Hox group 3 paralogous genes act synergistically in the formation of somitic and neural crest-derived structures.

Hox genes encode transcription factors that are used to regionalize the mammalian embryo. Analysis of mice carrying targeted mutations in individual and multiple Hox genes is beginning to reveal a complex network of interactions among these closely related genes which is responsible for directing the formation of spatially restricted tissues and structures. In this report we present an analysis of the genetic interactions between all members of the third paralogous group, Hoxa3, Hoxb3, and Hoxd3. Previous analysis has shown that although mice homozygous for loss-of-function mutations in either Hoxa3 or Hoxd3 have no defects in common, mice mutant for both genes demonstrate that these two genes strongly interact in a dosage-dependent manner. To complete the analysis of this paralogous gene family, mice with a targeted disruption of the Hoxb3 gene were generated. Homozygous mutants have minor defects at low penetrance in the formation of both the cervical vertebrae and the IXth cranial nerve. Analysis and comparison of all double-mutant combinations demonstrate that all three members of this paralogous group interact synergistically to affect the development of both neuronal and mesenchymal neural crest-derived structures, as well as somitic mesoderm-derived structures. Surprisingly, with respect to the formation of the cervical vertebrae, mice doubly mutant for Hoxa3 and Hoxd3 or Hoxb3 and Hoxd3 show an indistinguishable defect, loss of the entire atlas. This suggests that the identity of the specific Hox genes that are functional in a given region may not be as critical as the total number of Hox genes operating in that region.

[1]  M. Capecchi,et al.  Targeted mutations in hoxa-9 and hoxb-9 reveal synergistic interactions. , 1997, Developmental biology.

[2]  R. Krumlauf,et al.  Altered segmental identity and abnormal migration of motor neurons in mice lacking Hoxb-1 , 1996, Nature.

[3]  M. Capecchi,et al.  Targeted disruption of the Hoxb-2 locus in mice interferes with expression of Hoxb-1 and Hoxb-4. , 1996, Development.

[4]  Y. Hérault,et al.  Function of the Evx‐2 gene in the morphogenesis of vertebrate limbs. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[5]  D. Duboule,et al.  Synpolydactyly in mice with a targeted deficiency in the HoxD complex , 1996, Nature.

[6]  J. M. Goddard,et al.  Mice with targeted disruption of Hoxb-1 fail to form the motor nucleus of the VIIth nerve. , 1996, Development.

[7]  M. Capecchi,et al.  Targeted disruption of hoxc-4 causes esophageal defects and vertebral transformations. , 1996, Developmental biology.

[8]  M. Capecchi,et al.  A mutational analysis of the 5' HoxD genes: dissection of genetic interactions during limb development in the mouse. , 1996, Development.

[9]  P. Holland,et al.  Hox genes and chordate evolution. , 1996, Developmental biology.

[10]  P. Chambon,et al.  Functional cooperation between the non-paralogous genes Hoxa-10 and Hoxd-11 in the developing forelimb and axial skeleton. , 1996, Development.

[11]  P. Chambon,et al.  Specific and redundant functions of the paralogous Hoxa-9 and Hoxd-9 genes in forelimb and axial skeleton patterning. , 1996, Development.

[12]  R. Behringer,et al.  Compound mutants for the paralogous hoxa-4, hoxb-4, and hoxd-4 genes show more complete homeotic transformations and a dose-dependent increase in the number of vertebrae transformed. , 1995, Genes & development.

[13]  M. Capecchi,et al.  The role of Hoxa-3 in mouse thymus and thyroid development. , 1995, Development.

[14]  M. Capecchi,et al.  Absence of radius and ulna in mice lacking hoxa-11 andhoxd-11 , 1995, Nature.

[15]  H. Suemori,et al.  Hoxc-9 mutant mice show anterior transformation of the vertebrae and malformation of the sternum and ribs , 1995, Mechanisms of Development.

[16]  R. Behringer,et al.  Mutations in paralogous Hox genes result in overlapping homeotic transformations of the axial skeleton: evidence for unique and redundant function. , 1995, Developmental biology.

[17]  R. Maas,et al.  Sexually dimorphic sterility phenotypes in HoxalO-deficient mice , 1995, Nature.

[18]  M. Capecchi,et al.  Axial homeosis and appendicular skeleton defects in mice with a targeted disruption of hoxd-11. , 1994, Development.

[19]  M. Capecchi,et al.  Mice with targeted disruptions in the paralogous genes hoxa-3 and hoxd-3 reveal synergistic interactions , 1994, Nature.

[20]  M. Capecchi,et al.  Targeted disruptions of the murine Hoxa-4 and Hoxa-6 genes result in homeotic transformations of components of the vertebral column , 1994, Mechanisms of Development.

[21]  Pierre Chambon,et al.  A homeotic transformation is generated in the rostral branchial region of the head by disruption of Hoxa-2, which acts as a selector gene , 1993, Cell.

[22]  Moisés Mallo,et al.  Hoxa-2 mutant mice exhibit homeotic transformation of skeletal elements derived from cranial neural crest , 1993, Cell.

[23]  S. Potter,et al.  Homeotic transformations and limb defects in Hox A11 mutant mice. , 1993, Genes & development.

[24]  Denis Duboule,et al.  Disruption of the Hoxd-13 gene induces localized heterochrony leading to mice with neotenic limbs , 1993, Cell.

[25]  M. Capecchi,et al.  Mice homozygous for a targeted disruption of Hoxd-3 (Hox-4.1) exhibit anterior transformations of the first and second cervical vertebrae, the atlas and the axis. , 1993, Development.

[26]  J. Charron,et al.  Specification of axial identity in the mouse: role of the Hoxa-5 (Hox1.3) gene. , 1993, Genes & development.

[27]  R. Krumlauf,et al.  Hoxb-4 (Hox-2.6) mutant mice show homeotic transformation of a cervical vertebra and defects in the closure of the sternal rudiments , 1993, Cell.

[28]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  Targeted mutation of the gene encoding the low affinity NGF receptor p75 leads to deficits in the peripheral sensory nervous system , 1992, Cell.

[29]  R. Krumlauf,et al.  Analysis of the murine Hox‐2.7 gene: conserved alternative transcripts with differential distributions in the nervous system and the potential for shared regulatory regions. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[30]  P. Brûlet,et al.  Homeosis in the mouse induced by a null mutation in the Hox-3.1 gene , 1992, Cell.

[31]  M. Capecchi,et al.  Developmental defects of the ear, cranial nerves and hindbrain resulting from targeted disruption of the mouse homeobox geneHox-#150;1.6 , 1992, Nature.

[32]  P. Chambon,et al.  Disruption of the Hox-1.6 homeobox gene results in defects in a region corresponding to its rostral domain of expression , 1991, Cell.

[33]  M. Capecchi,et al.  Regionally restricted developmental defects resulting from targeted disruption of the mouse homeobox gene hox-1.5 , 1991, Nature.

[34]  A. Joyner,et al.  Examining pattern formation in mouse, chicken and frog embryos with an En-specific antiserum. , 1991, Development.

[35]  R. Krumlauf,et al.  The murine and Drosophila homeobox gene complexes have common features of organization and expression , 1989, Cell.

[36]  D. Duboule,et al.  The structural and functional organization of the murine HOX gene family resembles that of Drosophila homeotic genes. , 1989, The EMBO journal.

[37]  Mario R. Capecchi,et al.  Disruption of the proto-oncogene int-2 in mouse embryo-derived stem cells: a general strategy for targeting mutations to non-selectable genes , 1988, Nature.

[38]  R. Krumlauf,et al.  Characterization of a murine homeo box gene, Hox-2.6, related to the Drosophila Deformed gene. , 1988, Genes & development.

[39]  T. Jessell,et al.  Spatial regulation of axonal glycoprotein expression on subsets of embryonic spinal neurons , 1988, Neuron.

[40]  M. Capecchi,et al.  Site-directed mutagenesis by gene targeting in mouse embryo-derived stem cells , 1987, Cell.

[41]  M. Capecchi,et al.  Genetic interaction between hoxb-5 and hoxb-6 is revealed by nonallelic noncomplementation. , 1995, Genes & development.

[42]  D. Duboule Temporal colinearity and the phylotypic progression: a basis for the stability of a vertebrate Bauplan and the evolution of morphologies through heterochrony. , 1994, Development (Cambridge, England). Supplement.

[43]  D. Duboule,et al.  The organization of the murine HOX gene family resembles that of drosophila homeotic genes , 1989 .