Neural correlates of reward-driven attentional capture in visual search

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were used to investigate whether a physically non-salient and task-irrelevant stimulus feature previously associated with reward can capture attention. In the training phase, participants implicitly associated a certain color with reward. In the subsequent test phase, participants searched for a uniquely shaped singleton among non-target shapes, with color completely irrelevant to the current task demand. Response time was delayed on trials wherein the target was simultaneously presented with an associated distracter, compared with trials without one. In ERPs, a lateralized reward-associated distracter elicited an N2pc component when a concurrent target was presented on the vertical meridian. The control experiment discounted the possibility that this N2pc was caused by familiarity of the reward-associated distracter. Presenting both the target and reward-associated distracter on the opposite side elicited N2pc, with the reward-associated distracter-elicited N2pc preceding the target-elicited N2pc, albeit only in trials with slow responses. These results show that the participants shifted their attention to the target only after noticing the task-irrelevant reward-associated distracter in slow trials. Therefore, task-irrelevant reward-driven salience can capture attention. Distracter positivity was observed in fast distracter-present trials presenting both a lateral distracter and a midline target. Thus, the reward-associated distracter should be actively suppressed to efficiently select the task-relevant target. Lastly, the distracter-elicited N2pc was negatively correlated with individual differences in reward drive score. This correlation may provide insight into reward sensitivity problems.

[1]  Masaaki Kawahashi,et al.  Renovation of Journal of Visualization , 2010, J. Vis..

[2]  Agnieszka Wykowska,et al.  On the Temporal Relation of Top–Down and Bottom–Up Mechanisms during Guidance of Attention , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence of the Capture of Visual Attention , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  Steven J Luck,et al.  Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: Electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[5]  H. J. Muller,et al.  Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Reward guides vision when it's your thing: Trait reward-seeking in reward-mediated attentional priming , 2010 .

[7]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  C. Carver,et al.  Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales , 1994 .

[9]  J. Theeuwes Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[10]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Attention selection, distractor suppression and N2pc , 2009, Cortex.

[11]  Li Yan-Zhang,et al.  The Chinese Version of the BIS/BAS Scale:Reliability and Validity , 2008 .

[12]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Involuntary Attentional Capture is Determined by Task Set: Evidence from Event-related Brain Potentials , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  Taomei Guo,et al.  Association with positive outcome induces early effects in event-related brain potentials , 2012, Biological Psychology.

[14]  H. Eysenck A Model for Personality , 1981 .

[15]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Reward Guides Vision when It's Your Thing: Trait Reward-Seeking in Reward-Mediated Visual Priming , 2010, PloS one.

[16]  J. Gray,et al.  A Critique of Eysenck’s Theory of Personality , 1981 .

[17]  E. Wascher,et al.  The influence of extrinsic motivation on competition-based selection , 2011, Behavioural Brain Research.

[18]  Thomas Töllner,et al.  Top-down dimensional weight set determines the capture of visual attention: evidence from the PCN component. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  Jon Driver,et al.  Reward Priority of Visual Target Singletons Modulates Event-Related Potential Signatures of Attentional Selection , 2009, Psychological science.

[20]  Geoffrey F. Woodman,et al.  Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search , 1999, Nature.

[21]  Steven Yantis,et al.  Value-driven attentional and oculomotor capture during goal-directed, unconstrained viewing , 2012, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[22]  M. Eimer The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  Leonardo Chelazzi,et al.  Cooperative and Opposing Effects of Strategic and Involuntary Attention , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Andrew B Leber,et al.  Neural Predictors of Within-Subject Fluctuations in Attentional Control , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Vincent Di Lollo,et al.  Electrophysiological Indices of Target and Distractor Processing in Visual Search , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  Anders Petersen,et al.  Attentional Capture by Salient Distractors during Visual Search Is Determined by Temporal Task Demands , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  S. Luck,et al.  A Common Neural Mechanism for Preventing and Terminating the Allocation of Attention , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Hongbin Zha,et al.  Structure-Sensitive Superpixels via Geodesic Distance , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.

[29]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Reward grabs the eye: Oculomotor capture by rewarding stimuli , 2012, Vision Research.

[30]  Hongbo Yu,et al.  Interaction between value and perceptual salience in value-driven attentional capture. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[31]  K. Berridge,et al.  What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? , 1998, Brain Research Reviews.

[32]  J. Raymond,et al.  Value associations of irrelevant stimuli modify rapid visual orienting , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  S. Mineka,et al.  Fears, phobias, and preparedness: toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. , 2001, Psychological review.

[34]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Attentional capture by irrelevant emotional distractor faces. , 2011, Emotion.

[35]  Patryk A. Laurent,et al.  Value-driven attentional capture , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Reward Changes Salience in Human Vision via the Anterior Cingulate , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  S J Luck,et al.  Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[39]  Stefanie I. Becker,et al.  Irrelevant singletons in pop-out search: attentional capture or filtering costs? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  P. Muris,et al.  Gray's model of personality and addiction. , 2006, Addictive behaviors.