From ‘reckless’ to ‘mindful’ in the use of outcome data to inform service-level performance management: perspectives from child mental health

In the recent report on patient safety in the National Health Service (NHS) in England, Don Berwick calls on the NHS to align the necessity for increased ‘accountability’ with the necessity to ‘abandon blame as a tool’ in order to develop a ‘transparent learning culture’.1 Sir Bruce Keogh, Medical Director NHS, and colleagues’ recent analysis of outlier hospitals based on mortality data marks a key step on this journey, but has led to high-profile debate about the risk of possible ‘reckless’ (Sir Bruce Keogh's term) use of data if appropriate parameters are not established.2 ,3 If these and other equivalent proxies for outcomes are to be used safely and effectively to support performance management and quality improvement in the ways envisioned by both Keogh and Berwick, it is crucial to establish clearly agreed operational procedures. Drawing on our experience of collecting and interpreting outcome data in the challenging context of child mental health across the UK, we suggest adoption of a MINDFUL framework involving consideration of m ultiple perspectives, i nterpreting differences in the light of current evidence base, focus on n egative differences when triangulated with other data, d irected discussions based on ‘what if this were a true difference’ (employing the 75–25% rule), use of f unnel plots as a starting point to consider outliers, appreciation of u ncertainty as a key contextual reality and the use of l earning collaborations to support appropriate implementation and action strategies. Any attempt to measure ‘impact’ of a service using a given ‘outcome’ is complex. The Keogh report acknowledges: “two different measures of mortality, HSMR [Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio] and SHMI [Summary Hospital Level Mortality Indicator] generated two completely different lists of outlier trusts.” This was ‘solved’ by using both lists, but with a suggestion to move to …

[1]  Anthony L. Hemmelgarn,et al.  The effects of organizational climate and interorganizational coordination on the quality and outcomes of children's service systems. , 1998, Child abuse & neglect.

[2]  M. Mckee Improving the safety of patients in England , 2013, BMJ.

[3]  A. Goodman,et al.  Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Added Value Scores: evaluating effectiveness in child mental health interventions , 2009, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[4]  S. Nashef,et al.  Eurp-pean system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (Euro SCORE) , 1999 .

[5]  M. Rutter,et al.  Rutter's Child and Adolescent Psychiatry , 2002 .

[6]  T. Ford,et al.  Patient-reported outcomes in child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS): Use of idiographic and standardized measures , 2012, Journal of mental health.

[7]  C. Hollis,et al.  The use of routine outcome measures in two child and adolescent mental health services: a completed audit cycle , 2013, BMC Psychiatry.

[8]  P. Yates,et al.  Child and adolescent mental health service use. HoNOSCA as an outcome measure. , 2000, The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science.

[9]  L. Bickman,et al.  The Relationship Between Change in Therapeutic Alliance Ratings and Improvement in Youth Symptom Severity: Whose Ratings Matter the Most? , 2012, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[10]  Robert Goodman,et al.  Comparing the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Child Behavior Checklist: Is Small Beautiful? , 1999, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[11]  David J Spiegelhalter,et al.  Funnel plots for comparing institutional performance , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[13]  S. Shepperd,et al.  Evidence-based healthcare and public health : how to make decisions about health services and public health , 2009 .

[14]  Richard Lilford,et al.  Use and misuse of process and outcome data in managing performance of acute medical care: avoiding institutional stigma , 2004, The Lancet.

[15]  James Robert Brašić,et al.  A children's global assessment scale (CGAS). , 1983, Archives of general psychiatry.

[16]  F. Verhulst,et al.  Using Rating Scales in a Clinical Context , 2009 .

[17]  Alan E. Kazdin,et al.  Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents , 2003 .

[18]  S. Lemeshow,et al.  European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). , 1999, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.