Response-rate invariance in concurrent schedules: effects of different changeover contingencies.

In a two-key chamber, one key (the food key) was either red or green with different variable-interval schedules operating concurrently in each color and a second key (the changeover key) served to change the food-key color. Three pigeons were trained with either a 2-sec changeover delay or a 0-sec changeover delay and three birds with a fixed-ratio 2 on the changeover key instead of a changeover delay. The proportion of time spent in red approximated the proportion of reinforcers delivered in red for all birds. When the procedure was changed so that reinforcers were signalled in the green schedule, rates of reinforcement were unaltered, but the pigeons spent virtually the whole session in red. Changeovers to green were allowed only when a reinforcer was assigned by the schedule associated with green. For all pigeons with the fixed-ratio requirement on the changeover key or with a 0-sec changeover delay, the overall rate of red-key responses was higher during the signalling condition than during unsignalled, or baseline, condition. The present data question the generality of previous reports that the rate of one response is independent of the amount of time allocated to the alternative response.

[1]  J D Findley,et al.  Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling. , 1958, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  H. Rachlin,et al.  Effects of alternative reinforcement: does the source matter? , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  H. Rachlin,et al.  Response rate as a function of amount of reinforcement for a signalled concurrent response. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  G. S. Reynolds,et al.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  J. Todorov Concurrent performances: effect of punishment contingent on the switching response. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  D. Stubbs,et al.  Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  R. Shull,et al.  Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  A. Brownstein,et al.  Some effects of relative reinforcement rate and changeover delay in response-independent concurrent schedules of reinforcement. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  A. Catania,et al.  Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence. , 1963, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  R. J. Irwin,et al.  Multiple schedules: effects of the distribution of reinforcements between component on the distribution of responses between conponents. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  E. Fantino,et al.  Choice, rate of reinforcement, and the changeover delay. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  W M Baum,et al.  Choice as time allocation. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  Charles P. Shimp,et al.  TIME‐ALLOCATION, MATCHING, AND CONTRAST1 , 1974 .

[14]  A. Catania,et al.  Self-inhibiting effects of reinforcement. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[15]  W M Baum,et al.  The correlation-based law of effect. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[16]  H. Rachlin Contrast and Matching. , 1973 .

[17]  S S Pliskoff Effects of symmetrical and asymmetrical changeover delays on concurrent performances. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[18]  S S Pliskoff,et al.  Effects on concurrent performances of a stimulus correlated with reinforcer availability. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[19]  R. Herrnstein On the law of effect. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[20]  A C Catania,et al.  Concurrent performances: synthesizing rate constancies by manipulating contingencies for a single response. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.