Atmospheric effects on ejecta emplacement

Laboratory experiments allow the investigation of complex interactions between impacts and an atmosphere. Although small in scale, they can provide essential first-order constraints on the processes affecting late-stage ballistic ejecta and styles of ejecta emplacement around much larger craters on planetary surfaces. The laboratory experiments involved impacting different fine-grained particulate targets under varying atmospheric pressure and density (different gas compositions). During crater formation, ballistic ejecta form the classic cone-shaped profile observed under vacuum conditions. As atmospheric density increases (for a given pressure), however, the ejecta curtain bulges at the base and pinches above. This systematic change in the ejecta curtain reflects the combined effects of deceleration of ejecta smaller than a critical size and entrainment of these ejecta within atmospheric vortices created as the outward moving wall of ejecta displaces the atmosphere. Additionally, a systematic change in emplacement style occurs as a function of atmospheric pressure (largely independent of density): contiguous ejecta rampart superposing ballistically emplaced deposits (0.06 to 0.3 bar); ejecta flow lobes (0.3 to 0.7 bar); and radial patterns (>0.8 bar). Underlying processes controlling such systematic changes in emplacement style were revealed by observing the evolution of the ejecta curtain, by changing target materials (including layered targets and low-density particulates), by varying atmospheric density, by changing impact angle, and by comparing the ejecta run-out distances with first-order models of turbidity flows. Three distinct ejecta emplacement processes can be characterized. Ejecta ramparts result from coarser clasts sorted and driven outward by vortical winds behind the outward moving ejecta curtain. This style of “wind-modified” emplacement represents minimal ejecta entrainment and is enhanced by a bimodal size distribution in the ejecta. Such “eddy-supported flows” are observed to increase in run-out distance (scaled to crater size) with increasing atmospheric pressure. By analogy with turbidity flows, this scaled distance should increase as R1/2 for a given atmospheric pressure and degree of entrainment. Ejecta flows with much greater run-out distances develop as the turbulent power in atmospheric response winds increase. Such flows overrun and scour the inner ejecta facies, thereby producing distinct inner and outer facies. The degree of ejecta entrainment depends on the dimensionless ratio of drag to gravity forces acting on individual ejecta and the intensity of the winds created by the outward moving curtain. Entrainment increases with increasing atmospheric density and ejection velocity (crater size) but decreases with ejecta density and size. The intensity of curtain-generated winds increases with ejection velocity (crater size). The dimensionless drag ratio characterizing the laboratory experiments can be applied to Mars since the reduced atmospheric density is offset by the increased ejection velocities for kilometer-scale events. For a given crater size (ejection velocity) and atmospheric conditions, a wide range of nonballistic ejecta emplacement styles could occur simply by varying ejecta sizes even without the presence of water. Alternatively, the onset crater diameter for nonballistic emplacement styles can reflect the range of ejecta sizes possible from the diverse martian geologic history (massive basalts to fine-grained aeolian deposits). Scaling considerations further predict that ejecta run-out distances scaled to crater size on Mars should increase as R1/2; hence long run-out flows dependent on crater diameter need not reflect depth to a buried reservoir of water. On Venus, however, the dense atmosphere maximizes entrainment and results in ejecta flow densities approaching a constant fraction of the atmospheric density. Under such conditions, ejecta run-out distances should decrease as R−1/2.

[1]  Geoffrey Ingram Taylor,et al.  The formation of a blast wave by a very intense explosion. - II. The atomic explosion of 1945 , 1950, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[2]  H. Langhaar Dimensional analysis and theory of models , 1951 .

[3]  R. Bagnold Auto-suspension of transported sediment; turbidity currents , 1962, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[4]  E. Shoemaker Interpretation of Lunar Craters , 1962 .

[5]  Zdeněk Kopal,et al.  Physics and Astronomy of the Moon , 1962 .

[6]  A. Sherwood Effect of air drag on particles ejected during explosive cratering , 1967 .

[7]  D. Gault,et al.  Impact cratering mechanics and structures , 1968 .

[8]  R. Herr Effects of the atmospheric-lithostatic pres sure ratio on explosive craters in dry soil , 1971 .

[9]  M. Hampton,et al.  The Role of Subaqueous Debris Flow in Generating Turbidity Currents , 1972 .

[10]  James W. Head,et al.  Radial thickness variation in impact crater ejecta - Implications for lunar basin deposits , 1973 .

[11]  M. Malin,et al.  Polar Wandering on Mars? , 1973, Science.

[12]  D. Gault,et al.  Some comparisons of impact craters on Mercury and the Moon , 1975 .

[13]  D. Gault,et al.  On the origin of the lunar smooth-plains , 1975 .

[14]  V. Oberbeck The Role of Ballistic Erosion and Sedimentation in Lunar Stratigraphy , 1975 .

[15]  A. Chabai Influence of Gravitational Fields and Atmospheric Pressures on Scaling of Explosion Craters , 1976 .

[16]  H. Brode,et al.  The theory of cratering phenomena, an overview. , 1977 .

[17]  Experimental hypervelocity impact into quartz sand. II - Effects of gravitational acceleration , 1977 .

[18]  D. Shockey,et al.  Mechanisms and models of cratering in earth media , 1977 .

[19]  R. M. Henry,et al.  Meteorological results from the surface of Mars: Viking 1 and 2 , 1977 .

[20]  H. Cooper A summary of explosion cratering phenomena relevant to meteor impact events , 1977 .

[21]  R. Greeley,et al.  Martian impact craters and emplacement of ejecta by surface flow , 1977 .

[22]  D. Gault,et al.  Exploratory experiments of impact craters formed in viscous-liquid targets: Analogs for Martian rampart craters? , 1978 .

[23]  P. Schultz,et al.  Orbital infrared observations of lunar craters and possible implications for impact ejecta emplacement , 1978 .

[24]  D. Gault,et al.  Experimental studies of oblique impact. , 1978 .

[25]  Malcolm Mellor,et al.  Dynamics of Snow Avalanches , 1978 .

[26]  D. Gault,et al.  Atmospheric effects on Martian ejecta emplacement , 1979 .

[27]  R. Arvidson,et al.  Differential aeolian redistribution rates on Mars , 1979, Nature.

[28]  P. Mouginis-Mark Martian fluidized crater morphology: Variations with crater size, latitude, altitude, and target material , 1979 .

[29]  H. M. Pantin Interaction between velocity and effective density in turbidity flow: Phase-plane analysis, with criteria for autosuspension , 1979 .

[30]  P. Schultz,et al.  Secondary Impact Craters around Lunar, Mercurian, and Martian Craters , 1980 .

[31]  D. Gault,et al.  Impact cratering in viscous targets - Laboratory experiments , 1980 .

[32]  L. W. Alvarez,et al.  Extraterrestrial Cause for the Cretaceous-Tertiary Extinction , 1980, Science.

[33]  R. Grieve Impact cratering , 1981, Nature.

[34]  H. Melosh Atmospheric Breakup of Terrestrial Impactors , 1981 .

[35]  T. Ahrens,et al.  The interaction of the Cretaceous/Tertiary Extinction Bolide with the atmosphere, ocean, and solid Earth , 1981 .

[36]  K. A. Holsapple,et al.  On the Scaling of Crater Dimensions 2. Impact Processes , 1982 .

[37]  Ronald Greeley,et al.  Pedestal craters on Ganymede , 1982 .

[38]  D. Gault,et al.  Impact ejecta dynamics in an atmosphere: Experimental results and extrapolations , 1982 .

[39]  H. Melosh The mechanics of large meteoroid impacts in the Earth’s oceans , 1982 .

[40]  E. M. Jones,et al.  Atmospheric effects of large body impacts: The first few minutes , 1982 .

[41]  P. Schultz,et al.  Geological implications of impacts of large asteroids and comets on the earth , 1982 .

[42]  A. Singer The Effect of an Impact-Generated Gas Cloud on the Acceleration of Solid Ejecta , 1983 .

[43]  K. Holsapple,et al.  Crater ejecta scaling laws - Fundamental forms based on dimensional analysis , 1983 .

[44]  K. Wohletz,et al.  Martian rampart crater ejecta - Experiments and analysis of melt-water interaction , 1983 .

[45]  Ronald Greeley,et al.  Wind as a geological process: Wind as a geological process , 1985 .

[46]  F. Fanale,et al.  Global distribution and migration of subsurface ice on mars , 1985 .

[47]  D. Gault,et al.  Clustered impacts: Experiments and implications , 1985 .

[48]  A. Basilevsky,et al.  Impact craters of Venus: Analysis of Venera 15 and 16 data , 1986 .

[49]  A. Vickery Effect of an impact-generated gas cloud on the acceleration of solid ejecta. [meteorites from Mars , 1986 .

[50]  J. Hails Wind as a geological processR. Greeley and J.D. Iversen, 1985. Cambridge Planetary Science Series, 333 pp. 1985. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, xii + 333 pp., £stg. 35.00, US $59.50 (hard cover) , 1987 .

[51]  P. Schultz Crater ejecta morphology and the presence of water on Mars , 1987 .

[52]  R. Greeley,et al.  MECA symposium on Mars: Evolution of its climate and atmosphere , 1987 .

[53]  P. Schultz Impact Vaporization of Volatile-rich Targets; Experimental Results and Implications , 1988 .

[54]  Peter H. Schultz,et al.  Polar wandering of Mars , 1988 .

[55]  D. Gault,et al.  Prolonged global catastrophes from oblique impacts , 1990 .

[56]  P. Schultz Evidence for Atmospheric Effects on Martian Crater Shape , 1990 .

[57]  K. Keil,et al.  The formation of the Ries Crater, West Germany; Evidence of atmospheric interactions during a larger cratering event , 1990 .

[58]  J. A. Grant,et al.  Gradational epochs on Mars: Evidence from West-Northwest of Isidis Basin and Electris , 1990 .

[59]  P. Schultz Atmospheric effects on cratering efficiency , 1992 .