Discrimination between tasks with user activity patterns during information search

Can the activity patterns of page use during information search sessions discriminate between different types of information seeking tasks? We model sequences of interactions with search result and content pages during information search sessions. Two representations are created: the sequences of page use and a cognitive representation of page interactions. The cognitive representation is based on logged eye movement patterns of textual information acquisition via the reading process. Page sequence actions from task sessions (n=109) in a user study are analyzed. The study tasks differed from one another in basic dimensions of complexity, specificity,level, and the type of information product (intellectual or factual). The results show that differences in task types can be measured at both the level of observations of page type sequences and at the level of cognitive activity on the pages. We discuss the implications for personalization of search systems, measurement of task similarity and the development of user-centered information systems that can support the user's current and expected search intentions.

[1]  Jacek Gwizdka,et al.  Task and user effects on reading patterns in information search , 2011, Interact. Comput..

[2]  Shuguang Han,et al.  Automatic Detection of Search Tactic in Individual Information Seeking: A Hidden Markov Model Approach , 2013, ArXiv.

[3]  D. Balota,et al.  Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  Carolyn Watters,et al.  A field study characterizing Web-based information-seeking tasks , 2007 .

[5]  Liwen Qiu,et al.  Markov Models of Search State Patterns in a Hypertext Information Retrieval System , 1993, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[6]  Jacek Gwizdka,et al.  Inferring user knowledge level from eye movement patterns , 2013, Inf. Process. Manag..

[7]  Ryen W. White,et al.  A study on the effects of personalization and task information on implicit feedback performance , 2006, CIKM '06.

[8]  K. Rayner,et al.  Examining the Word Identification Stages Hypothesized by the E-Z Reader Model , 2006, Psychological science.

[9]  Tie-Yan Liu,et al.  Page importance computation based on Markov processes , 2011, Information Retrieval.

[10]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Eye movements, word familiarity, and vocabulary acquisition , 2004 .

[12]  Yuelin Li,et al.  Relationships among work tasks, search tasks, and interactive information searching behavior , 2008 .

[13]  Yuelin Li.  Exploring the relationships between work task and search task in information search , 2009 .

[14]  Jacek Gwizdka,et al.  What Can Searching Behavior Tell Us About the Difficulty of Information Tasks? A Study of Web Navigation , 2007, ASIST.

[15]  Zhi-Ming Ma,et al.  Web Markov skeleton processes and their applications , 2011 .

[16]  Michael Gertz,et al.  On the value of temporal information in information retrieval , 2007, SIGF.

[17]  Gary Marchionini.  Information-seeking strategies of novices using a full-text electronic encyclopedia , 1989 .

[18]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[20]  D. Ballard,et al.  What you see is what you need. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[21]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: investigating the subordinate-bias effect. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Jacek Gwizdka,et al.  Dynamic assessment of information acquisition effort during interactive search , 2011, ASIST.

[23]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  The roles of digital libraries in teaching and learning , 1995, CACM.

[24]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  E–Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading , 2006, Cognitive Systems Research.

[25]  Jacek Gwizdka,et al.  A User-Centered Experiment and Logging Framework for Interactive Information Retrieval , 2009, UIIR@SIGIR.

[26]  Andreas Dengel,et al.  Query expansion using gaze-based feedback on the subdocument level , 2008, SIGIR '08.

[27]  R. C. Katz.  Book Review: The Positive Psychology of Buddhism and Yoga: Paths to Mature Happiness. By Marvin Levine. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2000 , 2000 .

[28]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Segmental Analysis and Evaluation of User Focused Search Process , 2013, 2013 12th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications.

[29]  A. Inhoff,et al.  The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Pia Borlund,et al.  The IIR evaluation model: a framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems , 2003, Inf. Res..

[31]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye Movements as Reflections of Comprehension Processes in Reading , 2006 .