Co-evolutionary IS-Alignment: A Complex Adaptive Systems Perspective

Many studies have investigated the effects of information technology (IT) in achieving organizational performance. However, despite substantial IT investments, organizations often fail to improve organizational performance using IT. This failure could be the result of a lack of Business-IT alignment. Recently , scholars and practitioners have adopted a complexity science approach to better address the many interwoven IT, organizational and environmental turbulence challenges. These efforts resulted in the emergence of the complexity-based concept of co-evolutionary IS/IT-alignment (COISA). COISA involves "the series of coevolutionary moves that makes IT aligned over time." However, the notion of COISA remains conceptual, and further operationalization in preparation for more empirical evidence seems appropriate. Therefore, this study aims to provide further clarification on the conceptualization of COISA in turbulent environments. We conducted a structured literature review using a theoretical foundation of Complex Adaptive Systems theory. In this effort, we developed a COISA model composed of five continuous alignment processes characterized by co-evolutionary moves toward alignment , situated in two organizational contexts. This model provides a basis for further empirical research on COISA.

[1]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations , 1993, IBM Syst. J..

[2]  Blaize Horner Reich,et al.  IT alignment: an annotated bibliography , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[3]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  Coevolving Systems and the Organization of Agile Software Development , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Ole Hanseth,et al.  Innovation Of, In, On Infrastructures: Articulating the Role of Architecture in Information Infrastructure Evolution , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Sue Newell,et al.  Understanding Project Survival in an ES Environment: A Sociomaterial Practice Perspective , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Ramiro Montealegre,et al.  A Coevolutionary View of Information Services Development: Lessons from the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Kevin J. Dooley,et al.  A Complex Adaptive Systems Model of Organization Change , 1997 .

[8]  John R. Koza,et al.  Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. , 1995, Artificial Life.

[9]  Bart van den Hooff,et al.  Business IT Alignment through the Lens of Complexity Science , 2016, ICIS.

[10]  Jerry N. Luftman,et al.  Enablers and Inhibitors of Business-IT Alignment , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Evolving Work Routines: Adaptive Routinization of Information Technology in Healthcare , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Patrick Mikalef,et al.  Strategic Alignment Between IT Flexibility and Dynamic Capabilities: An Empirical Investigation , 2021, Int. J. IT Bus. Alignment Gov..

[13]  Peter M. Allen,et al.  A co-evolutionary complex systems perspective on information systems , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[14]  Jerry N. Luftman,et al.  An Update on Business-IT Alignment: "A Line" Has Been Drawn , 2007, MIS Q. Executive.

[15]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance , 2000 .

[16]  Ute Fischer,et al.  Informed by knowledge : expert performance in complex situations , 2011 .

[17]  Arun Rai,et al.  Research Commentary - Reframing the Dominant Quests of Information Systems Strategy Research for Complex Adaptive Business Systems , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Looking Toward the Future of IT-Business Strategic Alignment through the Past: A Meta-Analysis , 2014, MIS Q..

[19]  Yajiong Xue,et al.  Unraveling the Alignment Paradox: How Does Business - IT Alignment Shape Organizational Agility? , 2017, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  Christina Soh,et al.  Aligning with new digital strategy: A dynamic capabilities approach , 2017, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Adel M. Aladwani Change management strategies for successful ERP implementation , 2001, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[22]  Debora R. Hammond,et al.  The Science of Synthesis: Exploring the Social Implications of General Systems Theory , 2010 .

[23]  Patrick Mikalef,et al.  Driving organizational sustainability-oriented innovation capabilities: a complex adaptive systems perspective , 2017 .

[24]  Iris Vessey,et al.  The Dynamics of Sustainable IS Alignment: The Case for IS Adaptivity , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Stan Karanasios,et al.  HOW SHOULD TECHNOLOGY-MEDIATED ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE BE EXPLAINED ? A COMPARISON OF THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF CRITICAL REALISM AND ACTIVITY THEORY 1 , 2013 .

[26]  Javier Busquets,et al.  Discovery paths: exploring emergence and IT evolutionary design in cross-border M&As. Analysing grupo Santander’s acquisition of abbey (2004–2009) , 2015, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  ORGANIZATIONS: A MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE , 2007 .

[28]  Bart van den Hooff,et al.  An Explanatory Study on the Co-evolutionary Mechanisms of Business IT Alignment , 2017, ICIS.

[29]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link? , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[30]  Christine Legner,et al.  Strategic Enterprise Architecture Management , 2012 .

[31]  Thanos Papadopoulos,et al.  Information systems strategy: Past, present, future? , 2012, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Andy Weeger,et al.  How Contradictions Facilitate Evolutionary Transformation: an Exploration into the dynamics of Business-IT Alignment from the Perspective of Activity Theory , 2016, ECIS.

[33]  J. Ford,et al.  Resistance to Change: The Rest of the Story , 2008 .

[34]  Hind Benbya,et al.  Using coevolutionary and complexity theories to improve IS alignment: a multi-level approach , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[35]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  Conceptualizing the Dynamic Strategic Alignment Competency , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..