Vanadium redox flow battery with slotted porous electrodes and automatic rebalancing demonstrated on a 1 kW system level

Abstract Capacity loss due to electrolyte crossover through the membrane and pump losses due to pressure drop at the porous electrodes are widely known issues in vanadium redox flow batteries during operation. In commercial systems, these losses account for a significant reduction in the overall efficiency. Previous studies have been focused on the development of new membranes to solve the capacity loss, and design modification to reduce the pressure drop. In this work, we propose unique solutions to solve both problems and are demonstrated in a multi-cell stack for the first time. A 20-cell, 1 kW vanadium redox flow battery stack was assembled using thin bipolar plates and porous electrodes featuring interdigitated flow channels. Such a stack design is novel of its kind and can mitigate various problems associated with flow distribution and pump power in flow batteries. In addition, the electrolyte tanks were shunted together to rebalance the electrolyte automatically. The stack showed a very good and stable performance with an energy efficiency of 80.5% at a current density of 80 mA cm−2. The use of hydraulic shunt resulted in a constant capacity over 250 cycles while the use of flow channels on the porous electrodes resulted in ∼40% reduction in pressure drop, compared to a stack with standard felts. The reduction in pressure drop by employing flow channels reduced the pump power proportionally. Overall, capacity retention and utilization of active materials have been improved substantially. These methods are simple and applicable to any size of vanadium redox flow battery.

[1]  A. Whitehead,et al.  Investigation of a method to hinder charge imbalance in the vanadium redox flow battery , 2013 .

[2]  A. Arpornwichanop,et al.  Study on Mechanism and Kinetic of Air Oxidation of V(II) in Electrolyte Reservoir of a Vanadium Redox Flow Battery , 2014 .

[3]  Piergiorgio Alotto,et al.  Redox flow batteries for the storage of renewable energy: A review , 2014 .

[4]  Peter Pokorny,et al.  Critical safety features of the vanadium redox flow battery , 2017 .

[5]  Bin Li,et al.  Capacity decay and remediation of nafion-based all-vanadium redox flow batteries. , 2013, ChemSusChem.

[6]  Hee‐Tak Kim,et al.  In-situ observation of the degradation of all-vanadium redox flow batteries with dynamic hydrogen reference electrode under real operation conditions , 2019, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry.

[7]  D. Park,et al.  Performance of the all-vanadium redox flow battery stack , 2017 .

[8]  Wen-Yen Hsieh,et al.  Measurement of local current density of all-vanadium redox flow batteries , 2014 .

[9]  Tao Wang,et al.  Dynamic Flow Rate Control for Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries , 2017 .

[10]  Zhongbao Wei,et al.  Real-time monitoring of capacity loss for vanadium redox flow battery , 2018, Journal of Power Sources.

[11]  J. Park,et al.  Capacity Decay Mitigation by Asymmetric Positive/Negative Electrolyte Volumes in Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries. , 2016, ChemSusChem.

[12]  S. Jayanti,et al.  Effect of flow field on the performance of an all-vanadium redox flow battery , 2016 .

[13]  G. Soloveichik Flow Batteries: Current Status and Trends. , 2015, Chemical reviews.

[14]  Zhiguo Qu,et al.  Numerical study on vanadium redox flow battery performance with non-uniformly compressed electrode and serpentine flow field , 2018, Applied Energy.

[15]  Xuelong Zhou,et al.  Critical transport issues for improving the performance of aqueous redox flow batteries , 2017 .

[16]  C. R. Dennison,et al.  Reducing capacity fade in vanadium redox flow batteries by altering charging and discharging currents , 2014 .

[17]  P. Lee,et al.  Numerical study of fluid flow in different manifold configurations for vanadium redox flow battery , 2017, 2017 16th IEEE Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (ITherm).

[18]  J. Alexander,et al.  Rechargeable redox flow batteries: flow fields, stacks and design considerations. , 2018, Chemical Society reviews.

[19]  Tuti Mariana Lim,et al.  Recent Advancements in All‐Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries , 2016 .

[20]  Nyunt Wai,et al.  Study of flow behavior in all-vanadium redox flow battery using spatially resolved voltage distribution , 2017 .

[21]  Nyunt Wai,et al.  Advanced porous electrodes with flow channels for vanadium redox flow battery , 2017 .

[22]  Xinping Qiu,et al.  Reduction of capacity decay in vanadium flow batteries by an electrolyte-reflow method , 2017 .

[23]  Qinghua Liu,et al.  Dramatic performance gains in vanadium redox flow batteries through modified cell architecture , 2012 .

[24]  Menglian Zheng,et al.  Dynamic control strategy for the electrolyte flow rate of vanadium redox flow batteries , 2017, Applied Energy.

[25]  M. Mench,et al.  In Situ Localized Current Distribution Measurements in All-Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries , 2016 .

[26]  Meihong Wang,et al.  Energy storage technologies and real life applications – A state of the art review , 2016 .

[27]  Jingyu Xi,et al.  The benefits and limitations of electrolyte mixing in vanadium flow batteries , 2017 .

[28]  Brian J. Koeppel,et al.  Performance of a low cost interdigitated flow design on a 1 kW class all vanadium mixed acid redox flow battery , 2016 .

[29]  Alasdair J. Crawford,et al.  1 kW/1 kWh advanced vanadium redox flow battery utilizing mixed acid electrolytes , 2013 .

[30]  Mike L. Perry,et al.  The Influence of Electrode and Channel Configurations on Flow Battery Performance , 2014 .

[31]  Qian Xu,et al.  Numerical investigations of flow field designs for vanadium redox flow batteries , 2013 .

[32]  Q. Yan,et al.  A comprehensive study of electrode compression effects in all vanadium redox flow batteries including locally resolved measurements , 2018, Applied Energy.