Parametric and non-parametric modeling of short-term synaptic plasticity. Part II: Experimental study

This paper presents a synergistic parametric and non-parametric modeling study of short-term plasticity (STP) in the Schaffer collateral to hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neuron (SC) synapse. Parametric models in the form of sets of differential and algebraic equations have been proposed on the basis of the current understanding of biological mechanisms active within the system. Non-parametric Poisson–Volterra models are obtained herein from broadband experimental input–output data. The non-parametric model is shown to provide better prediction of the experimental output than a parametric model with a single set of facilitation/depression (FD) process. The parametric model is then validated in terms of its input–output transformational properties using the non-parametric model since the latter constitutes a canonical and more complete representation of the synaptic nonlinear dynamics. Furthermore, discrepancies between the experimentally-derived non-parametric model and the equivalent non-parametric model of the parametric model suggest the presence of multiple FD processes in the SC synapses. Inclusion of an additional set of FD process in the parametric model makes it replicate better the characteristics of the experimentally-derived non-parametric model. This improved parametric model in turn provides the requisite biological interpretability that the non-parametric model lacks.

[1]  T. Berger,et al.  General methodology for nonlinear modeling of neural systems with Poisson point-process inputs. , 2005, Mathematical biosciences.

[2]  W. Regehr,et al.  Short-term synaptic plasticity. , 2002, Annual review of physiology.

[3]  R Rahamimoff,et al.  A dual effect of calcium ions on neuromuscular facilitation , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  T. Abrams,et al.  Persistent, Exocytosis-Independent Silencing of Release Sites Underlies Homosynaptic Depression at Sensory Synapses inAplysia , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  T. Berger,et al.  Nonlinear systems analysis of the hippocampal perforant path-dentate projection. II. Effects of random impulse train stimulation. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  R. Silver,et al.  Locus of frequency‐dependent depression identified with multiple‐probability fluctuation analysis at rat climbing fibre‐Purkinje cell synapses , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  B. Gustafsson,et al.  Factors explaining heterogeneity in short‐term synaptic dynamics of hippocampal glutamatergic synapses in the neonatal rat , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  S. W. Kuffler,et al.  NATURE OF THE "ENDPLATE POTENTIAL" IN CURARIZED MUSCLE , 1941 .

[9]  George J. Augustine,et al.  Adaptation of Ca2+-Triggered Exocytosis in Presynaptic Terminals , 1996, Neuron.

[10]  W. O. Friesen,et al.  The analysis of nonlinear synaptic transmission , 1977, The Journal of general physiology.

[11]  J. Clements,et al.  Presynaptic and postsynaptic mechanisms underlie paired pulse depression at single GABAergic boutons in rat collicular cultures , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  C. Stevens,et al.  Heterogeneity of Release Probability, Facilitation, and Depletion at Central Synapses , 1997, Neuron.

[13]  V. Marmarelis Identification of nonlinear biological systems using laguerre expansions of kernels , 1993, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Peter W. Gage,et al.  Facilitation of acetylcholine secretion at a mouse neuromuscular junction , 1981, Brain Research.

[15]  G. Westbrook,et al.  The impact of receptor desensitization on fast synaptic transmission , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[16]  Anatol C. Kreitzer,et al.  Interplay between Facilitation, Depression, and Residual Calcium at Three Presynaptic Terminals , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Idan Segev,et al.  Multiple mechanisms govern the dynamics of depression at neocortical synapses of young rats , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  Kahori Yamada,et al.  Benzothiadiazides inhibit rapid glutamate receptor desensitization and enhance glutamatergic synaptic currents , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[19]  K. Magleby,et al.  Augmentation and facilitation of transmitter release. A quantitative description at the frog neuromuscular junction , 1982, The Journal of general physiology.

[20]  I. Módy,et al.  Low extracellular magnesium induces epileptiform activity and spreading depression in rat hippocampal slices. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  L. Trussell,et al.  Glutamate receptor desensitization and its role in synaptic transmission , 1989, Neuron.

[22]  Masanobu Kano,et al.  Presynaptic origin of paired‐pulse depression at climbing fibre‐Purkinje cell synapses in the rat cerebellum , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  Vasilis Z. Marmarelis,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamic Modeling of Physiological Systems: Marmarelis/Nonlinear , 2004 .

[24]  C. Stevens,et al.  Facilitation and depression at single central synapses , 1995, Neuron.

[25]  C. Stevens,et al.  Very short-term plasticity in hippocampal synapses. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  R. Nicoll,et al.  Synaptic Refractory Period Provides a Measure of Probability of Release in the Hippocampus , 1997, Neuron.

[27]  G. Lynch,et al.  Paired‐pulse and frequency facilitation in the CA1 region of the in vitro rat hippocampus , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..

[29]  B. Gustafsson,et al.  Vesicle release probability and pre‐primed pool at glutamatergic synapses in area CA1 of the rat neonatal hippocampus , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  Cornelius Schwarz,et al.  Efficacy and short-term plasticity at GABAergic synapses between Purkinje and cerebellar nuclei neurons. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  P. Jonas,et al.  Efficacy and Stability of Quantal GABA Release at a Hippocampal Interneuron–Principal Neuron Synapse , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  G. Westbrook,et al.  The time course of glutamate in the synaptic cleft. , 1992, Science.

[33]  Vasilis Z. Marmarelis,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamic Modeling of Physiological Systems , 2004 .

[34]  Theodore W. Berger,et al.  A biologically based model of functional properties of the hippocampus , 1994, Neural Networks.

[35]  D. Faber,et al.  Properties and Plasticity of Paired-Pulse Depression at a Central Synapse , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  C. Jahr,et al.  Multivesicular Release at Climbing Fiber-Purkinje Cell Synapses , 2001, Neuron.

[37]  T. Berger,et al.  Nonlinear systems analysis of the hippocampal perforant path-dentate projection. I. Theoretical and interpretational considerations. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  T. Berger,et al.  Nonlinear systems analysis of the hippocampal perforant path-dentate projection. III. Comparison of random train and paired impulse stimulation. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.