Participatory Web Users' Information Activities and Credibility Assessment *

Assessment of information credibility is a ubiquitous human activity given that people constantly make decisions and selections based on the value of information in a variety of information seeking and use contexts. Today, people are increasingly engaging in diverse online activities beyond searching for and reading information, including activities such as creating, tagging and rating content, shopping, and listening to and watching multimedia content. The Web 2.0 environment presents new challenges for people because the burden of information evaluation is shifted from professional gatekeepers to individual information consumers. At the same time, however, it also provides unprecedented opportunities for people to use tools and features that help them to make informed credibility judgments by relying on other people's ratings and recommendations. This paper introduces fundamental notions and dimensions of credibility, and contends that credibility assessment can be best understood with respect to human information behavior because it encompasses both the level of effort people exert as well as the heuristics they employ to evaluate information. The paper reports on a survey study investigating people's credibility judgments with respect to online information, focusing on the constructs, heuristics, and interactions involved in people's credibility assessment processes within the context of their everyday life information activities. Using an online activity diary method, empirical data about people's online activities and their associated credibility assessments were collected at multiple points throughout the day for three days. The results indicate that distinct credibility assessment heuristics are emerging as people engage in diverse online activities involving more user-generated and multimedia content. A heuristic approach suggests that people apply mental shortcuts or rules of thumb in order to minimize the amount of cognitive effort and time required to make credibility judgments. The paper discusses why a heuristic approach is key to reaching a more comprehensive understanding of people's credibility assessments within the information-abundant online environment.

[1]  Joseph Janes,et al.  Networked information retrieval and organization , 1996 .

[2]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Experience Sampling Method Applications to Communication Research Questions. , 1996 .

[3]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  Cruising is Believing?: Comparing Internet and Traditional Sources on Media Credibility Measures , 1998 .

[4]  David Robins,et al.  Aesthetics and credibility in web site design , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[5]  Joseph Janes,et al.  Networked information retrieval and organization: issues and questions , 1996 .

[6]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Digital Media and Youth: Unparalleled Opportunity and Unprecedented Responsibility , 2008 .

[7]  Patrick Wilson Second-hand knowledge , 1983 .

[8]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  What makes Web sites credible?: a report on a large quantitative study , 2001, CHI.

[9]  Kim Soojung,et al.  Questioners' credibility judgments of answers in a social question and answer site , 2010 .

[10]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[11]  Helena Francke,et al.  In search of credibility: pupils' information practices in learning environments , 2009, Inf. Res..

[12]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Understanding Judgment of Information Quality and Cognitive Authority in the WWW , 1998 .

[13]  Traci Hong,et al.  The influence of structural and message features on Web site credibility , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[14]  Soo Young Rieh Judgement of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web , 2002 .

[15]  Jacquelyn A. Burkell,et al.  Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[16]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do , 2002, UBIQ.

[17]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Prominence-interpretation theory: explaining how people assess credibility online , 2003, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[18]  H. Kelley,et al.  Communication And Persuasion , 1953 .

[19]  Soo Young Rieh On the Web at home: Information seeking and Web searching in the home environment , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  Carolyn M. Hall,et al.  Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science , 1971 .

[21]  Soo Young Rieh,et al.  A diary study of credibility assessment in everyday life information activities on the web: Preliminary findings , 2010, ASIST.

[22]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Credibility for the 21st Century: Integrating Perspectives on Source, Message, and Media Credibility in the Contemporary Media Environment , 2003 .

[23]  Carol L. Barry User-defined relevance criteria: an exploratory study , 1994 .

[24]  S. Sundar The MAIN Model : A Heuristic Approach to Understanding Technology Effects on Credibility , 2007 .

[25]  Patrick Wilson,et al.  The Cognitive and the Social@@@The Social Construction of Science: A Comparative Study of Goal Direction Research Evolution, and Legitimation.@@@Second-Hand Knowledge: An Inquiry into Cognitive Authority. , 1983 .

[26]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  The credibility of volunteered geographic information , 2008 .

[27]  R. David Lankes,et al.  Credibility on the internet: shifting from authority to reliability , 2008, J. Documentation.

[28]  N. Belkin,et al.  A classification of interactions with information , 2002 .

[29]  Soo Young Rieh,et al.  College Students' Credibility Judgments in the Information-Seeking Process , 2008 .

[30]  Soo Young Rieh,et al.  Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[31]  C. Nass,et al.  Differential Criteria for Evaluating Credibility of Newspapers and TV News , 1989 .

[32]  Soo Young Rieh Credibility and Cognitive Authority of Information , 2010 .

[33]  Soo Young Rieh,et al.  Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework , 2007, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[34]  Soo Young Rieh Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..