Effect of Genetic Diagnosis on Patients with Previously Undiagnosed Disease

Background Many patients remain without a diagnosis despite extensive medical evaluation. The Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN) was established to apply a multidisciplinary model in the evaluation of the most challenging cases and to identify the biologic characteristics of newly discovered diseases. The UDN, which is funded by the National Institutes of Health, was formed in 2014 as a network of seven clinical sites, two sequencing cores, and a coordinating center. Later, a central biorepository, a metabolomics core, and a model organisms screening center were added. Methods We evaluated patients who were referred to the UDN over a period of 20 months. The patients were required to have an undiagnosed condition despite thorough evaluation by a health care provider. We determined the rate of diagnosis among patients who subsequently had a complete evaluation, and we observed the effect of diagnosis on medical care. Results A total of 1519 patients (53% female) were referred to the UDN, of whom 601 (40%) were accepted for evaluation. Of the accepted patients, 192 (32%) had previously undergone exome sequencing. Symptoms were neurologic in 40% of the applicants, musculoskeletal in 10%, immunologic in 7%, gastrointestinal in 7%, and rheumatologic in 6%. Of the 382 patients who had a complete evaluation, 132 received a diagnosis, yielding a rate of diagnosis of 35%. A total of 15 diagnoses (11%) were made by clinical review alone, and 98 (74%) were made by exome or genome sequencing. Of the diagnoses, 21% led to recommendations regarding changes in therapy, 37% led to changes in diagnostic testing, and 36% led to variant‐specific genetic counseling. We defined 31 new syndromes. Conclusions The UDN established a diagnosis in 132 of the 382 patients who had a complete evaluation, yielding a rate of diagnosis of 35%. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health Common Fund.)

[1]  Michael F. Wangler,et al.  A Recurrent De Novo Variant in NACC1 Causes a Syndrome Characterized by Infantile Epilepsy, Cataracts, and Profound Developmental Delay. , 2017, American journal of human genetics.

[2]  Michael F. Wangler,et al.  A Syndromic Neurodevelopmental Disorder Caused by De Novo Variants in EBF3. , 2017, American journal of human genetics.

[3]  Euan A Ashley,et al.  The Undiagnosed Diseases Network of the National Institutes of Health: A National Extension. , 2015, JAMA.

[4]  Michael F. Wangler,et al.  Clinically severe CACNA1A alleles affect synaptic function and neurodegeneration differentially , 2017, PLoS genetics.

[5]  Rena A. Godfrey,et al.  The National Institutes of Health Undiagnosed Diseases Program: insights into rare diseases , 2011, Genetics in Medicine.

[6]  Magalie S Leduc,et al.  Molecular findings among patients referred for clinical whole-exome sequencing. , 2014, JAMA.

[7]  Masato Kimura,et al.  NCBI’s Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes: dbGaP , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[8]  Clara Gaff,et al.  Diagnostic Impact and Cost-effectiveness of Whole-Exome Sequencing for Ambulant Children With Suspected Monogenic Conditions , 2017, JAMA pediatrics.

[9]  Matthew H. Brush,et al.  Biallelic Mutations in ATP5F1D, which Encodes a Subunit of ATP Synthase, Cause a Metabolic Disorder , 2018, American journal of human genetics.

[10]  E. Ashley,et al.  A New Approach to Rare Diseases of Children: The Undiagnosed Diseases Network. , 2018, The Journal of pediatrics.

[11]  Kelly Schoch,et al.  Clinical application of exome sequencing in undiagnosed genetic conditions , 2012, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[12]  Marcel E Dinger,et al.  Integrating exome sequencing into a diagnostic pathway for epileptic encephalopathy: Evidence of clinical utility and cost effectiveness , 2018, Molecular genetics & genomic medicine.

[13]  I. Holm,et al.  Implementing the Single Institutional Review Board Model: Lessons from the Undiagnosed Diseases Network , 2017, Clinical and translational science.

[14]  Mary Shimoyama,et al.  Successful Application of Whole Genome Sequencing in a Medical Genetics Clinic , 2016, Journal of Pediatric Genetics.

[15]  Orion J. Buske,et al.  The Matchmaker Exchange: A Platform for Rare Disease Gene Discovery , 2015, Human mutation.

[16]  Euan A Ashley,et al.  The Undiagnosed Diseases Network: Accelerating Discovery about Health and Disease. , 2017, American journal of human genetics.

[17]  A. Hoischen,et al.  De Novo Truncating Variants in ASXL2 Are Associated with a Unique and Recognizable Clinical Phenotype. , 2017, American journal of human genetics.

[18]  E. Ashley Towards precision medicine , 2016, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[19]  Michael Brudno,et al.  PhenomeCentral: A Portal for Phenotypic and Genotypic Matchmaking of Patients with Rare Genetic Diseases , 2015, Human mutation.

[20]  J. Rosenfeld,et al.  A recurrent p.Arg92Trp variant in steroidogenic factor-1 (NR5A1) can act as a molecular switch in human sex development , 2016, Human molecular genetics.

[21]  Ricardo Villamarín-Salomón,et al.  ClinVar: public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[22]  Eric Vilain,et al.  Clinical exome sequencing for genetic identification of rare Mendelian disorders. , 2014, JAMA.

[23]  Anna Lehman,et al.  The cost and diagnostic yield of exome sequencing for children with suspected genetic disorders: a benchmarking study , 2018, Genetics in Medicine.

[24]  Michael Brudno,et al.  PhenoTips: Patient Phenotyping Software for Clinical and Research Use , 2013, Human mutation.