The inner workings of phase change memory: Lessons from prototype PCM devices

We describe observations into the inner workings of phase change memory devices, obtained by fabrication, electrical characterization, failure analysis, and modeling of prototype phase change memory devices over the past few years. Experiments involving the RESET and SET operations, the speed of SET operations, the impact of voltage polarity, and the drift of RESET resistances after programming have been performed. Our prototype devices include PCM “pore” devices down to 20nm in actual diameter, PCM “bridge” devices down to 20nm in width, and novel “parallel cell” devices designed to trade off resistance contrast for lower resistance drift. Simple resistors integrated in series with these devices allow programming with pulses down to <10ns pulse-widths. Highly accurate current measurements can be triggered as soon as 1 millisecond after programming, so that even five-minute-long measurements can capture drift over five orders of magnitude in time. A customized finite-difference PCM simulator is capable of handling large and arbitrary 3-D structures, and can be matched against fast electrical SET and RESET experiments, slow thin-film crystallization experiments, or optical pulse experiments. Our results suggest that many of the idiosyncrasies of real PCM devices — “telegraph”-like noise, the dependence of SET resistance on pulse duration, and the variability of both repeated programming events and drift measurements even on the same device — can be traced to the important yet under-appreciated role of poly-crystalline grains and grain boundaries within the PCM device.

[1]  M. Wuttig,et al.  Atomic force microscopy measurements of crystal nucleation and growth rates in thin films of amorphous Te alloys , 2004 .

[2]  A. Pirovano,et al.  Low-field amorphous state resistance and threshold voltage drift in chalcogenide materials , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[3]  M. Breitwisch,et al.  Novel One-Mask Self-Heating Pillar Phase Change Memory , 2006, 2006 Symposium on VLSI Technology, 2006. Digest of Technical Papers..

[4]  M. Breitwisch,et al.  Ultra-Thin Phase-Change Bridge Memory Device Using GeSb , 2006, 2006 International Electron Devices Meeting.

[5]  Y.C. Chen,et al.  Write Strategies for 2 and 4-bit Multi-Level Phase-Change Memory , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting.

[6]  Winfried W. Wilcke,et al.  Storage-class memory: The next storage system technology , 2008, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[7]  Stefan K. Lai,et al.  Flash memories: Successes and challenges , 2008, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[8]  Kailash Gopalakrishnan,et al.  Overview of candidate device technologies for storage-class memory , 2008, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[9]  K. Goodson,et al.  The Impact of Thermal Boundary Resistance in Phase-Change Memory Devices , 2008, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[10]  Shih-Hung Chen,et al.  Phase-change random access memory: A scalable technology , 2008, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[11]  S. G. Bishop,et al.  Glassy Solid Observation of the Role of Subcritical Nuclei in Crystallization of a , 2012 .

[12]  A. Pirovano,et al.  Statistical and scaling behavior of structural relaxation effects in phase-change memory (PCM) devices , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium.

[13]  G. Burr,et al.  Voltage polarity effects in GST-based phase change memory: Physical origins and implications , 2010, 2010 International Electron Devices Meeting.

[14]  K. Gopalakrishnan,et al.  Phase change memory technology , 2010, 1001.1164.

[15]  Yeonwoong Jung,et al.  Extremely low drift of resistance and threshold voltage in amorphous phase change nanowire devices , 2010 .

[16]  G. Burr,et al.  Highly-scalable novel access device based on Mixed Ionic Electronic conduction (MIEC) materials for high density phase change memory (PCM) arrays , 2010, 2010 Symposium on VLSI Technology.