Impact of Information Feedback in Continuous Combinatorial Auctions: An Experimental Study of Economic Performance

Advancements in information technology offer opportunities for designing and deploying innovative market mechanisms that can improve the allocation and procurement processes of businesses. For example, combinatorial auctions--in which bidders can bid on combinations of goods--have been shown to increase the economic efficiency of a trade when goods have complementarities. However, the lack of real-time decision support tools for bidders has prevented this mechanism from reaching its full potential. With the objective of facilitating bidder participation in combinatorial auctions, this study, using recent research in real-time bidder support metrics, discusses several novel feedback schemes that can aid bidders in formulating combinatorial bids in real-time. The feedback schemes allow us to conduct continuous combinatorial auctions, where bidders can submit bids at any time. Using laboratory experiments with two different setups, we compare the economic performance of the continuous mechanism under three progressively advanced levels of feedback. Our findings indicate that information feedback plays a major role in influencing the economic outcomes of combinatorial auctions. We compare several important bid characteristics to explain the observed differences in aggregate measures. This study advances the ongoing research on combinatorial auctions by developing continuous auctions that differentiate themselves from earlier combinatorial auction mechanisms by facilitating free-flowing participation of bidders and providing exact prices of bundles on demand in real time. For practitioners, the study provides insights on how the nature of feedback can influence the economic outcomes of a complex trading mechanism.

[1]  Ronald M. Harstad,et al.  Computationally Manageable Combinational Auctions , 1998 .

[2]  A. Kluger,et al.  The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. , 1996 .

[3]  อนิรุธ สืบสิงห์,et al.  Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques , 2014 .

[4]  R. Brent Gallupe,et al.  Information Overload: Addressing the Productivity Paradox in Face-to-Face Electronic Meetings , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  B. Brehmer In one word: Not from experience. , 1980 .

[6]  Vernon L. Smith,et al.  REWARDS, EXPERIENCE AND DECISION COSTS IN FIRST PRICE AUCTIONS , 1993 .

[7]  C. O'Reilly Individuals and Information Overload in Organizations: Is More Necessarily Better? , 1980 .

[8]  Jeffrey E. Danes,et al.  Social Judgment Theory , 1984 .

[9]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  An Experimental Test of Flexible Combinatorial Spectrum Auction Formats , 2010 .

[10]  E. Maasland,et al.  Auction Theory , 2021, Springer Texts in Business and Economics.

[11]  Christopher George Caplice,et al.  An optimization based bidding process : a new framework for shipper-carrier relationships , 1996 .

[12]  R. Isaac,et al.  Robustness of the Incentive Compatible Combinatorial Auction , 2000 .

[13]  C. Plott,et al.  A BINARY CONFLICT ASCENDING PRICE (BICAP) MECHANISM FOR THE DECENTRALIZED ALLOCATION OF THE RIGHT TO USE RAILROAD TRACKS. , 1996 .

[14]  P. Cramton,et al.  Introduction to Combinatorial Auctions , 2006 .

[15]  Avid,et al.  Experiments Testing Multiobject Allocation Mechanisms , 2003 .

[16]  J. Banks,et al.  Allocating uncertain and unresponsive resources: an experimental approach. , 1989, The Rand journal of economics.

[17]  Sven de Vries,et al.  Combinatorial Auctions: A Survey , 2003, INFORMS J. Comput..

[18]  David Bawden,et al.  Perspectives on information overload , 1999 .

[19]  David C. Parkes,et al.  iBundle: an efficient ascending price bundle auction , 1999, EC '99.

[20]  Daniel Friedman,et al.  Experimental Methods: A Primer for Economists , 1994 .

[21]  N. Malhotra Information Load and Consumer Decision Making , 1982 .

[22]  John H. Kagel,et al.  Implementing efficient multi-object auction institutions: An experimental study of the performance of boundedly rational agents , 2009, Games Econ. Behav..

[23]  D. Hausch,et al.  Multi-object auctions: sequential vs. simultaneous sales , 1986 .

[24]  V. Smith,et al.  Papers in Experimental Economics: Theory and Behavior of Single Object Auctions , 1982 .

[25]  M. Doherty,et al.  Effects of cognitive feedback on performance. , 1989 .

[26]  David V. Budescu,et al.  The Effect of Payoff Feedback and Information Pooling on Reasoning Errors: Evidence from Experimental Markets , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Karim Jamal,et al.  Money vs gaming: Effects of salient monetary payments in double oral auctions , 1991 .

[28]  D. Porter The effect of bid withdrawal in a multi-object auction , 1999 .

[29]  V. Smith Papers in experimental economics , 1991 .

[30]  Anthony M. Kwasnica,et al.  A New and Improved Design for Multiobject Iterative Auctions , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[31]  Ronald M. Harstad,et al.  Information Impact and Allocation Rules in Auctions with Affiliated Private Values: A Laboratory Study , 1987 .

[32]  Stephen J. Rassenti,et al.  Theory, experiment and the federal communications commission spectrum auctions , 2003 .

[33]  S. Rassenti,et al.  A Combinatorial Auction Mechanism for Airport Time Slot Allocation , 1982 .

[34]  Lawrence M. Ausubel,et al.  The Clock-Proxy Auction: A Practical Combinatorial Auction Design , 2004 .

[35]  Ramayya Krishnan,et al.  Effects of Information-Revelation Policies Under Market-Structure Uncertainty , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[36]  Jacob K. Goeree,et al.  Hierarchical package bidding: A paper & pencil combinatorial auction , 2010, Games Econ. Behav..

[37]  David J. Groggel,et al.  Practical Nonparametric Statistics , 2000, Technometrics.

[38]  T. R. Stewart,et al.  10 – SOCIAL JUDGMENT THEORY , 1975 .

[39]  R. McAfee,et al.  Analyzing the Airwaves Auction , 1996 .

[40]  Arne Andersson,et al.  Integer programming for combinatorial auction winner determination , 2000, Proceedings Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems.

[41]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .

[42]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[43]  Johanna Helena Kerstholt,et al.  Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn , 1991 .

[44]  Joseph A. Swanson,et al.  Special Issue: Experimental Economics in Practice: The First Use of a Combined-Value Auction for Transportation Services , 2002, Interfaces.

[45]  Eric van Heck,et al.  Information Architecture and Electronic Market Performance in Multidimensional Auctions , 2002 .

[46]  David Porter,et al.  Combinatorial auction design , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  Alok Gupta,et al.  Toward Comprehensive Real-Time Bidder Support in Iterative Combinatorial Auctions , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[48]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Learning from feedback: exactingness and incentives. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[49]  Alok Gupta,et al.  Analysis and Design of Business - to - Consumer Online Auctions , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[50]  Mark M. Bykowsky,et al.  Mutually Destructive Bidding: The FCC Auction Design Problem , 2000 .

[51]  Timothy C. Salmon,et al.  A Theory of Jump Bidding in Ascending Auctions , 2004 .

[52]  K. Sengupta,et al.  Alternative conceptions of feedback in dynamic decision environments: an experimental investigation , 1993 .

[53]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Multidimensional functional learning (MFL) and some new conceptions of feedback , 1981 .

[54]  M. Kaplan,et al.  Human judgment and decision processes , 1975 .

[55]  A. M. Harrell,et al.  THE EFFECT OF INFORMATION LOAD ON DECISION MAKERS' CUE UTILIZATION LEVELS AND DECISION QUALITY IN... , 1990 .

[56]  Gabriel Y. Weintraub,et al.  A Combinational Auction Improves School Meals in Chile , 2002, Interfaces.