Online qualitative nugget classification by using a linear vector quantization neural network for resistance spot welding

Real-time estimation of weld quality from process data is one of the key objectives in current weld control systems for resistance spot-welding processes. This task can be alleviated if the weld controller is equipped with a voltage sensor in the secondary circuit. Replacing the goal of quantifying the weld quality in terms of button size by the more modest objective of indirect estimation of the class of the weld, e.g., satisfactory (acceptable, “normal” button size), unsatisfactory (undersized, “cold” welds), and defects (“expulsion”), further improves the feasibility of the mission of indirect estimation of the weld quality. This paper proposes an algorithmic framework based on a linear vector quantization (LVQ) neural network for estimation of the button size class based on a small number of dynamic resistance patterns for cold, normal, and expulsion welds that are collected during the stabilization process. Nugget quality classification by using an LVQ network was tested on two types of controllers; medium-frequency direct current (MFDC) with constant current controller and alternating current (AC) with constant heat controller. In order to reduce the dimensionality of the input data vector, different sets of features are extracted from the dynamic resistance profile and are compared by using power of the test criteria. The results from all of these investigations are very promising and are reported here in detail.

[1]  Kenneth B. Haefner,et al.  Real Time Adaptive Spot Welding Control , 1991 .

[2]  O. P. Gupta,et al.  An Experimental Study of Resistance Spot Welding in 1 mm Thick Sheet of Low Carbon Steel , 1996 .

[3]  Wei Li ENERGY CONSUMPTION IN AC AND MFDC RESISTANCE SPOT WELDING , 2004 .

[4]  C. M. Shakarji,et al.  Spot Weld Analysis With 2D Ultrasonic Arrays , 2004, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[5]  C. J. Li,et al.  Controlling resistance spot welding using neural network and fuzzy logic , 1998 .

[6]  Carl D. Sorensen,et al.  Measurement of dynamic electrical and mechanical properties of resistance spot welding , 1987 .

[7]  Brian Rooks Advances in resistance welding for body‐in‐white , 2003 .

[8]  Tae-Sung Lee,et al.  A quality assurance technique for resistance spot welding using a neuro-fuzzy algorithm , 2001 .

[9]  Sehun Rhee,et al.  New technology for measuring dynamic resistance and estimating strength in resistance spot welding , 2000 .

[10]  Shinobu Satonaka,et al.  Ultrasonic examination of resistance spot welds in thin sheet steel using a focusing probe , 1989 .

[11]  Hyungsuck Cho,et al.  A Proportional-Integral Controller for Resistance Spot Welding Using Nugget Expansion , 1989 .

[12]  Roman Gr. Maev,et al.  A study on using scanning acoustic microscopy and neural network techniques to evaluate the quality of resistance spot welding , 2003 .

[13]  Janez Diaci,et al.  Expulsion detection system for resistance spot welding based on a neural network , 2004 .

[14]  C.-S. Chien,et al.  Investigation of monitoring systems for resistance spot welding , 2002 .

[15]  David W. Dickinson,et al.  Analysis and development of a real-time control methodology in resistance spot welding , 1991 .

[16]  Wei Li,et al.  ENERGY CONSUMPTION IN AC AND MFDC RESISTANCE SPOT WELDING , 2004 .

[17]  Y J Park,et al.  Quality evaluation by classification of electrode force patterns in the resistance spot welding process using neural networks , 2004 .

[18]  J. D. Brown,et al.  Application of artificial intelligence techniques to resistance spot welding , 1998 .