Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles.

Over recent years, drug release/dissolution from solid pharmaceutical dosage forms has been the subject of intense and profitable scientific developments. Whenever a new solid dosage form is developed or produced, it is necessary to ensure that drug dissolution occurs in an appropriate manner. The pharmaceutical industry and the registration authorities do focus, nowadays, on drug dissolution studies. The quantitative analysis of the values obtained in dissolution/release tests is easier when mathematical formulas that express the dissolution results as a function of some of the dosage forms characteristics are used. In some cases, these mathematic models are derived from the theoretical analysis of the occurring process. In most of the cases the theoretical concept does not exist and some empirical equations have proved to be more appropriate. Drug dissolution from solid dosage forms has been described by kinetic models in which the dissolved amount of drug (Q) is a function of the test time, t or Q=f(t). Some analytical definitions of the Q(t) function are commonly used, such as zero order, first order, Hixson-Crowell, Weibull, Higuchi, Baker-Lonsdale, Korsmeyer-Peppas and Hopfenberg models. Other release parameters, such as dissolution time (tx%), assay time (tx min), dissolution efficacy (ED), difference factor (f1), similarity factor (f2) and Rescigno index (xi1 and xi2) can be used to characterize drug dissolution/release profiles.

[1]  W I Higuchi,et al.  Drug release from wax matrices. I. Analysis of data with first-order kinetics and with the diffusion-controlled model. , 1968, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[2]  J. Rogers,et al.  Dissolution of fludrocortisone from phospholipid coprecipitates. , 1992, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[3]  W I Higuchi,et al.  Investigation of factors influencing release of solid drug dispersed in inert matrices. , 1966, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[4]  J. Polli,et al.  Methods to compare dissolution profiles and a rationale for wide dissolution specifications for metoprolol tartrate tablets. , 1997, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[5]  Richard W. Baker,et al.  Controlled release: mechanisms and release. , 1974 .

[6]  V. Pillay,et al.  In vitro release modulation from crosslinked pellets for site-specific drug delivery to the gastrointestinal tract. I. Comparison of pH-responsive drug release and associated kinetics. , 1999, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[7]  W. Higuchi,et al.  Investigation of factors influencing release of solid drug dispersed in inert matrices. 3. Quantitative studies involving the polyethylene plastic matrix. , 1966, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[8]  A. Hoffman,et al.  Modeling of drug release from erodible tablets. , 1997, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[9]  S. Redner,et al.  Introduction To Percolation Theory , 2018 .

[10]  John E. Hogan,et al.  MATHEMATICAL MODELLING OF DRUG RELEASE FROM HYDROXYPROPYLMETHYLCELLULOSE MATRICES : EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE , 1991 .

[11]  T. Minouchi,et al.  Interpretation of dissolution rate data from in vitro testing of compressed tablets , 1977, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[12]  S. Kitazawa,et al.  Effects of hardness on the disintegration time and the dissolution rate of uncoated caffeine tablets , 1975, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[13]  D J Weidler,et al.  Pharmacokinetic profile of flosequinan in patients with compromised renal function. , 1993, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[14]  J. A. Goldsmith,et al.  On methods of expressing dissolution rate data , 1978, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[15]  N. Peppas,et al.  Mechanisms of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers , 1983 .

[16]  H. Jun,et al.  Preparation and in vitro dissolution tests of egg albumin microcapsules of nitrofurantoin , 1983 .

[17]  K. A. Khan,et al.  Effect of compaction pressure on the dissolution efficiency of some direct compression systems. , 1972, Pharmaceutica acta Helvetiae.

[18]  G. C. Walker,et al.  Influence of shape factors on kinetics of drug release from matrix tablets. II. Experimental. , 1974, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[19]  J. W. Moore,et al.  Mathematical comparison of dissolution profiles , 1996 .

[20]  S. Chow,et al.  Statistical comparison between dissolution profiles of drug products. , 1997, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[21]  J. Wagner Interpretation of percent dissolved-time plots derived from in vitro testing of conventional tablets and capsules. , 1969, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[22]  W I Higuchi,et al.  Drug release from wax matrices. II. Application of a mixture theory to the suflanilamide--wax system. , 1968, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[23]  D. R. Lu,et al.  Nonlinear data fitting for controlled release devices: An integrated computer program , 1996 .

[24]  J. L. Gill Repeated Measurement: Split-Plot Trend Analysis Versus Analysis of First Differences , 1988 .

[25]  T. Higuchi,et al.  Rate of release of medicaments from ointment bases containing drugs in suspension. , 1961, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[26]  John Crank,et al.  The Mathematics Of Diffusion , 1956 .

[27]  H. L. Ju,et al.  ON THE ASSESSMENT OF SIMILARITY A SIMULATION STUDY OF DRUG DISSOLUTION PROFILES , 1997 .

[28]  F Langenbucher,et al.  Letters to the Editor: Linearization of dissolution rate curves by the Weibull distribution , 1972, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[29]  T. Pal,et al.  In-Vitro Release Kinetics of Salbutamolsulphate Microcapsules Coated with Both Eudragit Rs 100 and Eudragit RL 100 , 1994 .

[30]  Physical interpretation of parameters in the Rosin‐Rammler‐Sperling‐Weibull distribution for drug release from controlled release dosage forms , 1980, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[31]  D R Lu,et al.  Optima: a windows-based program for computer-aided optimization of controlled-release dosage forms. , 1996, Pharmaceutical development and technology.

[32]  W I Higuchi,et al.  Investigation of factors influencing release of solid drug dispersed in inert matrices. II. Quantitation of procedures. , 1966, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[33]  S. Turco,et al.  A simple model based on first order kinetics to explain release of highly water soluble drugs from porous dicalcium phosphate dihydrate matrices , 1995 .

[34]  E. Doelker,et al.  [Formulation of sustained release tablets. I. Inert matrices]. , 1980, Pharmaceutica acta Helvetiae.

[35]  Versatile kinetic-approach to analysis of dissolution data. , 1978, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[36]  W. Higuchi,et al.  Analysis of data on the medicament release from ointments. , 1962, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[37]  Richard W. Baker,et al.  Controlled Release of Biologically Active Agents , 1987 .

[38]  M Gibaldi,et al.  Establishment of sink conditions in dissolution rate determinations. Theoretical considerations and application to nondisintegrating dosage forms. , 1967, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[39]  R. Fassihi,et al.  Application of binary polymer system in drug release rate modulation. 2. Influence of formulation variables and hydrodynamic conditions on release kinetics. , 1997, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[40]  H Leuenberger,et al.  Dissolution properties of praziquantel--PVP systems. , 1998, Pharmaceutica acta Helvetiae.

[41]  T. Higuchi MECHANISM OF SUSTAINED-ACTION MEDICATION. THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF RATE OF RELEASE OF SOLID DRUGS DISPERSED IN SOLID MATRICES. , 1963, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[42]  N. Peppas Analysis of Fickian and non-Fickian drug release from polymers. , 1985, Pharmaceutica acta Helvetiae.

[43]  G. Milosovich,et al.  Dissolution rate studies. II. Dissolution of particles under conditions of rapid agitation. , 1963, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[44]  V. Pillay,et al.  Evaluation and comparison of dissolution data derived from different modified release dosage forms: an alternative method. , 1998, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[45]  V. Shah,et al.  Statistical Assessment of Mean Differences between Two Dissolution Data Sets* , 1996 .

[46]  D. G. Dixon,et al.  Zero-order release from biphasic polymer hydrogels , 1995 .

[47]  J. Bonny,et al.  Matrix type controlled release systems: I. Effect of percolation on drug dissolution kinetics. , 1991, Pharmaceutica acta Helvetiae.

[48]  Khan Ka,et al.  Effect of compaction pressure on the dissolution efficiency of some direct compression systems. , 1972 .

[49]  A. W. Hixson,et al.  Dependence of Reaction Velocity upon surface and Agitation , 1931 .

[50]  K. A. Khan The concept of dissolution efficiency , 1975, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[51]  S. Chow,et al.  Statistical Evaluation of Similarity Factor f_2 as a Criterion for Assessment of Similarity Between Dissolution Profiles , 1997 .

[52]  S. Chow,et al.  Statistical Issues on the FDA Conjugated Estrogen Tablets Bioequivalence Guidance , 1996 .

[53]  M. Nakano,et al.  Controlled release of 3',5'-diester prodrugs of 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine from poly-L-lactic acid microspheres. , 1990, Journal of Pharmacy and Science.

[54]  J. Polli,et al.  Methods to Compare Dissolution Profiles* , 1996 .

[55]  D. Chulia,et al.  Statistical Optimization of a Controlled Release Formulation Obtained by a Double Compression Process: Application of an Hadamard Matrix and a Factorial Design , 1989 .

[56]  G. C. Walker,et al.  Influence of shape factors on kinetics of drug release from matrix tablets. I. Theoretical. , 1974, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[57]  Hans Leuenberger,et al.  Modelling of drug release from polymer matrices: Effect of drug loading , 1995 .

[58]  W. Higuchi,et al.  Investigation of factors influencing release of solid drug dispersed in inert matrices. IV. Some studies involving the polyvinyl chloride matrix. , 1966, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.