categorical characterisation of the theory of sets [14].

[1]  Samson Abramsky,et al.  A categorical semantics of quantum protocols , 2004, Proceedings of the 19th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 2004..

[2]  C. Heunen,et al.  Limits in dagger categories , 2018, 1803.06651.

[3]  A. Kapustin Is quantum mechanics exact , 2013 .

[4]  M. P. Soler,et al.  Characterization of hilbert spaces by orthomodular spaces , 1995 .

[5]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  Handbook of Quantum logic and Quantum Structures , 2007 .

[6]  Robert W. Spekkens,et al.  Foundations of Quantum Mechanics , 2007 .

[7]  Huzihiro Araki,et al.  A remark on Piron's paper , 1966 .

[8]  J. Baez Division Algebras and Quantum Theory , 2011, 1101.5690.

[9]  L. Hardy Quantum Theory From Five Reasonable Axioms , 2001, quant-ph/0101012.

[10]  C. Heunen,et al.  Categories for Quantum Theory , 2019 .

[11]  D. A. Edwards The mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics , 1979, Synthese.

[12]  A. Grinbaum Reconstruction of Quantum Theory , 2007, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[13]  Saunders MacLane,et al.  Duality for groups , 1950 .

[14]  C. Piron,et al.  On the Foundations of Quantum Physics , 1976 .

[15]  E. Hellinger,et al.  Grundlagen für eine Theorie der unendlichen Matrizen , 1910 .

[16]  S. Holland,et al.  Orthomodularity in infinite dimensions; a theorem of M. Solèr , 1995 .

[17]  F W Lawvere,et al.  AN ELEMENTARY THEORY OF THE CATEGORY OF SETS. , 1964, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  H. Groß Hilbert lattices: New results and unsolved problems , 1990 .

[19]  J. V. Michalowicz,et al.  CAHIERS DE TOPOLOGIE ET GÉOMÉTRIE DIFFÉRENTIELLE CATÉGORIQUES , 2018 .

[20]  Chris Heunen,et al.  An embedding theorem for Hilbert categories , 2008, 0811.1448.

[21]  W. John Wilbur,et al.  On characterizing the standard quantum logics , 1977 .

[22]  Bart Jacobs,et al.  Quantum Logic in Dagger Kernel Categories , 2009, QPL@MFPS.

[23]  Peter Selinger,et al.  Dagger Compact Closed Categories and Completely Positive Maps: (Extended Abstract) , 2007, QPL.

[24]  Dominic R. Verity,et al.  ∞-Categories for the Working Mathematician , 2018 .

[25]  P. Porcelli,et al.  On rings of operators , 1967 .

[26]  M. Karvonen Biproducts without pointedness , 2018, 1801.06488.