Opinions within Media, Power and Gossip

Despite the increasing diffusion of the Internet technology, TV remains the principal medium of communication. People's perceptions, knowledge, beliefs and opinions about matter of facts get (in)formed through the information reported on by the mass-media. However, a single source of information (and consensus) could be a potential cause of anomalies in the structure and evolution of a society. Hence, as the information available (and the way it is reported) is fundamental for our perceptions and opinions, the definition of conditions allowing for a good information to be disseminated is a pressing challenge. In this paper starting from a report on the last Italian political campaign in 2008, we derive a socio-cognitive computational model of opinion dynamics where agents get informed by different sources of information. Then, a what-if analysis, performed trough simulations on the model's parameters space, is shown. In particular, the scenario implemented includes three main streams of information acquisition, differing in both the contents and the perceived reliability of the messages spread. Agents' internal opinion is updated either by accessing one of the information sources, namely media and experts, or by exchanging information with one another. They are also endowed with cognitive mechanisms to accept, reject or partially consider the acquired information.

[1]  Walter Quattrociocchi,et al.  Dynamic Monopolies in Colored Tori , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing Workshops and Phd Forum.

[2]  Torsten Eymann,et al.  On the effects of reputation in the Internet of Services , 2009 .

[3]  Walter Quattrociocchi,et al.  Selection in scientific networks , 2010, Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[4]  George A. Akerlof,et al.  The Market for `Lemons , 1970 .

[5]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[6]  Jan Lorenz,et al.  Continuous opinion dynamics of multidimensional allocation problems under bounded confidence: More dimensions lead to better chances for consensus , 2007, 0708.2923.

[7]  J. Deighton,et al.  Marketing and Seduction: Building Exchange Relationships by Managing Social Consensus , 1995 .

[8]  Walter Quattrociocchi,et al.  Multicolored Dynamos on Toroidal Meshes , 2010, ArXiv.

[9]  Walter Quattrociocchi,et al.  Emergence through Selection: The Evolution of a Scientific Challenge , 2011, ArXiv.

[10]  L. Festinger.  Social pressures in informal groups : a study of human factors in housing / by Leon Festinger, Stanley Schachter and Kurt Back , 1950 .

[11]  Muzafer Sherif,et al.  The Robbers Cave experiment : intergroup conflict and cooperation , 1988 .

[12]  Dirk A. Lorenz,et al.  On Conditions for Convergence to Consensus , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[13]  T. Rai,et al.  Cultural Evolution , 2018, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology.

[14]  Nicola Santoro,et al.  Time-Varying Graphs and Social Network Analysis: Temporal Indicators and Metrics , 2011, ArXiv.

[15]  M. McCombs.  Agenda setting function of mass media , 1977 .

[16]  S. Asch.  Opinions and Social Pressure , 1955, Nature.

[17]  Serge Galam,et al.  SOCIOPHYSICS: A REVIEW OF GALAM MODELS , 2008, 0803.1800.

[18]  Torsten Eymann,et al.  Social knowledge for eGovernance: Theory and technology of reputation , 2009 .

[19]  Xiaofan Wang,et al.  Discrete opinion dynamics on networks based on social influence , 2009 .

[20]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Situating Social Influence Processes: Dynamic, Multidirectional Flows of Influence Within Social Networks , 2007, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[21]  Maxim J. Schlossberg,et al.  A Cognitive Psychology of Mass Communication. , 1990 .

[22]  B. Latané,et al.  From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. , 1990 .

[23]  Gerardo Iñiguez,et al.  Opinion and community formation in coevolving networks. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[24]  George A. Akerlof.  The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism , 1970 .

[25]  Haijun Zhou,et al.  Dynamics-driven evolution to structural heterogeneity in complex networks , 2008, 0804.3181.

[26]  Dietrich Stauffer.  Opinion Dynamics and Sociophysics , 2009, Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science.

[27]  Mario Paolucci,et al.  On the effects of informational cheating on social evaluations: image and reputation through gossip , 2009, Int. J. Knowl. Learn..

[28]  Mario Paolucci,et al.  Image and Reputation Coping Differently with Massive Informational Cheating , 2009, WSKS.

[29]  Nicola Santoro,et al.  Time-varying graphs and dynamic networks , 2010, Int. J. Parallel Emergent Distributed Syst..

[30]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Mixing beliefs among interacting agents , 2000, Adv. Complex Syst..

[31]  Christopher M. Hoadley,et al.  Between information and communication: middle spaces in computer media for learning , 1999, CSCL.

[32]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[33]  D. Shaw,et al.  Agenda setting function of mass media , 1972 .

[34]  Walter Quattrociocchi,et al.  Simulating opinion dynamics in heterogeneous communication systems , 2010 .

[35]  Mario Paolucci,et al.  Reputation and Uncertainty Reduction: Simulating Partner Selection , 2008, AAMAS-TRUST.