Transforming the stakeholders’ Big Data for intellectual capital management

Purpose This paper aims to define a conceptual framework for transforming Big Data into organizational value by focussing on the perspectives of service science and activity theory. In coherence with the agenda on evolutionary research on intellectual capital (IC), the study also provides momentum for researchers and scholars to explore emerging trends and implications of Big Data for IC management. Design/methodology/approach The paper adopts a qualitative and integrated research method based on a constructive review of existing literature related to IC management, Big Data, service science and activity theory to identify features and processes of a conceptual framework emerging at the intersection of previously identified research topics. Findings The proposed framework harnesses the power of Big Data, collectively created by the engagement of multiple stakeholders based on the concepts of service ecosystems, by using activity theory. The transformation of Big Data for IC management addresses the process of value creation based on a set of critical dimensions useful to identify goals, main actors and stakeholders, processes and motivations. Research limitations/implications The paper indicates how organizational values can be created from Big Data through the co-creation of value in service ecosystems. Activity theory is used as theoretical lens to support IC ecosystem development. This research is exploratory; the framework offers opportunities for refinement and can be used to spearhead directions for future research. Practical implications The paper proposes a framework for transforming Big Data into organizational values for IC management in the context of entrepreneurial universities as pivotal contexts of observation that can be replicated in different fields. The framework provides guidelines that can be used to help organizations intending to embark on the emerging paradigm of Big Data for IC management for their competitive advantages. Originality/value The paper’s originality is in bringing together research from Big Data, value co-creation from service ecosystems and activity theory to address the complex issues involved in IC management. A further element of originality offered involves integrating such multidisciplinary perspectives as a lens for shaping the complex process of value creation from Big Data in relationship to IC management. The concept of how IC ecosystems can be designed is also introduced.

[1]  Rachel Schutt,et al.  Doing Data Science , 2013 .

[2]  N. B. Anuar,et al.  The rise of "big data" on cloud computing: Review and open research issues , 2015, Inf. Syst..

[3]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing , 2004 .

[4]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  The service system is the basic abstraction of service science , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[5]  Murtaza Haider,et al.  Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics , 2015, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[6]  Robert W. Palmatier Editorial: the past, present, and future of JAMS , 2016 .

[7]  J. Manyika Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity , 2011 .

[8]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic , 2016 .

[9]  G. Schiuma,et al.  Intellectual capital assessment practices: overview and managerial implications , 2013 .

[10]  E. Borin,et al.  Unlocking the potential of IC in Italian cultural ecosystems , 2015 .

[11]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  From goods to service(s): Divergences and convergences of logics , 2008 .

[12]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  It's all B2B…and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market , 2011 .

[13]  Aurelio Tommasetti,et al.  Decision-Making in Smart Service Systems: A Viable Systems Approach Contribution to Service Science Advances , 2016, IESS.

[14]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Big data: the management revolution. , 2012, Harvard business review.

[15]  John Dumay,et al.  Guest editorial : The third stage of IC : towards a new IC future and beyond , 2013 .

[16]  Nils Urbach,et al.  Think Big with Big Data: Identifying Suitable Big Data Strategies in Corporate Environments , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[17]  J. Mouritsen Reporting Intellectual Capital to Augment Research, Development and Innovation in SME's: Report to the Commission of the High Level Expert Group on RICARDIS , 2006 .

[18]  John Dumay,et al.  15 years of the Journal of Intellectual Capital and counting : a manifesto for transformational IC research , 2014 .

[19]  Giovanni Mastroleo,et al.  Measuring intellectual capital in the university sector using a fuzzy logic expert system , 2014 .

[20]  G. Secundo,et al.  Intellectual capital in the age of Big Data: establishing a research agenda , 2017 .

[21]  D. Boyd,et al.  CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA , 2012 .

[22]  Andy Neely,et al.  Intellectual capital - defining key performance indicators for organizational knowledge assets , 2004, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[23]  Robert W. Palmatier,et al.  Resource-based theory in marketing , 2014 .

[24]  Y. Engeström Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. , 2001 .

[25]  Benjamin W. Wah,et al.  Significance and Challenges of Big Data Research , 2015, Big Data Res..

[26]  Giuseppina Passiante,et al.  The innovation ecosystem as booster for the innovative entrepreneurship in the smart specialisation strategy , 2014 .

[27]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research , 2014 .

[28]  N. Bontis Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models , 1998 .

[29]  Mark Lycett,et al.  ‘Datafication’: making sense of (big) data in a complex world , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Giustina Secundo,et al.  Creating value from Social Big Data: Implications for Smart Tourism Destinations , 2017, Inf. Process. Manag..

[31]  G. Secundo,et al.  Managing intellectual capital through a collective intelligence approach: An integrated framework for universities , 2016 .

[32]  D. Urbano,et al.  The development of an entrepreneurial university , 2012 .

[33]  G. Elia,et al.  A performance measurement system for academic entrepreneurship: a case study , 2014 .

[34]  M. Bunge Mind and Society , 2010 .

[35]  Lorna Uden,et al.  Activity theory for designing mobile learning , 2007, Int. J. Mob. Learn. Organisation.

[36]  Kaj Storbacka,et al.  Practices as Markets: Value Co-Creation in E-Invoicing , 2010 .

[37]  Jignesh M. Patel,et al.  Big data and its technical challenges , 2014, CACM.

[38]  Liliana L. Bove,et al.  Linking Service-Dominant Logic and Strategic Business Practice , 2012 .

[39]  Giovanni Schiuma,et al.  Knowledge, learning, and innovation: research and perspectives , 2013, J. Knowl. Manag..

[40]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[41]  Linus Nilsson,et al.  Continuous Authentication Using Behavioral Biometrics , 2013, IT Professional.

[42]  Xiaohang Wu,et al.  Intervention Strategies for Improving Patient Adherence to Follow-Up in the Era of Mobile Information Technology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2014, PloS one.

[43]  P. Maglio,et al.  Innovation and Big Data in Smart Service Systems , 2016 .

[44]  John Dumay,et al.  Intellectual capital research: a critical examination of the third stage , 2013 .

[45]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Contextualization and value-in-context: How context frames exchange , 2011 .

[46]  L. Edvinsson IC 21: reflections from 21 years of IC practice and theory , 2013 .

[47]  M. Akaka,et al.  Global brand positioning and perceptions , 2010 .

[48]  B. Edvardsson,et al.  Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation: a social construction approach , 2011 .

[49]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  The context of experience , 2015 .

[50]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[51]  Lorna Uden,et al.  Developing Data Analytics to Improve Services in a Mechanical Engineering Company , 2014, KMO.

[52]  Andrea De Mauro,et al.  A formal definition of Big Data based on its essential features , 2016 .

[53]  Sunil Erevelles,et al.  Big Data consumer analytics and the transformation of marketing , 2016 .

[54]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  The service system is the basic abstraction of service science , 2009, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[55]  Robert F. Lusch,et al.  Service Innovation: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective , 2015, MIS Q..

[56]  John Dumay A Critical Reflection on the Future of Intellectual Capital: From Reporting to Disclosure , 2016 .

[57]  Keith W. Glaister,et al.  Value creation from big data: Looking inside the black box , 2018 .

[58]  M. Akaka,et al.  A Service-Ecosystem Perspective on Value Creation: Implications for International Business , 2017 .