The Mozart effect in biofeedback visual rehabilitation: a case report

Purpose To evaluate the usefulness of acoustic biofeedback by means of Mozart’s Sonata for Two Pianos in D Major K. 448 to maintain and/or restore visual performance in a patient with macular pucker and glaucoma. Methods A 74-year-old patient with open angle glaucoma in both eyes and macular pucker in the right eye (RE) underwent visual rehabilitation with acoustic biofeedback by means of the MAIA™ Vision Training Module (Centervue, Padova, Italy) 10 minutes each eye once a week for 5 weeks. The patient was asked to move his eyes according to a sound which changed into Mozart’s Sonata for Two Pianos when the patient locked the fixation target. Results Best-corrected visual acuity improved in his right eye (RE) and was stable in the left eye (LE). Fixation stability improved in both eyes, and retinal sensitivity decreased in the RE and improved in the LE. The characteristic of the macular pucker did not change during the training as demonstrated with optical coherence tomography. The patient was very satisfied with the training, as demonstrated by a 25-item questionnaire (National Eye Institute – Visual Functioning Questionnaire, NEI-VFQ-25). The patient’s reading speed and the character size which he was able to read improved in his RE. Conclusion Music could enhance synaptic plasticity and affect neural learning and fixation training by means of MAIA vision training. Therefore it can improve visual performance in patients with macular pucker, postpone the surgical time, and assure a better quality of life for the patient.

[1]  K. Ukai,et al.  Changes in waveform of congenital nystagmus associated with biofeedback treatment. , 1990, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Music, the food of neuroscience? , 2005, Nature.

[3]  C. Gabrieli,et al.  A new method of biofeedback in the management of low vision , 2002, Eye.

[4]  R Näsänen,et al.  Training-induced cortical representation of a hemianopic hemifield , 2006, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[5]  D. Domanico,et al.  Microperimetric Biofeedback in AMD Patients , 2007, Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback.

[6]  Norman M Weinberger Music and the brain. , 2004, Scientific American.

[7]  M Mackeben,et al.  The importance of sustained attention for patients with maculopathies , 2000, Vision Research.

[8]  Ronald A Schuchard,et al.  Preferred retinal loci and macular scotoma characteristics in patients with age-related macular degeneration. , 2005, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[9]  M. McMahon,et al.  Music maestro please , 1997 .

[10]  Paul H. E. Tiesinga,et al.  Attentional modulation of firing rate and synchrony in a model cortical network , 2005, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[11]  R. Näsänen,et al.  Temporal sensitivity in a hemianopic visual field can be improved by long-term training using flicker stimulation , 2006, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[12]  Alison Abbott,et al.  Neurobiology: Music, maestro, please! , 2002, Nature.

[13]  F. Rauscher,et al.  Music and spatial task performance , 1993, Nature.

[14]  E. Vingolo,et al.  Low-Vision Rehabilitation by Means of MP-1 Biofeedback Examination in Patients with Different Macular Diseases: A Pilot Study , 2009, Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback.