Neural sensitivity to human voices: ERP evidence of task and attentional influences.

In an earlier study, we found that human voices evoked a positive event-related potential (ERP) peaking at approximately 320 ms after stimulus onset, distinctive from those elicited by instrumental tones. Here we show that though similar in latency to the Novelty P3, this Voice-Sensitive Response (VSR) differs in antecedent conditions and scalp distribution. Furthermore, when participants were not attending to stimuli, the response to voices was undistinguished from other harmonic stimuli (strings, winds, and brass). During a task requiring attending to a feature other than timbre, voices were not distinguished from voicelike stimuli (strings), but were distinguished from other harmonic stimuli. We suggest that the component elicited by voices and similar sounds reflects the allocation of attention on the basis of stimulus significance (as opposed to novelty), and propose an explanation of the task and attentional factors that contribute to the effect.

[1]  J. Polich,et al.  P3a, perceptual distinctiveness, and stimulus modality. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[2]  I. Winkler,et al.  Two separate codes for missing-fundamental pitch in the human auditory cortex. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  D. Woods.  The component structure of the N1 wave of the human auditory evoked potential. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[4]  J Kreiman,et al.  Voice perception deficits: neuroanatomical correlates of phonagnosia. , 1989, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[5]  S. Scott,et al.  Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  W. V. Dommelen.  Acoustic parameters in human speaker recognition. , 1990 .

[7]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Processing of novel sounds and frequency changes in the human auditory cortex: magnetoencephalographic recordings. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[8]  R. Zatorre,et al.  ‘What’, ‘where’ and ‘how’ in auditory cortex , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  N. Squires,et al.  Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  Processing of complex sounds in the macaque nonprimary auditory cortex. , 1995, Science.

[11]  T. Picton,et al.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[12]  David Friedman,et al.  Effect of Sound Familiarity on the Event-Related Potentials Elicited by Novel Environmental Sounds , 1998, Brain and Cognition.

[13]  E. Donchin,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of the late ERP responses to deviant stimuli. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[14]  E. Courchesne,et al.  Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  G. Karmos,et al.  Perspectives of Event-Related Potentials Research , 1995 .

[16]  S. Bentin,et al.  Processing specificity for human voice stimuli: electrophysiological evidence , 2001, Neuroreport.

[17]  X. Wang,et al.  On cortical coding of vocal communication sounds in primates. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  A. Askenfelt.  Voices and strings: Close cousins or not? , 1991 .

[19]  R. Knight,et al.  P300 generation by novel somatosensory stimuli. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  J. Polich,et al.  P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[21]  R. Knight,et al.  Effects of temporal-parietal lesions on the somatosensory P3 to lower limb stimulation. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  E. N. Solokov.  Perception and the conditioned reflex , 1963 .

[23]  D. Lancker,et al.  Voice discrimination and recognition are separate abilities , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  Kim E. A. Silverman,et al.  Evidence for the independent function of intonation contour type, voice quality, and F0 range in signaling speaker affect , 1985 .

[25]  E Courchesne,et al.  Effects of rare non-target stimuli on brain electrophysiological activity and performance. , 1990, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[26]  O. S. Marin,et al.  Neurological Aspects of Music Perception and Performance , 1999 .

[27]  R. Näätänen.  Attention and brain function , 1992 .

[28]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses , 1997, Nature.

[29]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Voice-selective areas in human auditory cortex , 2000, Nature.

[30]  R. Knight,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Involuntary Attention to Acoustic Novelty and Change , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  M Huotilainen,et al.  From objective to subjective: pitch representation in the human auditory cortex. , 1995, Neuroreport.

[32]  D. Woods,et al.  Auditory selective attention in middle-aged and elderly subjects: an event-related brain potential study. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[33]  M Huotilainen,et al.  Harmonic partials facilitate pitch discrimination in humans: electrophysiological and behavioral evidence , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[34]  I. Winkler,et al.  Involuntary Attention and Distractibility as Evaluated with Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2000, Audiology and Neurotology.

[35]  A. Liberman,et al.  On the Immediacy of Phonetic Perception , 1997 .

[36]  M. Fabiani,et al.  Changes in brain activity patterns in aging: the novelty oddball. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[37]  E. T. Possing,et al.  Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[38]  R. K. Simpson.  Nature Neuroscience , 2022 .

[39]  Christine Chiarello,et al.  Varieties of Interhemispheric Inhibition, or How to Keep a Good Hemisphere Down , 1996, Brain and Cognition.

[40]  D. Friedman,et al.  The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[41]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Auditory distraction: event-related potential and behavioral indices , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.