Quantum chemical investigation of hydrogen‐bond strengths and partition into donor and acceptor contributions

We present a simple increment model for use in the rapid scoring of hydrogen bond strengths employing 15 chemically diverse donor and 28 acceptor terms. The increments cover a large variety of hydrogen bond donor and acceptor groups and are more specific than SYBYL atom types. The increments have been fitted to quantum chemical ab initio interaction energies of 81 small hydrogen‐bonded complexes determined at the level of second‐order Møller‐Plesset perturbation theory (MP2). The complexes have been chosen such as to represent the most important types of donor‐acceptor pairs found in biological systems. Sulphur is found to be a strong hydrogen bond acceptor while its donor capacities are weak. By taking CH acidic H donors into account, a linear correlation between MP2 energies and the increment model with a coefficient of correlation of r2 = 0.994 has been accomplished. The transferability of the fitted parameters has been assessed on a second set of complexes including larger molecules of biological relevance. Very good agreement has been achieved for noncyclic hydrogen bonds. Cooperative effects are not accounted for by the current increment model. For this reason, binding energies of strong cyclic hydrogen bonds, as e.g. present in DNA base pairs, are underestimated by about 30–40%. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem, 2007

[1]  T. Halgren Merck molecular force field. II. MMFF94 van der Waals and electrostatic parameters for intermolecular interactions , 1996 .

[2]  Parr,et al.  Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. , 1988, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[3]  Hans-Joachim Böhm,et al.  LUDI: rule-based automatic design of new substituents for enzyme inhibitor leads , 1992, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[4]  D. J. Price,et al.  Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[5]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Evaluation of the FLEXX incremental construction algorithm for protein–ligand docking , 1999, Proteins.

[6]  M. Plesset,et al.  Note on an Approximation Treatment for Many-Electron Systems , 1934 .

[7]  Hans W. Horn,et al.  ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE CALCULATIONS ON WORKSTATION COMPUTERS: THE PROGRAM SYSTEM TURBOMOLE , 1989 .

[8]  A. Stone Universal Models of Hydrogen Bonding , 2000 .

[9]  Hans W. Horn,et al.  Fully optimized contracted Gaussian basis sets for atoms Li to Kr , 1992 .

[10]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  An ab Initio Quantum Mechanical Study of Hydrogen-Bonded Complexes of Biological Interest , 2002 .

[11]  G. Jansen,et al.  A quantitative measure of bond polarity from the electron localization function and the theory of atoms in molecules , 2001 .

[12]  John A. Pople,et al.  Approximate fourth-order perturbation theory of the electron correlation energy , 1978 .

[13]  Thomas Frauenheim,et al.  Hydrogen bonding and stacking interactions of nucleic acid base pairs: A density-functional-theory based treatment , 2001 .

[14]  Hans-Joachim Böhm,et al.  Prediction of binding constants of protein ligands: A fast method for the prioritization of hits obtained from de novo design or 3D database search programs , 1998, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[15]  Jirí Cerný,et al.  Benchmark database of accurate (MP2 and CCSD(T) complete basis set limit) interaction energies of small model complexes, DNA base pairs, and amino acid pairs. , 2006, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[16]  Pavel Hobza,et al.  True stabilization energies for the optimal planar hydrogen-bonded and stacked structures of guanine...cytosine, adenine...thymine, and their 9- and 1-methyl derivatives: complete basis set calculations at the MP2 and CCSD(T) levels and comparison with experiment. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[17]  S. Grimme Semiempirical hybrid density functional with perturbative second-order correlation. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[18]  F. Wennmohs,et al.  Theoretical investigation of weak hydrogen bonds to sulfur , 2003 .

[19]  F. Escudero,et al.  Atoms in molecules , 1982 .

[20]  A. Becke Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange , 1993 .

[21]  S. F. Boys,et al.  The calculation of small molecular interactions by the differences of separate total energies. Some procedures with reduced errors , 1970 .

[22]  G. A. Jeffrey,et al.  An Introduction to Hydrogen Bonding , 1997 .

[23]  Angela K. Wilson,et al.  Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. IX. The atoms gallium through krypton , 1993 .

[24]  N. L. Allinger,et al.  Hydrogen bonding in MM2 , 1988 .

[25]  A. Daniel Boese,et al.  Predicting the binding energies of H-bonded complexes: A comparative DFT study , 1999 .

[26]  S. Xantheas Recent theoretical and experimental advances in hydrogen bonded clusters , 2000 .

[27]  W. Kohn,et al.  Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects , 1965 .

[28]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Development and Testing of the OPLS All-Atom Force Field on Conformational Energetics and Properties of Organic Liquids , 1996 .

[29]  Y. Mo Probing the nature of hydrogen bonds in DNA base pairs , 2006, Journal of molecular modeling.

[30]  N. Kestner He–He Interaction in the SCF–MO Approximation , 1968 .

[31]  P. Kollman,et al.  A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules , 1995 .

[32]  K. Merz,et al.  Large-scale validation of a quantum mechanics based scoring function: predicting the binding affinity and the binding mode of a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[33]  T. H. Dunning Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen , 1989 .

[34]  Florian Weigend,et al.  Auxiliary basis sets for main row atoms and transition metals and their use to approximate Coulomb potentials , 1997 .

[35]  N. Sheppard Hydrogen Bonding , 1971, Nature.

[36]  A. Becke,et al.  Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior. , 1988, Physical review. A, General physics.

[37]  Juan J. Novoa,et al.  Evaluation of the Density Functional Approximation on the Computation of Hydrogen Bond Interactions , 1995 .

[38]  Hans Peter Lüthi,et al.  Interaction energies of van der Waals and hydrogen bonded systems calculated using density functional theory: Assessing the PW91 model , 2001 .

[39]  Masuhiro Mikami,et al.  Effects of basis set and electron correlation on the calculated interaction energies of hydrogen bonding complexes: MP2/cc-pV5Z calculations of H2O–MeOH,H2O–Me2O,H2O–H2CO, MeOH–MeOH, and HCOOH–HCOOH complexes , 1999 .

[40]  R. Ahlrichs,et al.  Efficient molecular numerical integration schemes , 1995 .

[41]  S. Suhai,et al.  Conformational and energetic properties of the ammonia dimer—comparison of post‐Hartree—Fock and density functional methods , 1996 .

[42]  Hans-Joachim Böhm,et al.  The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure , 1994, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[43]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Multiple automatic base selection: Protein–ligand docking based on incremental construction without manual intervention , 1997, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[44]  A. Rappé,et al.  Ab Initio Calculation of Nonbonded Interactions: Are We There Yet? , 2000 .

[45]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Energy parameters in polypeptides. VII. Geometric parameters, partial atomic charges, nonbonded interactions, hydrogen bond interactions, and intrinsic torsional potentials for the naturally occurring amino acids , 1975 .

[46]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[47]  Martin Head-Gordon,et al.  Quadratic configuration interaction. A general technique for determining electron correlation energies , 1987 .

[48]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[49]  Christof Hättig,et al.  CC2 excitation energy calculations on large molecules using the resolution of the identity approximation , 2000 .

[50]  B. A. Hess,et al.  Ab Initio Calculations of Supramolecular Recognition Modes. Cyclic versus Noncyclic Hydrogen Bonding in the Formic Acid/Formamide System , 1994 .

[51]  Jenn-Huei Lii,et al.  Directional hydrogen bonding in the MM3 force field: II , 1998, Journal of Computational Chemistry.

[52]  H. Berendsen,et al.  A consistent empirical potential for water–protein interactions , 1984 .

[53]  Christof Hättig,et al.  Implementation of RI-CC2 triplet excitation energies with an application to trans-azobenzene , 2002 .

[54]  J. Bajorath,et al.  Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[55]  G. V. Paolini,et al.  Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes , 1997, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[56]  Willis B. Person,et al.  Properties of Hydrogen-Bonded Complexes Obtained from the B3LYP Functional with 6-31G(d,p) and 6-31+G(d,p) Basis Sets: Comparison with MP2/6-31+G(d,p) Results and Experimental Data , 1995 .

[57]  A. Schäfer,et al.  Fully optimized contracted Gaussian basis sets of triple zeta valence quality for atoms Li to Kr , 1994 .

[58]  William L. Jorgensen,et al.  Ab Initio Study Of Hydrogen-Bonded Complexes Of Small Organic Molecules With Water , 1998 .