Comparison of measured and computed radial trajectories of plasma focus devices UMDPF1 and UMDPF0

In published literature, there has been scant data on radial trajectory of the plasma focus and no comparison of computed with measured radial trajectory. This paper provides the first such comparative study. We compute the trajectories of the inward-moving radial shock and magnetic piston of UMDPF1 plasma focus and compare these with measured data taken from a streak photograph. The comparison shows agreement with the measured radial trajectory in terms of average speeds and general shape of trajectory. This paper also presents the measured trajectory of the radially compressing piston in another machine, the UMDPF0 plasma focus, confirming that the computed radial trajectory also shows similar general agreement. Features of divergence between the computed and measured trajectories, towards the end of the radial compression, are discussed. From the measured radial trajectories, an inference is made that the neutron yield mechanism could not be thermonuclear. A second inference is made regarding the speeds of axial post-pinch shocks, which are recently considered as a useful tool for damage testing of fusion-related wall materials.

[1]  C. Tuniz,et al.  Experimental results on the irradiation of nuclear fusion relevant materials at the dense plasma focus ‘Bora’ device , 2015 .

[2]  P. Kubes,et al.  Existence of a return direction for plasma escaping from a pinched column in a plasma focus discharge , 2015 .

[3]  Alejandro Clausse,et al.  Characterization of the axial plasma shock in a table top plasma focus after the pinch and its possible application to testing materials for fusion reactors , 2014 .

[4]  S. Auluck.  Bounds imposed on the sheath velocity of a dense plasma focus by conservation laws and ionization stability condition , 2014, 1408.4887.

[5]  Hossein Jafari,et al.  Simulation of electrical discharge in a 3.6 Joule miniature plasma focus device using SIMULINK , 2014, The European Physical Journal D.

[6]  Sushil Auluck.  Global parameter optimization of a Mather-type plasma focus in the framework of the Gratton–Vargas two-dimensional snowplow model , 2014, 1407.8271.

[7]  Nitturi Naresh Kumar,et al.  Low-Energy Plasma Focus Device as an Electron Beam Source , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[8]  A. Blagoev,et al.  On the current layer in the run-down phase of the plasma focus discharge , 2014 .

[9]  S. Saw,et al.  Properties of Ion Beams Generated by Nitrogen Plasma Focus , 2014 .

[10]  M. Ghoranneviss,et al.  Evolution of the IR-T1 Tokamak Plasma Local and Global Parameters , 2014 .

[11]  J. Ali,et al.  Some Generalised Characteristics of the Electro-dynamics of the Plasma Focus in Its Axial Phase: Illustrated by an Application to Independantly Determine the Drive Current Fraction and the Mass Swept-Up Fraction , 2014 .

[12]  R. Rawat,et al.  Magnetic Reynolds Number and Neon Current Sheet Structure in the Axial Phase of a Plasma Focus , 2013 .

[13]  J. Ali,et al.  Numerical Experiments on Radiative Cooling and Collapse in Plasma Focus Operated in Krypton , 2013 .

[14]  M. Krishnan,et al.  The Dense Plasma Focus: A Versatile Dense Pinch for Diverse Applications , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[15]  A. H. Baijan,et al.  Magnetic Probe Measurements in INTI Plasma Focus to Determine Dependence of Axial Speed with Pressure in Neon , 2012 .

[16]  C. S. Wong,et al.  Deuteron Beam Source Based on Mather Type Plasma Focus , 2012, Journal of Fusion Energy.

[17]  F. Aghamir,et al.  Correlation of current drop, filling gas pressure, and ion beam emission in a low energy Mather-type plasma focus device , 2012 .

[18]  S. Lee,et al.  Characterizing Plasma Focus Devices—Role of the Static Inductance—Instability Phase Fitted by Anomalous Resistances , 2011 .

[19]  S. P. Moo,et al.  Numerical experiments on plasma focus neutron yield versus pressure compared with laboratory experiments , 2009 .

[20]  R. Rawat,et al.  Optimizing UNU/ICTP PFF Plasma Focus for Neon Soft X-ray Operation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[21]  S. Lee.  Current and neutron scaling for megajoule plasma focus machines , 2008 .

[22]  C. S. Wong,et al.  Ion Beam Measurements of a Dense Plasma Focus Device Using CR 39 Nuclear Track Detectors , 2008 .

[23]  S. Saw,et al.  Pinch current limitation effect in plasma focus , 2008 .

[24]  T. L. Tan,et al.  An improved radiative plasma focus model calibrated for neon-filled NX2 using a tapered anode , 2007 .

[25]  S. Mohanty,et al.  Compression and neutron and ion beams emission mechanisms within a plasma focus device , 2006 .

[26]  H. Yousefi,et al.  Simulation of high-energy particle production through sausage and kink instabilities in pinched plasma discharges , 2006 .

[27]  C. S. Wong,et al.  Observation of Two Phases of Neutron Emission in a Low Energy Plasma Focus , 2005 .

[28]  S. Khorram,et al.  Adaptation of Sing Lee's model to the Filippov type plasma focus geometry , 2005 .

[29]  S. Al‐Hawat.  Axial velocity measurement of current sheath in a plasma focus device using a magnetic probe , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[30]  H. Chuaqui,et al.  Experimental investigations of hotspots in a low energy plasma focus operating in hydrogen-argon mixtures , 1998 .

[31]  A. Serban,et al.  Dimensions and lifetime of the plasma focus pinch , 1996 .

[32]  K. H. Kwek,et al.  Nonperturbing plasma-focus measurements in the run-down phase , 1989 .

[33]  Suryadi,et al.  A simple facility for the teaching of plasma dynamics and plasma nuclear fusion , 1988 .

[34]  D. Potter.  The formation of high-density z-pinches , 1978 .

[35]  J. Shearer.  Contraction of Z pinches actuated by radiation losses , 1976 .

[36]  D. Potter.  NUMERICAL STUDIES OF THE PLASMA FOCUS. , 1971 .

[37]  J. Mather.  Investigation of the High‐Energy Acceleration Mode in the Coaxial Gun , 1964 .